Islam and The Dhimmi India

Printer-friendly versionSend to friendPDF versionMuslims appear to consider patriotism as Najis. Recently Indian muslims issued a fatwa against the national song of India. A simple event that underlines that even after a millenia in India, the Indian mulims are muslims first and perhaps Indians second. This may provide an inkling how long the westerners may have to wait before the muslims will assimilate or integerate.


It is often hard to explain the actions of muslims in the land of dhimmis – INDIA. But, Let me try.

INTRODUCTION

Muslims redily betray their motherland for the sake of their ummah. This is once again evident by the recent happenings in INDIA. We have all heard about the various violent exploits of the muslims in India, but "politics" clouds the issue. But now the rejection of their Indian-hood reaches another level. Muslims apparently do not have a concept of nationalism but only of the Ummah. Ummah in essence is supposedly the collective worldwide muslim community. They do not have any allegiance to a motherland or fatherland. Muslims always claim to be willing to do anything for Islam, but apparently not much for either humanity or the nation where they may live.

Mullahs from Hyderabad have recently issued a fatwa against the national song of India – “ Vande Mataram” , which means “Motherland, I bow To you”. These mullahs have advised muslim parents to boycott schools where they are required to sing the national song. Why? Here is as the news was reported by an India daily newspaper Link To News:

THE ISSUE
With the new academic year set to start next week and the admission process at its peak, several city--based muftis issued a fatwa on Tuesday asking Muslims not to admit their children in schools where Vande Mataram is sung every morning. Children who are already studying in such institutions must be immediately shifted to other schools, the fatwa ordered.
Muftis, including All--India Sunni Ulema Board president Moulana Syed Shah Badruddin Qadri Aljeelani, Moulana Mohammed Hasnuddin, Moulana Mohammed Mastan Ali, Nazima Aziz and Rizwana Zarreen of Jamiat--ul--Mominath, jointly issued the fatwa when some parents approached them seeking a shariah ruling on Vande Mataram. Several schools in the city start their day with a recital of the national song. “Vande Mataram was written by Bankim Chandra Chatterjee.
"It emphasises that Indians treat their land as God. Ours is a secular country. Asking Muslims to do something like this cannot be advocated,” Moulana Badruddin Qadri Aljeelani told TOI (Times of India) after issuing the fatwa.
Even if these institutions offer quality education, they cannot force students to violate the shariah norms. Muslims cannot compromise on Kalma--e--Tayyaba, the basic pillar of Islam which says there is only one God and Mohammed is the Prophet, he added.
Parents sending their children to such schools are committing the 'Gunaah--e--Kabira'. Hence, stay away from schools which are not secular, advised Mastan Ali. According to Islam, there is only one God. The moment one starts believing in more than one God, it is treated as Shirk (anti--Islam), said Moulana Mufti Hasnuddin. School authorities should not force Muslim children to either recite Vande Mataram or any other rendition which is prohibited in Islam, Mastan Ali added.

You can find the National Song Of India , “Vande Mataram” , HERE
One wonders what is so offensive about it, that muslims are infuriated when told to hail the country with that song! Are the muslims so "literalist" that they are unable to see the love for the motherland, but can only see the love for a nation as a rival to Allah? Can Allah really be that jealous? Apparently so.

Unfortunately this attitude of the muslims is not a recent development. To fully appreciate the scope of the problem, consider some judgements by those who have examined the history of Islam in India.

