Contact Us

Editor's Note: I am leaving this comment as is to show our readers how not to comment. Also, it shows the intellectual level of Muslims' reaction to the thoughtful challenges to Islam by our brother Ali Sina

u vl repent it later u son of bitch!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

hope to c u in hell as roasted ,grilled ,ali sina u bastard,
i might be the most awaiting person to c u in hell.good bye.may allah soon send u to hell u fuckin ass.!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

but but but
as a muslim,

let me say one thing

may allah show u the right way!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!and u become the greatest admirer of islam

may god make it true
good bye the son of satan!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

ali sina,
i saw your open letter to brother idris tawfiq.....well, when God had guided him to the truth no one can make him go astray and when God had led you astray no one can guide you to the straight path.

brother idris tawfiq never have intention to become a muslim but he found the truth, he was not kind of looking for errors in islam as he knew this religion is the true religion of God through his own research. and you will only look for the errors and deny the truth, the errors of your own inventions. you judge islam based on the actions of the muslims. maybe some of the muslims they are not a practicing muslims just like you. and all know that human are full of flaws.

you think you can stop people from embracing islam... you are wasting your time............millions of people are coming into this religion every year eventhough muslims did not go to their door steps to preach islam.
do your research see how people embrace this religion. they discover this religion on their own.

isnt that amazing.

YOU THINK YOU CAN STOP ALLAH FROM MAKING THIS RELIGION A VICTORY.
DON'T THINK, YOU DON'T EVENT CAN STOP ALLAH FROM MAKING YOU GETTING OLDER AND OLDER DAY BY DAY AND THEN MAKE YOU DEAD. HE DELAYED YOUR LIFE IN FACT HE IS ABLE TO MAKE YOU DEAD AT THE TIME YOU READ THIS MESSAGE.

Ali Sina and his team,
I am amazed at the misconceptions and totally wrong understanding and portrayal of Islam that your web site delivers. There are good and bad people in every religion and if you start picking on the minority bad and use it to target a particular religion in the World then I am sure there will be lots to write. Islam is not a new religion. Islam is the religion from the time of our forefathers ADAM & EVE. The fact is that all the prophets sent by GOD including NOAH, MOZES, JOSEPH, SULAIMAN, ABRAHAM, JESUS, MOHAMMAD followed the same teachings of peace and tolerance and the oneness of GOD which is ISLAM. Now will you go and say that all these prophets were wrong and their followers are terrorists. If you take a toll of the innocent people killed in the World (in an unbiased analysis) you will find that it is not the so called terrorists that killed them. It is the sheer greed and arrogance of the millitarily superior powers, the cunningness of the arms dealers, oil business mafia, and the politicians etc., that has killed and continues to kill millions of innocent people. Read the truth of 9/11 and anthrax letters that were sent out and who were really behind this. Know who the real terrorists are. There are more people dying of hunger, poverty, diseases such as AIDS & cancer, malnutrition, damage to the environment than any so called terrorist can even dream of killing. You can call anyone you hate as a terrorist. For example, whom you call a terrorist may be a freedom fighter for defending his country. So be careful of what you write. By writing false information about a true religion you are at war with GOD and his creation. I hope that you will shun your ignorance and malice towards Islam and stop spreading the messages of hate and that one day you will be guided to understand things in the right perspective. If not be aware that there is life after death and you will not find any helper there nor any chance to repent at that time. What you are trying to do is because you have either become an atheist or a similar person you are trying to stop the spread of a true religion that has solutions to the problems of mankind today. In other words you are trying to destroy the hopes and efforts of people who are trying to be good and help their fellow mankind by offering them the light of Islam and take them out of darkness. But I am confident in our creator that he will not let people like you lead mankind astray and one day GOD willing you will realize that.

Abish,

I am just a concerned Western citizen, reading your letter to Ali Sina. I speak only for myself. You think that Islam is the true religion, the best way to go for persons and mankind in every aspect. I think the same in regard to Democracy and Science.

And through Democracy, we in the Western world, Europe, America, Canada, Australia, and also India, we try to to follow the rule of 51 % or more of the people. We never want to concede power anymore to the few over the many. We like all our citizens to be autonomous, especially including our women. We hate them to be subservient, like a herd of sheep. In order to achieve that, we like to give as much of our children, and all children in the world, the best education they can get, in order to think rationally, to be able to inform themselves so they can make their own choices.

