Does Freedom of Religion in America Cover Jihad?
Submitted by Dave Gaubatz on Mon, 03/02/2009 - 09:54
Printer-friendly version
Send to friend
PDF versionBy: Dave Gaubatz
I believe Americans are extremely frustrated about a number of things, including the sad state of our national security and the declining economic situation. They are rightly concerned about their children's future. They are losing interest in socialism taking over the news media. Many I have talked with no longer want to listen, read, or watch people ranting about how our country is secure. They are annoyed with the news headlines that focus on ladies who have eight babies and the multi-year "Aruba case."
Americans have little patience and want people who "allegedly" know the situation our country is currently in to come to the point and fix the problem, not respond to incidents after they have happened. A good example of this is the manhunt for the former student of a high school in Georgia who allegedly has a gun. This is a legitimate concern, but the threat is 100 times higher within just a few miles of many schools throughout America. (A hint to law enforcement: Go to any inner city school in the U.S. and within a mile in any direction, there are gang members with guns.) Instead of locking down the school, it would be safer for the children to immediately be removed and allow their parents to protect them. The last tactic that should be tried is to have hundreds of students in a school surrounded by hundreds of armed law enforcement officers and possibly a student with a gun. There is more chance of students being harmed in crossfire by staying than if they left the school.
There is another danger in Georgia that few people are talking about.
I have conducted first-hand research in Islamic Centers throughout Georgia. The Imams in many centers are telling the children to hate America, hate Israel, and to kill anyone who does not adhere to "pure Islam." During the last two weeks I have conducted first-hand research at many Islamic Centers in Tennessee. It's a very, very, dangerous situation. Muslim children are being encouraged by their Islamic leaders (trained in Saudi Arabia and Pakistan) to follow Islamic terrorists like Ali Al Timimi (convicted and currently in U.S. prison for advocating terrorism against the U.S.) The Muslim children throughout the U.S. are being encouraged to learn how to use guns, bombs, and other weapons for the sole purpose of being utilized in Jihad Qital (physical Jihad) against their enemies in America.
In Blacksburg, Virginia, there is an Islamic scholar advocating to the students at Virginia Tech to commit treason against the U.S., instill Sharia Law, and to study the works of Islamic terrorists in order to meet these objectives.
How much do Fox, CBS, NBC, or other news (and I say this laughingly) outlets report on these incidents which threaten every child of every race, culture, and religion? Do the law enforcement officers who are our "first-line" defenders respond in force to Islamic Centers who are advocating "sedition" against our country? No. Why not? Simply because if an Islamic scholar tells a Muslim child to kill other students who do not follow "pure Islam," or if the scholar tells husbands to beat their wife, or if the scholar informs Islamic Jihadists in America how to stay current on new weapons technology (such as biological and radioactive weapons) it is considered religious freedom. As an American I do not believe that when anyone tells a child to kill others and to commit treason against our country it is covered under any religion (even if told to the child in an Islamic school).
God help Islam if the best examples they can use as role models are Ahmad Sakr, Siraj Wahhaj, Ali Al Timimi, and Abul Mawdudi.
The following is a statement being streamed through the Internet to Muslims in America:
"You Islam heroes: America is falling down behind the mirage, so hit it with an iron hand so it wakes up from its dream. At last we ask Allah to grant success to the Mujahedeen, to enable them, to grant mercy on their martyrs, to cure their injured, to release their captives, to unify their efforts and enable them to defeat their enemies, Ameen."
FamilySecurityMatters.org Contributing Editor Dave Gaubatz spent 20 years as an active duty USAF (Special Agent/OSI), 3.5 years as a civilian 1811 Federal Agent, trained by the U.S. State Department in Arabic, and was the first U.S. Federal Agent to enter Iraq in 2003. He is also a counterterrorism counterintelligence officer. Gaubatz currently owns "Wahhabi CT Publications" and conducts CT Research on behalf of high profile non-profit organizations. His website is here, and he can be reached at davegaubatz@gmail.com.
Chickens come home to roost,
Chickens come home to roost, masha allah!
