Islam's Law of Apostasy in Our Globalized World
Submitted by Jacob Thomas on Sun, 06/07/2009 - 06:32
Printer-friendly version
Send to friend
PDF version
By Jacob Thomas
A new world order emerged soon after the end of World War II. One of the new ingredients in that new world order was the ending of the era of European colonization, particularly in Africa and Asia. Many of those people who had lived under colonization began migrating in the millions from their homelands to Europe and the Americas. Large numbers of Muslims began to settle in the United Kingdom, France, Germany, Holland, Belgium, Italy, and Spain, which were more than willing to receive them. The United States also began to open its doors to more Muslim immigration. The new immigrants did not always readily assimilate to their new adopted countries. Over the ensuing years complaints and grievances began to manifest themselves in their closely knit communities. They became more disparaging of many aspects of Western culture and even though they enjoyed the benefits of more freedoms and opportunities than their former homelands had offered them, they were unsatisfied with their lot. For many, a stricter adherence to their Islamic faith came to be the norm. And growing intolerance to all other faiths became more and more the prevailing attitude. Even as these new immigrants to the West were able to practice their religious and political beliefs in complete freedom, another completely opposite phenomenon was occurring in the lands of their birth. The leaders in many of those newly de-colonized countries were drafting policies that did not allow for tolerance and freedom of expression for any religion but Islam. Many guest workers from Asia and Africa went to live and work in the oil-rich countries of the Middle East. But they had a rude awakening when they attempted to practice Christianity. Saudi Arabia in particular has been very hostile to religious freedom of its guest workers. They are absolutely forbidden to engage in any worship activity. It is obvious to all who follow world events that conditions for natives in many African countries in particular are even worse. Many who hold to a faith other than Islam are mercilessly sought out, harassed and murdered. While non-Muslims are free to convert to Islam, Muslims who convert to other faiths have to contend with the age-long Law of Apostasy, or "Radda," as it is known in Arabic. There is a long history behind this Islamic tradition. Soon after the death of Muhammad in June, 632 A.D., several Arab tribes defected from Islam, and reverted to their old ways of life. Abu Bakr, the first caliph, mounted military campaigns against the rebels and forced them back into the fold of Islam. Abu Bakr's campaigns are known as Huroob al-Radda, i.e. the wars against apostasy. Eventually, the four Sunni Schools for the interpretation of the Shari'a codified the rules regarding the sin of apostasy (radda) and declared that, unless an apostate repented, he or she is to be punished with death. This harsh attitude towards Muslims who convert to other religions is based on the belief that Muhammad was Allah's last messenger to mankind. Several Qur'anic verses can be adduced as a basis for this harsh treatment of the apostates, such as Surat Aal 'Imran, a Medinan Chapter 3:85, which states: "And whoever seeks a religion other than Islam, it shall not be accepted from him, and in the life to come he shall be among the losers." The subject of Apostasy is currently receiving a good deal of attention in the Arab world. On, 8 May, 2009, an article appeared in the online daily, Al-Awan, entitled "The Proceedings of the Final Meeting of the Islamic Fiqh (Jurisprudence) Assembly." A subtitle carried these shocking Arabic words: " من بدّل دينه فاقتلوه ! " "He who changes his religion must be killed." Following are excerpts from this article, followed by my analysis and comments. "The Islamic "Ulema" (Religious Authorities) who met at the 19th Session of the Islamic Fiqh Assembly in al-Shariqah (UAE) from 26-30 April, 2009, did not distance themselves from the historical tradition regarding apostates and followers of non-Islamic faiths. The documents they produced at the end of their meetings reiterated the classical dictum: 'He who changes his religion must be killed, Man Baddala Deenahu Faqtuloohu.' Likewise, no changes were made in the 7th century edict [issued during the era of the First Caliphate in Medina, 632-661) that proclaimed: 'Eject Jews and Christians from Arabia!' These documents are posted on the website of The Islamic Fiqh Assembly, a branch of the OIC (Organization of the Islamic Conference.) "According to the Assembly, religious freedom is guaranteed in Islam. However, it comes with the following conditions: 'This freedom must be protected from any religious and ideological attempts to subvert the Islamic identity of the Umma.' In other words, this "protected" freedom should make no room for any divergence from fundamental Islamic beliefs. No attempts to spread doubts about Islam are to be allowed. Religious security must be maintained as part and parcel of national security. "Now, as the above conditions are placed on religions freedom, the very idea of "freedom" becomes meaningless. Any departure from the accepted and prevailing Islamic tradition would be regarded as Radda (Apostasy) and Kufr (Unbelief). And to commit the sin of Radda is to court the traditional death sentence unless repentance takes place! "Furthermore, 'Freedom of Speech and Expression' is a guaranteed right according to the documents released by the Assembly. But there is a proviso. The freedom of speech can only be exercised 'within the context of the Sharia.' This, being interpreted in true Islamic fashion, implies that 'the purpose of freedom of expression is to win the favor of Allah and to serve the interests of Muslims.' Therefore, no criticism should be leveled at the laws, ceremonies, and fundamentals of Islam, under the guise of the exercise of the freedom of