Quotes On Muslims In India

The most heinous crimes which the followers of Mohammad called as jihadis or to use a more euphemistic term, Muslims, perpetrated was on peace loving Hindus in India. The entire civilization of Hindus called as Saraswati Civilization was decapitated and reduced to dust. The depth and the scope of holocaust which befell Hindus is so staggering that common human mind fails to understand this and goes blank. Vedic India, originally called as Bharatvarsha, stretched from Afghanistan all the way to Japan. murderous Muslims layed siege to glorious Bharatvarsha almost 1400 years ago and by treacherous and totally subhuman techniques succeeded in destruction and plunder of the greatest civilization that humanity has known so far.
- from Rape of a Civilization, by Kuldeep Razdan, Sword of Truth, September 4th, 1999

"The Mohammedan conquest of India is probably the bloodiest story in history. It is a discouraging tale, for its evident moral is that civilization is a precious thing, whose delicate complex of order and liberty, culture and peace may at any time be overthrown by barbarians invading from without or multiplying from within."
- W. Durant, "Story of Civilization"


In other parts of Asia and Europe, the conquered nations quickly opted for conversion to Islam rather than death. But in India, because of the staunch resistance of the 4000 year old Hindu faith, the Muslim conquests were for the Hindus a pure struggle between life and death. Entire cities were burnt down and their populations massacred. Each successive campaign brought hundreds of thousands of victims and similar numbers were deported as slaves. Every new invader made often literally his hill of Hindu skulls. Thus the conquest of Afghanistan in the year 1000, was followed by the annihilation of the entire Hindu population there; indeed, the region is still called Hindu Kush, 'Hindu slaughter'. The Bahmani sultans in central India, made it a rule to kill 100 thousand Hindus a year. In 1399, Teimur the lame is said to have killed a 100,000 Hindus IN A SINGLE DAY and that according to his own muslim historians. Koenraad Elst quotes Professor K.S. Lal's "Growth of Muslim population in India", who writes that according to his calculations, the Hindu population decreased by 8O MILLION between the year 1000 and 1525. ...We will never be able to assess the immense physical harm done to India by the Muslim invasions. Even more difficult is to estimate the moral and the spiritual damage done to Hindu India.
- from Negationism and the Muslim Conquests by Francois Gautier

The muslims stole the algebra of Arya Bhatta, but what other discoveries and advances they killed and prevented as the darkness of Islam descended upon India can never ever be known.


ORIGINS
The second caliph, Umar sent an expedition against India in 636 CE but it was unsuccessful. For thirteen centuries the Hindus have withstood, with breaks here and there and with varying degrees of success, attempts to Islamize the sub-continent.

The last "hot" war was in 1971 with the muslims of South Asia: Pakistan and Bangladesh. At the moment, Islamic efforts seem confined to fighting the jihad through terrorism, and in swelling the Muslim population of the Republic of India by over a 100 million by infiltration and by natural increase-the Muslim population growth rate is nearly double that of the Hindus. "Marry women... who will be very prolific, for I wish you to be more numerous than any other people" (Muhammad)

Islam sees India as an "unfinished business" and it is has been often declared as part of Dar-ul-Islam. It has the status similiar to Andulsia as a muslim land occupied by kaffirs and must be reclaimed by Islam. Oil-rich Muslim countries such as Saudi Arabia are spending millions trying to convert and subvert India to Islam.

I cannot possibly detail all the terror and cruelty inflicted upon the Hindus, particularly in the thirteenth to seventeenth centuries. For those who are interested in learning from history so mistakes are not repeated, a visit to view the jihadi history is absolutely essential.History of Jihad
Here are a few samplers of the period that is normally viewed as "peaceful" when Islam had conquered and the great Mughals were the undisputed Emperors of India. India was firmly under the heel of Islam and squarely in Dar-ul-Islam.

Shah Jahan

Shah Jahan (1593-1666) was the fifth Mogul Emperor, the grandson of Akbar the Great. Several dhimmi and muslim writers have romanticized his reign as being a golden era. However he was a pathological warmonger, instituting forty eight military campaigns in less than thirty years. In the meantime famine and fever often ravaged India.

As a good muslim, Shah Jahan had several wives and five thousand concubines (those his right hand posessed) in his harem. His mother was a Rajput hindu but her influence seems to have been negligible. During this "golden era" and Islamic rule, Kashmir was targeted and forcible "reverts" to Islam were starting to appear in abundance. He ordered that all Hindu temples then recently erected or in the course of construction should be razed to the ground. In Benares alone seventy six temples were destroyed. Christian churches at Agra and Lahore were demolished. Later in the year he besieged Hugh, a Portuguese enclave, near Calcutta. The siege lasted three months. In a manner befitting the Prophet he had ten thousand inhabitants were executed. Four thousand were taken captive to Agra where they were tortured to try to convert them to Islam. Only a few converted, the remainder were trampled to death by elephants, except for the younger women who went to harems ofcourse.