It is instructive of the
It is instructive of the mentality and IQ of muslims that think that they can simultaneously both attack a state and demand the benefits of that state in their 'right' to do so. 'palestinians' do this on a daily basis. It merely identifies the futility of discussion. It brings home the utter nihilistic contempt muslims have both for themselves and anything else. If they want to live in this filth let them, but this cancer will be burned out from among us and their defilement of Israel will also be cleansed.
It proves that only a scorched earth policy is sufficient to deal with this. As always, Israel will lead, others will follow. There will be plenty of muslims in their own miserable places. There won't be any living as minorities anywhere, just as there are no minorities living amongst them. They will then be limited to the parasitism of feeding off themselves. islam is a parasite that kills its host, it will ultimately kill itself, the question is just how much of humanity it will take with it.
Chickens come home to roost,
Chickens come home to roost, masha allah!
You can bet on that Habshi
If a non-Muslim discusses
If a non-Muslim discusses about Jihad and other unholy aspects of Islam in a country like India, the media immediately categorises them as fundamentalists. Wonder why Indian media gives biased reports? Let us see who owns majority of the media in India. (Many nationalist people are planning to start an alternate media soon). I don't understand why church organisations side with Communists and resolve in bashing majority religion all the time.
NDTV: Funded by Gospels of Charity in Spain that supports Communism. Indian Communist, Prannoy Roy, is a key member of this channel.
India Today : Run by NDTV
CNN-IBN: This is 100 percent funded by Southern Baptist Church with its branches in all over the world with HQ in US.
Times group list: Times Of India, Mid-Day, Nav-Bharth Times, Stardust , Femina, Times now (24- hour news channel) and many more. Times Group is owned by Bennet & Coleman. ‘World Christian Council’ does 80 per cent of the Funding.
Star TV: It is run by an Australian, who is supported by St. Peters Pontificial Church Melbourne.
Hindustan Times: Owned by Birla Group (Pro Nationalist)
The Hindu: N Ram, a Communist supporter is the Head. However it was recently taken over by Joshua Society, Berne , Switzerland
Indian Express: Divided into two groups: The Indian Express and new Indian Express (southern edition) ACTS Christian Ministries have major stake in the Indian Express and latter is still with the Indian counterpart.
Eeenadu: Still to date controlled by an Indian named Ramoji Rao. It is a pro-Nationalist channel.
Andhra Jyothi: The Muslim party of Hyderabad known as MIM along with a Congress Minister has purchased this Telugu daily very recently.
The Statesman: It is controlled by Communist Party of India.
Kairali TV: It is controlled by Communist party of India (Marxist)
Mathrubhoomi: Leaders of Muslim League and Communist leaders have major investment.
Asian Age and Deccan Chronicle: Is owned by a Saudi Arabian Company with its chief Editor M.J. Akbar.
Gunmen attack SL cricketers
Gunmen attack SL cricketers in Lahore
Last Updated: March 03, 2009 11:00 IST
Gunmen killed at least four people in an attack on the Sri Lankan cricket team’s bus on Tuesday as it drove to the Gadaffi stadium in Lahore [Images], according to witnesses and cricket officials.
Sri Lankan media, quoting the sports minister, said four players received minor injuries in the attack — Kumar Sangakkara, Ajantha Mendis [Images], Thilan Samaraweera [Images] and Tharanga Paranavithana.
Pakistan television channels said four people were killed.
A witness told Reuters he believed two police commandos were killed along with a regular policeman and a traffic warden. Shopkeeper Ahmed Ali said the two police commandos had been driving behind the team bus when they were hit.
“It was a very heavy firing and I heard at least two explosions at the time,” said a Reuters witness who had been on his way to cover the Test match between Pakistan and Sri Lanka [Images].
Pakistan only invited the Sri Lanka team to tour after India’s team pulled out with security concerns following the militant attacks on the Indian city of Mumbai [Images] in November.
According to PTI, the incident took place when the Sri Lankan team was attacked by around 10 armed gunmen near the Liberty Chowk which is close to the stadium.
“The firing took place from at least four sides and continued for some minutes,” one police official said.
One explosion was also heard at the stadium, PTI adds.
The attackers later escaped in separate groups.
The liaison officer of the Pakistan team said players of the host nation have been sent back to the hotel.
“The Sri Lankan players are presently safe at the Gaddafi stadium [Images] and they are getting treatment,” one PCB official told PTI.