speech. "The recommendations issued by the Assembly to the members of the OIC states, asked them to coordinate their efforts 'for the protection of the non-negotiable elements of the Islamic heritage in light of the many alien forces that threaten family life.' Also, the member states were requested to re-study the International Agreements and Conventions they had signed with respect to women, in order to reject all those sections that contradict the specificity of Islamic culture and Sharia. "It is unfortunate that the documents produced by the Islamic Fiqh Assembly indicate that the delegates of the member states of the OIC did not take one step in the direction of rescuing the Islamic institutions from fanaticism. The legacy of discrimination against non-Muslims that has accumulated across the centuries has not changed at all. "The conditions for a Dialogue between Religions that have been proposed by the Islamic states require a critical re-evaluation. Muslim delegates who take part in such encounters should be willing to learn from similar dialogues that have taken place, for example, in the Catholic Church, where previously-held strict positions, were abandoned. A new spirit was manifested at The Second Vatican Council with the issuing of two famous declarations about religious freedom: 'Dignitatis Humanae,' and the relation of the church with non-Christian religions, 'Nostra Estate.' "At this juncture in world history there is no escaping the reality of calls for religious tolerance. Acceptance of the International Declaration of Human Rights and the respect of the basic freedoms, including freedom of belief, and of changing one's belief should be upheld by all nation states. True freedom does not exist apart from accepting inherent differences in thought and practice of all belief systems. Muslims need to reject the classification of the world into two realms: the one inhabited by 'people of the Truth' [i.e. Islam] and the other by 'people of the Falsehood' [i.e. all 'Others']. The toleration of all religious doctrines and political ideologies and the espousal of them should be truly free for all people. No one should be excluded from religious, social and political life for harboring opinions contrary to the status quo, and no one should be threatened with physical abuse or incarceration for such beliefs, whatever they are. "Would the Islamic Fiqh Assembly ever manifest the courage of the Second Vatican Council?" Analysis The article of the reformist Arab intellectual deplored the unbending attitude manifested in the proceedings of the April 2009, meeting of "The Islamic Fiqh Assembly." Any hope for a new spirit of tolerance regarding conversion was dashed, and the old tradition as summarized in a dictum attributed to Muhammad remained in place! "He who changes his religion must be killed" Comments We should all be grateful that brave Arab intellectuals are raising delicate subjects such as the conversion of Muslims to other faiths. The al-Awan website is comprised of individuals who are engaged in this noble effort. Its motto calls for "the rise of a rational and secular, i.e. non-religious culture." It is to be hoped that their number will continue to increase. I wrote an article for FFI on 18 May, 2007 entitled "A New Minority in North Africa,"* which dealt with the mortal dangers that would be faced by Muslims who had embraced the Christian faith, should North African states fall under the rule of the Islamists. It speaks to the very situation the al-Awan intellectual warned about, as the following quotes make clear: "The deep reason for forbidding radda is to maintain the very raison d'etre of Islam. Muhammad declared himself to be the last prophet of Allah. Therefore, there could be no new prophet to supersede him; nor could the previous revelations given to the prophets that preceded him, be considered as authentic; since as Muslims contend, they have all been corrupted. Islam remains the only true religion, and Muslims must never consider leaving their faith, for the sin of apostasy is just as serious as the sin of shirk (belief in many gods.) "However strict the laws of apostasy may be, the fact is that some Muslims are converting to Christianity. This is not propaganda emanating from the Christian side. [There are] anecdotal accounts about the reality of these conversions, based on Arab and non-Christian sources. "Most of the testimonies of the converts pointed to the fact that what attracted them to the Christian faith was something that was totally lacking in their own tradition. Allah seemed to be unconcerned about his creatures; all he demanded was blind obedience. They craved for love, and they discovered that message in the Christian faith. That's the summary reason for their conversion. "The relation between Islam and the rest of the world is marked by asymmetry. Muslims may and do enjoy all kinds of freedoms and privileges in the lands of the Kuffar; however non-Muslims are not granted the same rights and privileges when they live in Daru'l Islam. Western politicians don't seem to notice this anomaly; while most Western academicians don't appear concerned about this lack of quid pro quo in the Islamic world. In our globalized world, this state of affairs should not continue. The existence of these New Christians of North Africa must be acknowledged; they need our love and our concern. We should not allow them to be eliminated, if the Islamists succeed in taking over the governments in Tunisia, Algeria, and Morocco." The Law of Apostasy in Islam cannot go on unchallenged in our globalized world. It is high time for Muslim religious leaders to rethink this age-long and inhuman law. The very fact that an Arab intellectual brought to light a shocking reaffirmation of the law against Irtidad, points to the urgency of dealing with this intolerable rule. * http://www.news.faithfreedom.org/index.php?name=News&file=article&sid=1289
Great article! I loved the
Great article! I loved the words "asymmetry", "Lack of quid pro quo."
