Islamists: 'Moderate Muslims are fair game'
Last year something significant happened in the Muslim world that has remained largely overlooked but that is important in the ongoing struggle against Islamic domination and destruction. In early 2008, a Pakistani official, Secretary General Hasham Barber of the Awami National Party, announced that Islamic jihadists were changing their battle cry from "jihad!" to "qattal!" This change may seem like a small thing—just a word, after all—but the significance of this act goes well beyond such a notion, and the jihadis are aware of it.
The word qattal in Arabic means "fighting," "violence," "killing" and "murder," which is much more straightforward as to the Islamic extremists/terrorists or Islamists' true modus operandi in the first place. As we know well from the Muslim apologists, jihad, on the other hand, can be interpreted to mean both physical battle as well as "inner struggle." Apparently, this latter "corruption" of the word has caused "true jihadis" to turn to qattal—calling themselves "qattalis," perhaps?—in order to describe their true passion, which is obviously bloodshed, murder and genocide.
What this wordplay means for Islamists is that they can now kill not only the kaffirs/infidels but they can also slaughter their fellow Muslims with impunity, and Allah will be fine with it, because they are invoking qattal against the "moderate," who by their lack of zealous bloodlust in the name of Allah and Islam are "impure."
This change will evidently also put an end to the debate as to who is "innocent" and should therefore not be killed—a debate needed, obviously, because the "religion of peace" is in reality so violent. While Islamists claiming to have a conscience (or, rather, practicing taqiyya) have asserted that they cannot kill "innocent people," we know from their own admissions that non-Muslims are not "innocent" by the very fact that they are infidels. Muslims, on the other hand, must be considered "innocent" because of their belief and should be spared. By invoking qattal, however, Islamists may slaughter "their own," as they do so often in Pakistan and Afghanistan, in order to further Islamic fundamentalism.
For Further Reading Islam: Wholesale Slaughter in the Name of Allah
what kind of crap is this? I
what kind of crap is this? I am laughing all the way. This site is a good provider of entertainment.
I guess you also believe that Americans did 9/11 and Hindus did 26/11 all because they wanted to discredit Islam. Similarly Muslims are killing Muslims by just changing a word .
I guess funadmentalists everywhere are out of brains. And this sight is the best collection of anti muslim fundamentalists.
Moderate Muslims better watch
Moderate Muslims better watch out! If we know any should we hide them. Would they hide us? Moderate Muslims do what? Do Moderate Muslims read the Quran and deny allah his due? ModeraTE mUSLIMS WHO DONT KILL US ARE DUE FOR A KILLING BY THE REAL MUSLIMS RIGHT!
What a piece of rubbish. You
What a piece of rubbish. You notice a word change and, by some twisted jumps and hoops, conclude that moderate muslims will now be killed. No coherence whatsoever.
I got this mail from one of
I got this mail from one of my friend which was in cartoon, but i am putting it in words
TERRORIST RECRUITMENT INTERVIEW ......HIGH LIGHTS REVIEW
( Q )OSAMA BIN LADEN : NAME
( A )TERRORIST : ABDUL AL - RHAZIB
( Q )OSAMA BIN LADEN : SEX
( A )TERRORIST : THREE TO FIVE TIMES A DAY
( Q )OSAMA BIN LADEN : NO, NO I MEAN MALE OR FEMALE
( A )TERRORIST : MALE, FEMAIL SOMETIMES CAMEL
( Q )OSAMA BIN LADEN : HOLY CO*
( A )TERRORIST : YES CO*,SHEEP,ANIMALS IN GENERAL
( Q )OSAMA BIN LADEN : BUT ISN'T THAT HOS TILE..?
( A )TERRORIST : HORS STYLE, DOGGY STYLE, ANY STYLE
( Q )OSAMA BIN LADEN : OHH DEAR...