Aurangzeb

Aurangzeb was one of Shah Janan's son. Dara Shikoh, the eldest, and hence the legitimate heir to the throne was very popular with Hindus, Jesuits and Muslims alike.
Aurangzeb, was a strict Sunni and a Hafiz that is he knew the Qur'an by heart. He hated his brother being friendly to the kaffirs, and had him executed on the grounds of heresy. Dara's decapitated body was paraded through the streets of Delhi.

As soon as Aurangzeb became Emperor, he declared himself Khalifa of the whole Muslim world. He imposed Sharia and appointed a Muhtasib, a censor of public morals for every city in his empire, to enforce the Islamic laws. Drinking, gambling and illicit sex relations were made punishable crimes. (Is this 1659 or 1999 with the Taliban or 2006 Saudi Arabia? )

The Muhtasib saw to it that the Muslims did not omit the five daily prayers and the fasts of Ramadan as they still do in Saudia Arabia of today. The death penalty for apostasy from Islam was strictly enforced.
Aurangzeb considered himself "The Scourge Of The Kafirs" and closed Hindu schools and libraries. In his lifetime he destroyed more than 10,000 Hindu, Buddhist and Jain temples and often erected mosques in their stead. In Agra he hacked off the limbs of the recalcitrant Hindu King Gokla and a little later several thousand revolting Hindus were slaughtered in Mewat. (Yes the muslims used the word slaughter even back then, just as they used it in describing the brutal killing of the two young americans in Iraq. After all, that is what their Allah commands.).

Sikh Guru Tegh Bahader on the behest of the hindus of Kashmir who had been facing forced and often brutal conversions since the time of Shah Jahan protested to the Great Mughal. Instead of justice, Aurangzeb gave him the choice of Islam: convert or death. To persuade the Sikh Guru, Aurangzeb had a sikh disciple burnt alive, and another disciple sawn into halves while conscious and held in a large wooden vice. A third disciple was boiled alive in a huge cauldron, and when Teg Bahader still refused to "revert" to Islam the guru was beheaded.

Aurangzeb's rule is filled with such brutality and enforcement of Sharia and perhaps for that reasons the muslims of India and Pakistan and Bangladesh remember Aurangzeb as a pious and a religious muslim. Aurangzeb is lauded by the muslim historians for living a "poor simple but pious life" and is remembered as a heroic muslim.

The memories of the non-muslims are very different, but for the sake of "multicultralism" and peace and harmony between the muslims and the non-muslims, the dhimmis of India gloss over their own history. History books hide the violence and cruelty with euphemism while the "golden era" is trumpted in sharp contrast.

And, now a little from the recent history.

PARTITION OF BANGLADESH

Between the pledges of safety being offered by the muslim leaders and the urging of Gandhi, thirteen million non-Muslims-Hindus, Buddhists and Christians chose to stay in East Pakistan. They faced the reign of Islamic terror right from the start. The non-muslims were blamed for all of the shortcomings in East Pakistan and its Muslims were rallied against the Hindus in particular. The government raised slogans such as: "Islam is in danger from the kaffir Hindus" and distributed firearms and other weapons to the bigoted Muslim masses. Property was forcibly taken over. Hindu women were abducted in large numbers causing polygamy among the faithful to become easy and popular once again.

Islam became the acronym for Intolerance, Slaughter, Loot, Arson and Molestation of Kaffir women.

In 1950, nearly half a million Hindus were slaughtered in East Pakistan. And the slaughter was accomplished with horrendous brutality. About 4.5 million East Pakistanis crossed into India but eventually the "Secular" Indian government prevented refugees from crossing into its territory to prevent "communal" violence between the hindus and the muslims in India itself. Eight million Hindus were left behind living in constant fear for their safety.