This asymmetry alone should be a wake-up-call. I am just wishful thinking here, but let us look global and demand reciprocity, symmetry, quid pro quo worldwide. Let us for now accept the Islamic division of the World, but with the difference that "the people of the Falsehood", us, approach "the people of the Truth", them, with this message. Firstly in the countries where they use anti-apostasy-laws and -customs. Secondly let us speak earnestly with the Muslims in Western societies, urging them to protest these anti-apostasy-laws and customs with us.
Of course, they won't do this, but then we could have a good cause for more unity among the followers of all the other faiths, we could found some sort of Inter-Faith-Organisation, rooted in Democratic rules, maybe IFOD of DIFO. Muslims can join too. It would aim at equal rights-opportunities, so also for proselytising, for all faiths, everywhere in the world. For convenience-sake we can call Atheist-Agnosts-Freethinkers also a "faith". We can ask the "Muslim World" everywhere if it is equality or domination they seek.
And to the Political Correct People we now can repeat ad nauseam that Muslims in a global view are NOT ALL so innocent and well-intentioned as they say, pointing to this blatant asymmetry, lack of quid pro quo. This alone should trump all possible arguments they can have.
Hi JAH; Unlike your Qu'rand
Hi JAH;
Unlike your Qu'rand ( the vile book of prostitution ) Christians as well as the non-Christians have access to Bible ( with both old and new testicles).Only the degenerate, illiterate Muslim pigs have no access to Qu'rand. Naive brain dead gullible Muslim mass depend on the Mullahs like Jerk off Zakir Naik to learn about Qu'rand and it's contains. ( all the Fatwas are for that purpose only) Ha ha Ha
You don't have to copy/paste any thing from Bible. You should talk about your vile book Qu'rand only. After all-- you, just like your mentor jerk off Zakir Naik are Qu'rand only Muslim pigs I suppose??
jah you started sound like
jah you started sound like small dog barking with annoying sound, why dont you answer below question, why is your allah sound like PIMP, by giving mohamed a lot of whore, its in quran.
I wanted to follow the Quran and limit the number of my wives to four, but Allah told me I can marry any number of women and whomever I like “so there should be no difficulty for me.” As you know “Allah is oft-forgiving and merciful.” But of course, he told me, ”this is only for you [Oh Muhammad] and not for the believers at large.” (33:49-50)
is your allah pimp?, why your allah giving this revelation, is your allah having sex as well using mohamed body?
It would be a great idea to
It would be a great idea to have all religious leaders to declare this simple statement" All religions lead to god and people oif all religions will go to heaven irrespective of the religion they follow" Shall we start with pope to make this simple statement?
Moslems are sub humans and I do not expect any thing like that from them. At least pope and who so ever is the christian authority should make it clear that I not belonging to the cult of dead jew on a stick will not go to hell, just because i have no faith in a corpse on a stick.
That i call as leading from the front or walk the talk.
Why the muslims need law to
Why the muslims need law to protect there religion? Only in Muslim countries people are punished by law from leaving Islam.
Infact millions want to leave Islam, but with just like earlier days sword, now its law and legislation. All muslim countries dont allow this basic liberty to others. No country has law which punishes people for leaving non-Islam religion to Islam.