( A )TERRORIST : NO, NO DEAR RUN TO FAST
I don't agree with this
I don't agree with this article. True muslim (media called it radical) would never kill the deceptive muslim (media called it "moderate"), because this "moderate" muslim are their protector in religious term. Don't believe me? Go look at indonesia, there are so many "moderate" muslim busy defending islam and symphatize with the terrorists. This article failed to see the diffference between "moderate" and hypocrite muslims.
Wasim, I have read the book
Wasim,
I have read the book written by Ali Sina "Understanding Muhammod - A pshychobiography". It describes accurately what you muslims think and feel - it is psychological. Reading your comments only confirms that you indeed are a psychopath. How can you even imagine that 9/11 was by Jews and 26/11 by hindus. Everything was caught in camera - what is there to doubt? Now, this only confirms that all of you Mohammad believers are psychopaths beyond a limit. May some god help you!!
Aware, seems you are
Aware, seems you are completely unaware that you didnt even get the pun in my comments. Thats what fundamentalism has done to you.
I myself laugh at all the fundamentalists. I believe in the Sufi Islam as given by Rumi which is open, musical, beautiful. I firmly believe in the Prophet (PBUH) .
You are like the number of Idiots in Pakistan like Zaid Hamid etc who always live and breathe conspiracies. I myself question them that Americans did 9/11 to attack Iraq but what did Hindus do 26/11 for. They did not attack anyone. And they can spin another conspiracy in guise of asking intelligent questions. Many believe 9/11 was done by americans and yet they jusify that 9/11 was okay because of Palestine. Indeed sad that they cant even choose a side as to which one is correct. Terrorism has no justification. It is condemnable.
But similarly the fundamentalist articles on this website are equally condemnable. You can not attack a religion with billion plus followers. This site is spreading hate and only hate. Sad part is neither Muslims are removing the scourge from within their religion as seems they have become overdefensive. And site like these are also not helping.
Hello wasim, refer to what
Hello wasim, refer to what 'Aware' has to say, the 9/11 terrorists and so also the 26/11 terrorists in Mumbai were captured live on television, you have not answered on this, as you are in the denial mode, your senses numbed by following the bigoted pedophile prophet who raided, looted and kept numerous women including a eight year old.
Wasim, I differ in opinion
Wasim,
I differ in opinion with you about this site and about the strategy of us Democratic people versus Muslims. We hold Muslims in high regard, but not Islam, the religion. We think Muslims are or can be rational thinking reasonable humans, like the rest of us. So, we hold them accountable, it is a sign of deep respect, because it is of no use to hold animals, children or crazy people accountable.
\We lay before them: - The contents and interpretations of their Holy scriptures. - the question why they believe this totally uncritically, while they would not be cheated in buying bad used cars etc. - the actions of Muslims in the past. - the actions of Muslims in the present. - the attitude of Muslims in control, in Islamic Countries. The treatment of Muslims of women, gay people and apostates. And we hold other Muslims accountable for their reaction or lack thereof to all that.
Of course we do this with a lot of emotion, so often we say insulting things, but reasonable people should be able to distinquish contents of complaints from tone of complaints, including insults. And if you say that that works counterproductive in the Muslim world, then let it be so. Because we are not here to adapt to unreasonable people, only to reasonable people. And they will find us receptive of complaints about us, too. Even if they are clothed in offensive language. This is what our democratic culture is really all about, you see, freedom of speech, arguing reasonably, if heatedly at times.
Any way, if Democratic people were to be only polite and correct, we know what Muslims would be saying; Oh, you see? Nobody can think of any complaints about our religion or behavior, so Islam MUST be the greatest religion on earth! Much better than all the other religions, the ones we say so many bad and belittling things about. Because this enmity you speak about, is not exactly a one-way-street, hey? As you indicated you know this well.