If Islam is such a good religion, given by God, why can Muslims not strive to rely on fair elections? So that when Islam impresses autonomous humans with its results, they will gladly vote for its representatives? In this context can you understand why we are on the side of the demonstrators of Iran against the Islamic oppressors, the ayatollahs and revolutionary guards? And on the side of president Karzai of Afghanistan, who wants to educate children and against the Taliban, who recently destroyed 200 schools and said the elections in AFGH. were un-Islamic?

You point out that FFI/ Islam Watch/ Jihad Watch point out the bad points of Islam itself and the bad behavior of the bad muslims in a prejudiced way. BUT we feel that this brings balance to what Islamic teachers, parents, believers tell their followers, children, fellows, namely that: Israel, America, the other faiths and their followers are much worse than Muslims, that they believe and do so many stupid and atrocious things. Criticism, insults now just simply is a TWO-way-street, not just the ONE-way-street you described.

Do you think we can exchange what both sides tell the world about themselves and each other and come to some rapprochement about all faiths being roughly equal in value, by and large, therefore all followers of all faiths submitting to democratic rules as a beautiful goal? I think that "our war would be over" then.

I'm so sick and tired of listening to this " oh, terrorists are the MINORITY ".....

Then who the hell were those thousands of people in Libya CELEBRATING the arrival of a bombing piece of shit? WHO? WHO, you lying, two faced creepy Muslim SOBS?

Celebrating someone who SLAUGHTERED men woman boys girls!!!????

THose "people" who were celebrating are as guilty as the sob who planted the bomb. There is NO difference.

Ali Sina, you are right. You can't reform something that was made up centuries ago and the followers are so effen stupid that they still think those ignorant rantings should be followed today.

Netherlands is seeing what happens when this Muslim plague starts to grow uninhibited. Can the world LEARN from this or just sit back and die of appeasement?

"The islamic terrorist struck out at Spain in order to change the outcome of the upcoming elections, and thanks to the total cowardice of a large majority of spanish "people", they succeeded. Those voters turned their backs on those unfortunate victims. They had a chance to stand up, and failed miserably"

I can understand the frustrations of some people writing on this board because no one has explained them the truth and the media does not present the true picture either.

We can have endless arguments on what is the definition of a terrorist and who is a terrorist?

For example, if a man straps a bomb on his body and blows himself up to take revenge for injustice to either his family or his nation, some may call him a terrorist, right? Why because he has killed a few people. Well for the sake of argument let us say that it is wrong because some innocent people were killed and I agree that killing of innocent people is wrong.

Following the same argument we must also condemn in strongest words, the state sponsored wars where scores of people were killed and continue to be killed even today, but I don’t see any discussion on this subject on your web site? For example, atomic bombs dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki, World Wars I and II BOTH KILLING MILLIONS, Vietnam war, Iraq war, Palestine war, cold war between Russia and United States resulting in over 1.5 million Afghan casualties and many injured, Iraq war where over 1 million lives of civilians including women and children have been taken, civil war in Rwanda where over 800, 000 people were killed and the list goes on and on............ not to mention the environmental destruction caused by those wars.

These are some of the lessons from our history.

Suggest that most appropriate name for this web site would be:
faith-free dumb. org
as most information given is propaganda and rhetoric,
based on prejudice and it is
full of hatred.

The Islamic world is so cruelly against any remote criticism against their religion or their prophet. people like Salman Rushdie (their list much big) still live under ground as per my knowledge. But how your goodselves attacking so boldly. It is a wonder for me. How this website is being run. Hats off to your guts. I pray God to give you strength in continuing your efforts for giving the mankind freedom of thought and rational thinking.

Mr Sina

You better read the writings of Dr Zakir about your questions and watch his debates with other great scholars with honest neutrality in mind. Then if you still see you can debate with Dr Zakir, then call one of his youngest student (may be his son who could be 12 years old) to debate with you. I think that will satisfy your mind. I read some of your comments these are baseless.

Do you never grow up?

Do you like to judge 1,2 billion muslims just by the actions of few?

To some people, the response to this web site's content is intolerable! and they have sympathy with people like Salman Rush to die.
Please take the dictionary and read the meaning of the word - criticism, then you will understand that this web site is not just about criticism, but hatred, blasphemy, false propaganda, marginalizing a group of people, utter disrespect to God, the sacred scriptures and the Prophets of God, and much much more...
Does freedom of speech mean that you can say just about anything to anyone?
Even if you try to abuse the parents of a small child in the vulgar manner you have abused a group of people and their religion, you will find that the child will return back to you with a similar response. Same goes with your so called criticism and if you do that to others then be prepared to receive the same to some extent atleast. If you dont like it then you should condemn the person who started this saga, not us.