In malaysia they introduced "bhumiputra" laws which unfavourably favour muslims. There also people want to leave this barbaric Islam but the law is not helpful.
In Afghanistan "Abdul Rahman" was provided death sentence because he just converted to Christianity.
Muslims are really hypocrats.
JAH, Instead of barking like
JAH,
Instead of barking like a dog, can you give an example of one christian country where apostasy from christianity to any other is punishable.
You cant?
If you have any problem to convert to any religion, at least you can become an athiest like Taslima, Ayan Hirsi Ali etc.
Stop the Islam virus from your end. Islam is darkness, thats why persons who love humanity wants its end.
#7. JAH None of your
#7. JAH
None of your arguments clearly establish that Jesus or any of the Biblical prophets are Muslims. If I use your argument, the word ‘Muslim’ doesn’t even exist in Bible!
The immoral person called Mohammed with the help of his master, the Devil, twisted Biblical stories and invented stories such as Jesus and other Biblical prophets were Muslims.
ibnsahr wrote: jah you
ibnsahr wrote:
jah you started sound like small dog barking with annoying sound, why dont you answer below question, why is your allah sound like PIMP, by giving mohamed a lot of whore, its in quran.
I wanted to follow the Quran and limit the number of my wives to four, but Allah told me I can marry any number of women and whomever I like “so there should be no difficulty for me.” As you know “Allah is oft-forgiving and merciful.” But of course, he told me, ”this is only for you [Oh Muhammad] and not for the believers at large.” (33:49-50)
is your allah pimp?, why your allah giving this revelation, is your allah having sex as well using mohamed body?
What do you think the 72 whoris in heaven are for? Where do you think they are located in heaven? Where do you think the jihadists go after they are admitted into heaven? I'll give you a hint: It's two words combined the initials for these two words are w and h.
"Allah seemed to be
"Allah seemed to be unconcerned about his creatures; all he demanded was blind obedience."
If Allah truly cared for his people then the Muslim world not be suffering in poverty and illiteracy. If Allah truly cared about his people he would have given them the knowledge to improve their health and living standards instead of depending on kafirs to give them foreign aid and medicine. If Allah truly cared about his people he would meet their spiritual needs, give them love, and not allowed blind obedience, but let his people question him.
#7. JAH JAH said:"Jesus
#7. JAH
JAH said:"Jesus believed in one God (Mark 12:29), Muslims do the same. "
The Quran is wrong when it implies that Christians believe in 3 Gods. No Christian believe in 3 Gods.
JAH said:" Jesus never preached the doctrine of Trinity, Muslims do not believe in Trinity either.
- Jesus never preached any doctrine like ‘original sin’, Muslims do not believe in ‘original sin’ either.
Jesus said he was God as below:
”. “You believe, don't you, that I am in the Father and the Father is in me? The words that I say to you I do not speak on my own. It is the Father who dwells in me and who carries out his work.” (John 10:14). Also, “"I and the Father are one." ( John 10:30)
Also Jesus said the Holy Sprit will disclose many things that Jesus did not say. One of those things is the Original Sin.The Holy Sprit spoke through Apostle Paul and others. Though Muslims mistake Jesus words are about Mohammed, they are about the Holy Sprit. Here are those words:
“I have many more things to say to you, but you cannot bear them now. “But when He, the Spirit of truth, comes, He will guide you into all the truth; for He will not speak on His own initiative, but whatever He hears, He will speak; and He will disclose to you what is to come. “He will glorify Me, for He will take of Mine and will disclose it to you “All things that the Father has are Mine; therefore I said that He takes of Mine and will disclose it to you." (John 16:12-15 ).
These words are clearly not about Mohammed. Why should Jesus talk about a Mohammed, a man with low morality?
JAH said:Jesus used to pray to God (Eloi/Allah) putting his forehead on the ground (Matthew 26:39, 14:23), Muslims do the same.
Mohammed stole from the Bible this way of praying and included it in the Quran. That is why Muslims do it.
JAH said: - Jesus was a human (Acts 2:22) and a Prophet (Matthew 21:11, Luke 24:19). That’s exactly what Muslims believe about him.
Jesus was man and God at the same time. He Himself mentioned it as above.
JAH said:"- Jesus used to greet people using the phrase “Peace be with you”, Muslims do the same in Arabic “As-Salamu Alaikum”. Note that Jesus never spoke English!