Furthermore, in such a situation even the slightest, most polite complaint would be brushed of the table, or completely ignored by the Muslims, who would claim to be too busy with their own problems. This because it would not get their emotions in play, polite reguests would not get their attention. But now FFI, Islam Watch, Jihad Watch are playing "bad cop", now Muslims are endeavoring to look good to Western "good cops". Now Muslims all over the world know their behavior is being watched, and of course they now behave better because of that. Not wanting to give more arguments to their enemy observers. And of course their victims or potential victims now know they have allies out there, know the truth about what they say and claim ever more. And now they can defect, because the enemy of your enemy is your friend, isn't he?
So please, read the contents more , we assure you we do have positive intentions for the world, for future generations.
Dajjal, you fulfill your name
Dajjal, you fulfill your name and the only stuff that comes out of your mouth is filth. I never said 9/11 was done by americans.
Demsci, you seem debatable. The point is you can not start shouting at a person on the road just to prove that your view point is correct.
You guys are taking hold of the Hadeeths and not the Quran. Tell me one verse in Quran which spreads hate. The few verses which are blown out of proportion should be read in complete context. And this can be done by reading a verse before and after the verse.
So now give me an example but with 3 verses and I will debate out that who is mistaken. Remember give me 3 verses ..the one which you feel is hateful, the one before that and one after that. Lets debate.
Wasim, "You guys are taking
Wasim,
"You guys are taking hold of the Hadeeths and not the Quran. Tell me one verse in Quran which spreads hate. The few verses which are blown out of proportion should be read in complete context. And this can be done by reading a verse before and after the verse."
Before you boasted about that, why don't you do something first about your jihadist brothers and your islamic (hell countries). Real action, not mouth, ok. Bomb this, bomb that but those muslim are silence.
"I myself laugh at all the fundamentalists. I believe in the Sufi Islam as given by Rumi which is open, musical, beautiful. I firmly believe in the Prophet (PBUH) "
If you are a sufi, then all of this are useless to you, because sufi is a mix between islam and local spiritual faith. Sufi is heretic according to other dominant sects. Sufi in my country often clash opinion with mainstream muslim and even one of the sufi scholar cursed barbaric mainstream muslim who knew nothing about spirituality and told that quran is an adult book. This website is about real and pure islam not heretic sufi.
"So now give me an example
"So now give me an example but with 3 verses and I will debate out that who is mistaken. Remember give me 3 verses ..the one which you feel is hateful, the one before that and one after that. Lets debate."
Repetition...repetition....again. All of this are already discussed in many forums. Go check reality and real world, will ya. Because i knew it from there not books or acrobatic words.
Yes, Wasim, Mooo is right,
Yes, Wasim, Mooo is right, FFI-writers and visitors already have discussed many verses in the Quran. Much better than I could do it. But people on FFI are also delighted to debate on many other topics and we are supposed to take our clue from the articles. But thanks for saying that I seem debatable.
I do not see your point about not shouting to other people that you are right. We don't do this on the streets, or at the workplace, or at home, if it is not wanted there, we only do it on public websites. There we assert our positions and await arguments from the opposite side, what is wrong with that?
You say you are Sufi and I gather that you are Quran-only, because you want to discuss only the Quran and not the Hadeeth. Indeed most of our material about Muhammed stems from the Hadeeth. But by now we have seen many debates between Ali Sina, his co-authors, FFI-visitors and Quran-only-people too. Just browse and you will find them.
I am so glad that you despise all fundamentalists, really I am. I am curious about your position in Iran. Are you neutral, on the side of the demonstrators, or on the side of the oppressing Ayatollahs and Revolutionary guards? What is your stance on NATO versus Taliban? On Pak army versus Taliban?
Why do I get the feeling that
Why do I get the feeling that stoopid moslems think every one is as stupid as they are?
Give the verse before and after! Give three verses before and 3 after.
Do you understand classical arabic?
How do you know it'sot an nterpretational error?
Blah blah
Allah is evil
Pedo phile rpaist mohammad was a daughter chod.
Islam is pure evil.
Tesing the system.... I am
Tesing the system.... I am newly registered.
Welcome Nikephoros.
Welcome Nikephoros.