I would like to react to Hannah and Aman, even although I confess I am imperfect and there is a lot I do not know. No, for a long time now we know that we should not paint all Muslims with the same brush, if that is the correct saying. Muslims are very divers, and it seems to us there are a lot of versions of Islam, in theory and practice.

And about our criticisms-insults-exposing first the deeds of some Muslims and linking that to the Islamic Holy Scriptures, Quran and Hadith. First of all; this is a 2-way-street and thank God now FFI/ Jihad Watch/ Islam Watch and others, now inform us about the constant vilification of Israel and America and the West, in Islamic media, Mosques. if anything what FFI/ Jihad Watch/ Islam watch insult is peanuts compared to what a part of the Muslims do.

Then, yes, the followers of other beliefs, united here, have political goals, namely equality in rights between Muslims and followers of other beliefs in Islamic countries, where this is blatantly absent. FFI informs us about the killing of apostates from Islam, even by law, even with heavenly rewards for apostate-killers. Look at the reverse-situation; Christians, all followers of other beliefs can become Muslims totally unopposed. This is grossly unfair and we followers of other beliefs abhor it. We are puzzled why most Muslims even WANT to play that blatantly FALSE. Considering that you think Islam is so superior, why don't Muslims try to win on Merits alone, through the ballot-box alone, in all the Islamic countries? Why don't a big group of Muslims not guarantee and support democracy and absolute women-autonomy in Europe-America-Canada-Australia, the countries who are the most attractive for immigrants in the world, hence the countries with the fastest growing Islamic minorities.

Now what if these fair political goals get nowhere amongst the Muslims, who in part oppose them, threathen them and in part are mostly silent about them? What if Muslims constantly side with these people amongst them that promote male chauvinism and a dictatorial sharia-state, a Theocratic Khalifate?

This site and others like it is the reaction to those Muslims who have dictatorial attitude/ behavior and those who remain silent about it. And the initiators of these sites argue that Muslims, in large numbers, (so NOT ALL), cannot change, cannot really be trusted. So, they argue further, let us expose Islam. So that many in the end will leave it, and we will have peace that way. Also let us expose Islam, so that Muslims can see the following; - Yes, the the followers of other beliefs did many atrocious deeds in the past. But the Muslims also, and still a part of the Muslims behaves atrociously. So; Islam is NOT superior. And Islam has no supremacy-rights anywhere, not even in Islamic countries, just equal rights to all other beliefs is acceptable.

And because of these reasons; Muslims will be monitored-observed, reported about and exposed, and the comments and reactions will be highly insulting, but peacefull. And only in the public space, so not in the homes or workplaces of people. Until one of 2 developments happen; either Muslims leave Islam in droves. or broadminded-openminded Muslims engage in a meaningfull dialogue, making concessions until all followers of all beliefs have equal rights and opportunities both in Europe-America-Canada-Australia AND in the Islamic countries. And with equal rights too for men and women. And then one of these 2 developments will bring peace, cooperation, common positive goals, common other opponents.

First of all bism el lah elrahman elrahim
I don t want to insult you Ali Sina cos I m not from this level either my relegion . This site will not change people s minds (muslim) and you don t know anything about our relegion cos our relegion is based on peace but the terrorists don t know that this is why they aren t muslims and you re looking on these terrorists who don t know their relegion and you think that this is the islam . I will say no this isn t the islam and I must say that you would change your mind if you just know the islam

Demsci,
Islam is a true religion and there is no doubt about it.
There is one problem! It is one of the most misrepresented religion, also Muslim world has not been correclty portrayed either.
The point I am trying to say is that Islam and Muslims are nothing like what is shown in the Hollywood movies or on this web site.
For years and years arabs have been vilyfied (in movies) as bad guys and terrorists, just like the African people who have been colonized and enslaved by..............!
The reality is that terrorists donot grow in fields like carrots and mushrooms! and they donot belong to any particular religion either.
Islam does not teach terrorism period! You should know that if you have read the holy Quran. In fact Islam sanctifies dignity of human beings by protecting their rights.
Terrorism is a practise of some non-Islamic people that some very tiny fraction of helpless and marginalized people may have adopted due to attrocities they may have suffered in life.
In Islam you have solutions to the problems mankind is facing today. You have a lots to gain in Islam even more than any democracy can offer today. Only if you shun the hatred and stop propating the false information then your mind will open to understand the beauty of Islam and the peace and harmony it guarantees to this World and success in the next live.