It does not mean Jesus was Muslim.
JAH said:"- Jesus never preached any religion by the name of ‘Christianity’. The word ‘Christianity’ doesn’t even exist in Bible! In fact, he preached Islam (John 5:30), which means surrender to God’s Will. Jesus also surrendered his will to the Will of God (John 5:30)."
Jesus never preached any religion by the name "Islam". But as I mentioned earlier Jesus said the Holy Spirit would disclose things that He never said. And the Holy Spirit Spoke through Apostle Paul and others. Hence, the religion Christianity. Also, Christians and Jews surrender to the Will of the real God Yehweh not the fake Allah.
Muslims are not the followers of Jesus. Muslims are the followers of the false prophet Mohammed. It is the Quran that is absurd, illogical, irrational, and inhumane.
من بدّل دينه فاقتلوه ! ” “He
من بدّل دينه فاقتلوه ! ”
“He who changes his religion must be killed.”
Wow. I can't believe this is happening in 2009. It's evident that these Ulemas have no contact with civilized world at intellectual level. Or do they have any intellectual level to start with?
Hello JAH this is Ibn
Hello JAH
this is Ibn Kammuna, the person you like to accuse of being a "Missionary", which I am not, but that does not matter.
Listen, I saw a previous posting of you responding to FreedomFighter I think. He said that the Bible says that Satan is the best deceiver (which is correct by the way), and that Allah (the Islamic god) is called the best deceiver in the Qur'an (this is correct too by the way). You responded asking for which part of the Qur'an says that. Here is where I come in. i have published an article on the subject. The verse is right there in the article also from the holy (evil?) Qur'an. I am putting the link below to show that Allah of the Qur'an is the best deceiver (Satan?). Here is the link brother:
http://www.news.faithfreedom.org/index.php?name=News&file=article&sid=1737
Peace, we all need it inside and out.
#14 Ibn Kammuna Hello
#14 Ibn Kammuna
Hello Ibn,
There is another reason that shows that Allah is the greatest deceiver. The Quran verse 4:57 (YUSUFALI) says. " That they said (in boast), "We killed Christ Jesus the son of Mary, the Messenger of Allah";- but they killed him not, nor crucified him, but so it was made to appear to them, and those who differ therein are full of doubts, with no (certain) knowledge, but only conjecture to follow, for of a surety they killed him not:- "
Who made it appear to them so? Only Allah had the motive and only Allah could pull off such a supernatural feat. So Allah deceived them all, relatives, followers and enemies alike by tricking them into thinking that Jesus was crucified, when in reality Jesus was not. If true, it is the greatest deceit ever pulled off, so Allah is the greatest deceiver.
Actually Jesus was a
Actually Jesus was a Zoroastrian
Reasons that Jesus was a Zoroastrian
1. Zoroastrians are Monotheistic, Jesus was also monotheistic.
2.Zoroastrians don't believe in the trinity, therefore Jesus was also a Zoroastrian.
3. Zoroastrians Also pray by bowing their heads, therefore Jesus was a Zoroastrian..
Relax people, I kniow I am commiting a logical fallacy, but then again we can read into whatever we like. Afterall when Quran can contain Quantum physics why can;'t Jesus be a Zoroastrian.
@16 ibrahim, Yes Jesus was
@16 ibrahim,
Yes Jesus was Zoroastrian. He was Jew and Hindu too. He was all of this which is human. His message is for Humanity. Humanity is but one religion.
Shortly before death a disciple asked Buddha, what are you? Are you god or prophet? Buddha replied "I am just a human like you but I am awake". It's the divine awakening which is the difference between you me and Jesus.
#16 ibrahim Ibrahim:"Relax
#16 ibrahim
Ibrahim:"Relax people, I kniow I am commiting a logical fallacy, but then again we can read into whatever we like. Afterall when Quran can contain Quantum physics why can;’t Jesus be a Zoroastrian."
Hello Ibrahim,
Muslims proved Jesus was a Muslim and using their logic, you proved Jesus was a Zoroastrian. Now if a=b and a=c, then b=c. So it follows that Muslims are Zoroastrians.
The Quran not only contains quantum physics, but it contains the theories of relativity. Soon a Muslim will discover that the Quranic verse "And We have made stars as missiles to drive away the Evil Ones " is really a scientific miracle and every Muslim will exclaim in unison and in awe, "I'm speechless, Allah Akbar!".