Between 1951 and 1970 four million more refugees slipped across the border into India fleeing from the religion of peace and its laws. Their lands and propeties were confisicated by the Pakistani government, and supposedly placed in a national escrow and distributions to be made when all issues with India were to be settled. In the mean time, the non-muslims fleeing the peace being offered by Islam were left penniless and homeless on the streets of Indian Bengal.

Even left on their own, the muslims of the west and the east pakistan could not live as muslim brothers in a happy ummah. In 1971 a civil war was fought and an independent Bangladesh came into existence. In the process, however, three million were massacred by the Pakistani muslims who were being urged to kill the kaffir hindu and the "half-kaffir" bengali muslims. As the Pakistani Major-General Sawkat Reza remarked: "We have undertaken this noble work in the name of our religion....". Two hundred thousand
minority women were raped and many of them then brutally killed by bayonets exhibiting crazed sexual sadism. Many women were shipped to Saudi Arabia and sold into slavery which continued clandestinely. The money from these sales went into the coffers of Pakistan.

The strategy of Islam, as always, is to ultimately reduce the number of kafirs (unbelievers) to zero. Bangladesh achieved this in northern Mymensingh which in 1947 had nearly 90% Christian population. Because of brutal persecution in 1964 and 1971 all the Garo Christians slipped into India. Similarly, the Hill Chittagong District was 98% Buddhist in 1947. Denied asylum in India most have fled to Arakan in Burma.

The eleven million dhimmis are literally second-class citizens in Bangladesh. All government jobs are denied to them; nor are they allowed access to higher education. The Munir Committee on the Shariat stated: .... . they will not be full citizens; they will have no voice in the making of the law, no rights to administer the law and no rights to hold public office."

Taslima Nasreen, an apostate of Islam, has written about the atrocities against the non-muslims and her book "Lajja" (Shame) was promptly banned in Bangladesh and a "mullah" group put a price of 50,000 taka on her head in 1993. But living upto the dhimmi label, India banned the book as well, and now the book still stands banned in a few states of India.

The atrocities against the non-muslims continued in the western half of Pakistan,and the sordid tale continues to the present. The difference is that what the hindus of India knew and felt and lived through now faces the non-muslims outside of India. The difference is that the muslims are not rulers there yet. Perhaps the tale and history of europe where it met the Ottomans would be similar and for them the above nightmare I recite is familiar territory.




CONCLUSION
There is an ancient saying in India “Sama,Veda,Dhana,Dandam” are the 4 four basic methods by which every man can be dealt with(the names come from some hinduism scriptures I suppose). A brief explanation is:

Sama:This is the first method that anyone adopts. You merely tell a person "this is to be done"

Veda:In this,the person has not followed/does not wish to follow Sama,so you tell him"if you do this ,this is what you reap and if you dont this is what you lose"

Dhana:Our friend does not follow Veda either so you tell him "if you do this, I shall reward you with this"

Dandam:Our friend is really lame and does not follow Dhana either so you tell him "Look here buddy,if you dont do this i'm gonna beat you up"

The achievement of ISLAM is that, it has brought itself a reputation such that the world community seems to feel that Dandam is the only way by which muslim arrogance can be brought down! Because an arab understands Arabic better, a Briton understands English better, an aggressor understands aggression better when everything else fails. When a tree doesn’t grow as expected, its roots are supposed to be examined rather than pondering over its leaves and branches. Root for all muslim hypocrisy and aggression is ISLAM, the evil ideology founded by an imposter prophet. Unfortunately, it’s the bitter
truth about the predator pervert.

Compassion is for humans. As the senate member Mr. Ackerman said to muslim nations “If you want to be treated like India, Be Like India”, on the same lines , If you want to be treated like humans, behave like humans. Don’t degrade yourself following an ideology of a 7th century barbarian.

S.Prasadh