Skip to Content

The Enemy is Us

Printer-friendly versionPrinter-friendly versionSend to friendSend to friendPDF versionPDF versionFrank Gaffney, Jr. Perhaps the most famous line the history of cartoons was one Walt Kelly gave his much-beloved character, Pogo: "We have met the enemy and he is us." Increasingly, it appears Barack Obama feels the same way about America. Call it the PogObama worldview. The President's first hundred days have been a blur of legislative initiatives, policy pronouncements and symbolic gestures that, taken together, constitute the most sweeping and fundamental make-over of U.S domestic and foreign policies since at least World War II. Animating them all is a hostility towards this country's traditional values, institutions and conduct that is best described by Jeane Kirkpatrick's phrase "Blame America First." To be sure, Mr. Obama has plenty of company in this camp, both at home and abroad. "San Francisco Democrats" (another Kirkpatrickism) like Nancy Pelosi and tyrants like Hugo Chávez (with whom the President did "high fives" over the weekend) and Saudi King Abdullah (to whom the President bowed two weeks ago) are of a mind: The United States owes the world myriad apologies for its arrogance, unilateralism, aggression and other sins. And it needs to make amends in various, substantial and ominously portentous ways, including the following: Releasing the so-called "torture memos": The President pandered to the Left last week by ignoring the advice of five past and present CIA Directors and declassifying several Top Secret legal memoranda. They lay out in excruciating detail what "enhanced interrogation techniques" could be used in extreme circumstances to secure information being withheld by al Qaeda and other high value enemy operatives. While Mr. Obama says that those who followed these guidelines will not be prosecuted, he has, as a practical matter, invited their prosecution by others. Certainly, he left the door open, both here and overseas, to inquisitions of the memo-drafters and their superiors by Spanish judges, witch-hunters in the U.S. Congress, prosecutors with the International Criminal Court, etc. By effectively declaring "open season" on those in the Bush administration who helped secure this country in its time of need post-9/11, Mr. Obama is wronging dedicated public servants who acted in good faith and who prescribed techniques well short of torture. (As David Rivkin and Lee Casey point out in Monday's Wall Street Journal, thousands of American servicemen have been subjected to such methods for decades as part of their survival training). He is also opening his own team to similar jeopardy, perhaps for killing innocent civilians with their Predator strikes in Pakistan or attacks now said to be under discussion on putative Somali "terrorist camps." Undermining U.S. sovereignty: Mr. Obama is embracing sovereignty-sapping treaties, theories of "universal jurisprudence" and individuals like State Department Legal Advisor-designate Harold Koh who espouse them. The desired result evidently is a world governed by international norms and bureaucrats, rather than one dominated - or even forcefully led - by bad old America. Cutting America's power-projection capabilities: The defense budget reductions recently unveiled by Secretary of Defense Robert Gates seem to have one thing in common: They will diminish the United States' ability to extend its global reach for the protection of this country and its interests around the world. For example, Messrs. Obama and Gates propose to cancel: the C-17, America's indispensable airlifter; the F-22, the world's best fighter/attack aircraft; and the Army's Future Combat System, a comprehensive and long-overdue modernization program for that service's armored forces. They would also truncate the purchase of F-18 E/Fs, the backbone of naval aviation, evidently as a precursor to reducing the number of operational aircraft carriers. Missile defense programs will be ravaged. There will be no modernization, ever, of the nation's nuclear deterrent. And the industrial base needed to support all of the above will be allowed to atrophy and/or be sold off to foreign powers keen to manufacture the superior weapon systems we no longer will. Trying to appease America's adversaries: Mr. Obama's is determined to normalize relations with literally every one of the world's bad actors - notably, Vladimir Putin's Russian kleptocracy, Iran's incipient nuclear mullahocracy, the Castro brothers' island gulag, the megalomaniacal Kim dynasty in North Korea, the spreading and virulently anti-American axis in our own hemisphere led by Venezuela's Chavez and the Muslim Brotherhood and other Shariah-adherent entities - without regard to their continuing, dangerous behavior or ambitions. By associating himself with these hostile powers' critiques of the United States and by acquiescing to many, if not all, of their demands, Mr. Obama may temporarily cultivate the illusion of having improved bilateral relations and America's "image" internationally. Unfortunately, it is absolutely predictable that - in the absence of systemic changes in these and other despotic regimes the President is romancing - any "improvements" will come at the Free World's expense. And the image America will ultimately project is that of an emasculated, formerly great power, easy prey for those who seek not just to displace, but destroy, it. Under these circumstances, those of us who reject the PogObama view of the United States have our work cut out for us. Fortunately, most Americans do not see their country as "the enemy." It is time for legislators and other leaders who prize our sovereignty, who recognize the importance of preserving and wisely using our power and who understand that our true foes are numerous, elsewhere and being emboldened to enlist the public in challenging Team Obama's agenda, before it brings us to grief. FamilySecurityMatters.org Contributor Frank J. Gaffney Jr. is president of the Center for Security Policy and a columnist for the Washington Times.
0
Your rating: None

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Hopefully, some of the people

Hopefully, some of the people who voted for Obama will wise up, understand their error, and make him a one term president in 2012.

He is contributing to a more dangerous world and these dictators will take advantage of him (and US).


Not understanding all of this

Not understanding all of this article precisely and not knowing nearly as much as its author I still like to comment on part of it.

It may be ashame that Obama normalizes relations with hostile tyrannical governments, yes. I would prefer it if he initiated a league of Democratic Nations, like John McCain promoted. First making sure to let America support them, cooperate with them as best America can. Standing united against all these dictatorial regimes.

We democratic people have clear apprehensions and criticisms of Islam. We try to tell the Muslims about these and we hope they will listen to us, reason with us. But to stimulate that we have to listen to them, be reasonable to them. We have to give a good example. Almost every time we issue a rebuke to the behavior of past or present Muslims, Muslims and Culture-relativists are countering it by comparing these with the behavior of past or present democratic governments, organisations and people. In a way Democrats and Muslims compete and I see this as beneficial to mankind.

We should react better than they often do to our criticisms, accusations. They often not even listen to, ignore or reject these. They whine about our tone, instead of about the contents of our words. Calling them disrespectfull, hate-speech, lies and deceits. They immediately point out how much worse and hypocritical we are/ were.

We have to convince them we at least heard the contents of their words, appreciate their valid points. We should not whine about their tone, disrespect, unjustness. We should measure behavior of both sides as fairly as possible with single, equal standards. And we cannot afford to treat Muslims unfairly, arrogantly or cruelly, with torture.

We should admit our mistakes, as we want them to admit theirs. And appreciate their good points, as we want them to appreciate ours. And if our direct opponents are totally unwilling to do that, rest assured there are many third parties, who observe and listen. Most of all those who are wronged by our adversaries (and if we have wronged people, them too). They are the judges and juries to convince.

In fact, we can much benefit from Muslims' criticisms, blames, when we examine each one, catalogue them all, adding every new unique one. After all, how many really new ones can they keep issuing? Then we can try to improve our thoughts and conduct, by striving for the opposite of all these criticisms and accusations, regardless of whether we were "guilty" or not. When we by and large ever more succeed with this, never perfect, but behaving more beneficial + less detrimental, we can then confidently let them compare our attitudes and conducts with that of their own leaders and compatriots.

As I see it, we have a trump card over them. We are prepared to learn maximally from our mistakes, even if only alleged, improve our beliefsystems, much more than they are, with their book with permanent message of God.