Sources also claimed that the police had received a threat on Monday that the Sri Lankan team would be attacked so a different route was used to transport the team to the stadium.
“The firing took place from at least four sides and continued for some minutes,” one police official said.
“There were 12 masked gunmen,” Lahore police chief Habib-ur Rehman told reporters, adding that police battled against the assailants for about 25 minutes.
“They appeared to be well-trained terrorists. They came on rickshaws. They were armed with rockets, hand grenades, kalashnikovs,” he said.
Television channels aired footage of at least two of the gunmen, one of them wearing shalwar kameez and other jeans and a jacket. Both were armed with assault rifles and carrying backpacks.
Police cordoned off the area immediately after the attack and launched a search for the gunmen. The driver of the cricket team’s bus drove away from the spot immediately after the firing started.
“We are assessing the situation,” Pakistan Cricket Board chief Ejaz Butt said.
“Five policemen who were providing protection to the team sacrificed their lives,” he added.
All non-muslim teams and weak
All non-muslim teams and weak muslims need to stop trying to appease Muslims.
Americans live such a good life they just cant imagine why people who they have shared food technology weapons want to kill them. Most Americans are not knowledgeable about Islam or Muslims. The elite in Amrica seem to think that the Marxist and Commies and Muslims are just fine and hate the people who made America great. Harvard was taken over by the Marxist in the 1900s
and many Americans supported the Democratic Socialist named Adolph Hitler.
Henry Ford the car maker was a supporter of Hitler. Germans were first people to created the automobile. With the acceptance of Darwin, this led to the acceptance of Evolution and the demise of Christianity which taugh creation. This lead to any ideology anti-Christians and today we see the results of this tradegy. 9-11, over 12,000 terrorist acts since 9-11. The black Americans are the most useful idiots on the lower societal branch. The Muslims found out that the Europeans never told the truth about the slavery and now Muslims are gertting over like a fat Arab cat. The word is getting out that it was Arab Muslims and the stupid and scared African Blacks from East Africa bowed down to Allah to save their lives. Then they captured other Black Africans and sold to the Portugese, Spanish, and Europeans. Muslims captured white Europeans called SLAVs, a word slaves came from. White slaves were called mamluks and black slaves were called abeds. Abed were the only people Muhammad made fun of and never married a Black African. Mary the Coptic Slave was white skinned and pretty as Egyptians were Berbers. Thanks to sane escapees from Islam of the Black variety are coming forward and telling the truth. Arab women are too. Black men love the 4 wives crap, but the women who entertain it are STUPID as disease is rampant among Muslims. Child abuse is too. Freedom of religion does not apply to evil sex practices and thighing babies. FGM is also a part of Islam yet Muslims do it. Are only men to enjoy sex? Only Muslims men. Women I know decide whether they want to marry a man or not. If they dont like the man, they tell him and if he still keeps on bothering her, she calls the cops for harassment.
Muslims cops are suppose to refuse you assistance if you have a cross, or picture or a dog in your house. This applies to fire fighters. Americans said NO. Find another job!
Americans Blacks have told Black Muslims they are not any better than a Black Jew, Christian, or anyone else. If they dont like it go to Arabia. Besides God only told the Jews in Moses day NO PORK, no one else. So leave me alone, and let me eat my pork chops, chitterlings, and pig feet because everything God made was GOOD.UMM (smile)
Thank you Dave. your piece
Thank you Dave. your piece reminds me of this:
The role of the Mosque
“Mehrab (mosque) means place of war, the place of fighting. Out of the mehrabs, wars should proceed. Just as all the wars of Islam proceeded out of the mehrabs. The prophet had sword to kill people. Our Holy Imams were quite militants. All of them were warriors. They used to wield swords. They used to kill people. We need a Caliph who would chop hands, cut throats, stone people. In the way that the messenger of Allah used to chop hands, cut throats, and stone people.”
Ayatollah Khomeini, 1981, on the commemoration of the birth of Mohammed
p. 52, Understanding Mohammed by Ali Sina
Jihad is exist in every
Jihad is exist in every religion .. just change the name only .... SO WHAT????
American Indians and Chinese
American Indians and Chinese and African tribes and European tribes attacked each other, but not for religion. For power! Islam did it for religious/political power.