Demsci,
Please if you find some of my words a bit harsh forgive me. It is not to hurt your feelings but I have to set the record straight and speak the truth.
Also I am not speaking on behalf of any community or organization. So you are free to accept it or not. In Islam says there is no compulsion in matters of faith for truth stands out clear against falsehoold and falsehood by its nature is boud to perish.
Do you know that women have more rights in Islam than any Democracy can offer? So why should we settle for less. Islam guaranteed more rights to women 1400 years ago than what they have today in any democratic society you can name. While in many civilizations women were treated as evil and slaves to men to be used and abused at free will. Dating and date rape and incest is so common in these days. Women are treated like cigarettes, use them and throw them. Their bodies are used and displayed shamelessly in the name of liberation to make money through nude advertisements and movies. Do you know that Islam teaches that mothers are to be treated with utmost respect, because they are of a very high status, so much so that it says Heaven lies under the feet of your mother and you can never repay back her the favours she did when you were born? This is just one instance there are many such rights that women enjoy in Islam the right of inheritance, the right to be equal to men and more in all aspects of life. That's why we say that Islam is the authentic and the most beneficial religion to mankind. In many of the warfares that take place even to this date by the so called democratic societies, women and children are the first and foremost to be killed by the cluster bombs, burned by phosphorus used in weapons, indiscriminate firing, torture etc. Whereas, Islam has laid the rules of decency that no society can match today. It says even if you are in a state of war you cannot harm innocent men, women, children and the sick or disabled people. You only fight against those who have committed agression against you. There is much more to be said on this subject, but I can assure you that Islam is the solution to our problems and the correct way of life revealed to us by God. The common mistake people make is that they look at some black sheep followers who are not good examples and then say oh! see now we can blame their religion. This is not a logical way to understand any speak of any religion. By the way stop this sayings that Islam vs the other religions.......I have friends following many different religions and we all respect one another. Sometimes we agree and appreciate the good things in other religions also but where there are disagreements we agree to diasgree in a nice way but never slander each other like the way this web site does.

Mariam and Aman,

Peace, I only want to respect you also. there is so much I yearn to say to you.

First of all, look not only at the highly insulting comments and reactions against Islam on this site. Please consider also what is causing it. Everyday FFI/ Islam Watch/ Jihad Watch put up articles about practice and behavior of self-confessed Muslims in Islamic countries, where Islam is in majority and power. Surely that is what we should look at to assess Islam? Not just what Muslims say what according to them Islam is? There are many Islam-versions, good ones and bad ones, it seems. Can't your good one confront the bad ones?

What is so hard to accept for FFI-visitors for instance is that Saudi Arabia has executed a girl that would not give up her Christian faith. That Saudi Arabia allows no building of temples or churches in its own country, yet finances the building of Mosques in Western countries. How do you think that looks in the eyes of independent observers?

Right now, someone with your name, Mariam, together with a Marzieh, sits in prison in Iran. Solely indicted for apostasy. They are now self-confessed converts from Islam to Christianity and they are jailed for it! Whereas I personally know a few converts from Christianity into Islam and we all respect their decision. I don't know how anyone can defend such blatant imbalanced injustice.

Don't you see that when you don't use democracy then inevitably you are going to suppress those who have different views? That you are treating a lot of people as subservient sheep? that a religion you so respect, forces itself on people, instead of showing how good it is? Trying to win over people by its sheer beneficialness and beauty to vote for it of their own free will?

well, we in the West did have our dictators (kings, nobles) and the church who thought they knew better than the dumb masses. but now we rely on 51 % majority vote, or more.

Hay bitch, mother fucker,

How can i meet u? then i will tell u that what is Islam. u dont know about your mother & father then how can u explain Islam.

All the Muslims curse on you and on the people like you.