If the qrand the terror
If the qrand the terror manual contains every thing man knows and will know in future, why the heck this mohammadean cretin is wasting time here on the site? He can read qrand only and be happy?
Currently Islam is the only
Currently Islam is the only religion in the world that punishes the apostates by death. It is strange given the fact that other semitic religions have evolved, whereas Islam continues to remain in darkness. I noticed that Quran does not advocate death for apostacy, whereas hadiths do. Why is that?
As per JAH and other muslims
As per JAH and other muslims internet and other softwares are developed from Quran.
As per muslims, the americans, Indians, jews etc who are working in Information Technology will become muslims after death or were muslims who converted to non-muslims. Just see there hypocrisity.
Taliban or pure muslims will say its the trick of dajjal or american-zionist conspiracy etc to develop internet to work against islam. In pakistan they kill people for possesing TV, cassetes etc. Taliban hates barber the most, they want people to be like rough, dirty as Islam means pure.
Currently Islam is the only
Currently Islam is the only religion in the world that punishes the apostates by death
And that is why we are fighting Islam alone.
ibrahim wrote: Actually
ibrahim wrote:
Actually Jesus was a Zoroastrian
Reasons that Jesus was a Zoroastrian
1. Zoroastrians are Monotheistic, Jesus was also monotheistic.
2.Zoroastrians don’t believe in the trinity, therefore Jesus was also a Zoroastrian.
3. Zoroastrians Also pray by bowing their heads, therefore Jesus was a Zoroastrian..
Relax people, I kniow I am commiting a logical fallacy, but then again we can read into whatever we like. Afterall when Quran can contain Quantum physics why can;’t Jesus be a Zoroastrian.
LOL.
that means i am in the death
that means i am in the death list now.
Jesus Christ was a good man and his preaching contains message of love and peace of humanity but he has his own defiency when he regarded the Gentiles as dogs and swine.
Buddha was a good man and his message comprised love and serenity of heart but he has his own defiency as well when he instituted rigid abandonment of the world which is irrelevant today. a Buddhist even prayed for the peace of all human and animal on earth as evidenced when i travelled to a buddhist country called Mongolia where i witness them performing certain ritual ceremony with these peaceful connotations. my head bows down on them.
the problem against true love of humanity rest in the Abrahamic faith. there is no exemption to those non believer from abrahamic god's hell fire. the law of apostasy was applied by christians a long time ago ( maybe 1000 years) but discontinue now thanks to the influence of freethinking and enlightenment. but islam still insist on this barbaric injunction and no reformation whatsoever is relevant in the case of islam.
Humanity is but one family. :)
20. rationalist Says:
20. rationalist Says: Currently Islam is the only religion in the world that punishes the apostates by death. It is strange given the fact that other semitic religions have evolved, whereas Islam continues to remain in darkness.
Because...they are stuck, and they can't move. They create in their own world, living in their own coccon and to them there is no other world but them. The outside world does not exist....outside world is just an illusion. We are the real world......so says them. They do not want to change......because change will bring in a whole world of difference anbd ultimatily their own death. Darkness is the only one for them .They rather live in the dark, and smell their own sweat...
I noticed that Quran does not advocate death for apostacy, whereas hadiths do. Why is that?
Because both written by the humans......as humans we are full of contradiction. We say something else.....we do another, just like their prophet. All bound to their own sense of insecurity. All this whole perception of being perfect. How often are we [including myself] being indoctrinated in our head that the prophet is the most perfect human...perfect of all perfect human, the perfect husband, the perfect friend etc... all this the classical signs of psychologic disorder......bound by their own sense of insecurity and inferior complex. Thus we the apostate are the signs that they are not perfect after all.......therefore we must be kill.....eliminated.
Hey Nurul Great to have you
Hey Nurul
Great to have you back in the Forum. Where were you all this time?
Hey Ibrahim! Oh!
Hey Ibrahim!
Oh! well.......around... in and out of FF1, reading. Wanting to response several time but due to limited online time.
kenmirzz wrote: "that means
kenmirzz wrote:
"that means i am in the death list now."
It depends on the country. Are they using sharia law or not? If the answer is no then maybe they just persecute you until you revert back.
[...] Islam’s Law of Apostasy
[...] Islam’s Law of Apostasy in Our Globalized World http://www.faithfreedom.org/2009/06/07/islams-law-of-apostasy-in-our-glo... By Jacob Thomas [...]