Demsci,
All your questions can easily be answered. But it requires a lot of time and space to do that. As I have repeatedly mentioned on these posts please don’t look at some rare instances and point towards their religion to be blamed for. Islam is a true religion sent by God for the benefit of mankind. In fact God gives his signs to every human in their life to recognize his true religions but some of mankind ignores it to their own disadvantage. Remember we all live only once and surely we have life after the death and that is the permanent life. All mankind will be taken account for their actions by God no matter how minute they may be, in the hereafter. This is what all the true Prophet of God such as Abraham, Moses, Jesus and Muhammad (Peace be upon all of them) have told us. They were extremely honest men of God and probably the best of mankind that God ever created. Remember, we have two angels with us all the time that are recording all our actions. One recording the good ones and the other the bad ones. When we reach our final abode in the hereafter our results will be shown to us and that day many will be disappointed because they were told about the truth and still they did not believe in it. At the same time there will be many who will enjoy because they did find the truth and followed it. So never forget that there is a life after death and there is a place called Heaven and there is Hell. So let us all try to keep ourselves on the right path and try to focus on learning the truth.
In answer to your questions, Saudi Arabia has its own policy of not allowing Churches, temples and other institutions in certain areas due to some security reasons and also that they believe it is the holiest place of Islam and they have to maintain its integrity also remember like I said before Islam is the only authentic religion in existence today. What I mean by this is that I am not saying that other religions such as Judaism and Christianity, Hinduism are not true. What has happened that at their origin these were true but over a period of time they lost their true message and the message got changed with human interference. So now we don’t know what it the word of God and the word of man in it. You should also know that Holy Quran is the only book that has remained unchanged for the past 1400 years word to word as it was revealed by God to his prophet Muhammad (Pbuh). So once you know that it is a true religion of God you have to preserve it and prevent it from getting corrupted. Whereas you have many times mentioned about following democracy in your posts. While I have no objection to anyone who follows democracy, we have to understand one thing and that is democracy is a man made system and maybe they may have incorporated a few things from here and there. So you cannot compare apples to oranges. There are a large number of Muslim people living in democratic societies peacefully and you know what they have nothing against democracy or the western countries that follow it. As you know Saudi Arabia and many other Muslim countries do have non-Muslims living, working and enjoying their life just as good as those who are living in other countries. The question that I want to ask you is that how many churches, mosques and temples do we have in Israel? Please don’t give me examples of places of worship of Baha’is and Ahmadis etc. Because what they follow is not Islam, these are their own invented religions by their founders. In fact you look deep inside these religions have been created to harm Islam. The fact is that while Jews were suffering from the holocaust in Europe and other places and at many times in history it was Islam (Muslims) that offered them shelter and peace and welcomed them into their lands. But later on what happened is that Israel has taken over the lands belonging to Palestinians with no intentions of returning them and keeps torturing and humiliating them all along. How do you justify that?
Islam has a rich history. Look at the rule of over a 700 years by Muslims in India. They treated India like their home and respected people of all faith. History is full of this evidence if not other religions would not have survived and Hinduism will not have spread to the extent they are now. They would have been not forced to convert to Islam but they were not. Look what happened when the British colonial powers under the name of East India trading company entered India in the name of bringing democracy. India was the richest country in the World at that time and after they plundered and left it hanging and dry India was the poorest and also partitioned into two countries India and Pakistan with so much hatred between the two, which was mainly created and fanned by the British rulers of that time.
Look at the golden history of Islam in Spain (The Ottoman Empire). Even now noted historians write that it was a period where many Jews and Christians enjoyed high positions and financial stability. There was much advancement in science and technology during that time. That is why when people go to Spain they are so much influenced by its rich history.
I can give many more such examples. But for intelligent people who want to know the truth there are many sources on this subject and you can learn it. For me it is enough and I am convinced. Hope one day you will also be convinced.
Take care and have a nice day. May God bless us all!
Amen.

Demsci,

If you equate christian behaviour with that of some christianity professing people but not whom many christians call christ then you are wrong.

similarly consider the prophets life and his followers life for understanding Islam.

Allah help you understand all the prophets of Islam starting with Adam, Including Moses (we call him Musa) and Jesus (we call him Eesa) and ending with Muhammad. (Peace be on them all)

Ali Sina ,
please post this on your web site. It is only fair that you cover all news equally and fair manner......o.k

********
JERUSALEM – Israeli authorities indicted former prime minister Ehud Olmert today on corruption charges, the first criminal indictment ever filed against a current or past Israeli prime minister.

Olmert, who stepped down earlier this year over the corruption issue, is accused of illegally accepting funds from an American backer, double-billing for trips abroad and concealing funds from a government watchdog.

He faces charges that include fraud and breach of trust.

The charges filed in a Jerusalem court on Sunday first surfaced when Olmert was still prime minister, although Olmert allegedly committed the offenses while serving as mayor of Jerusalem and later as a Cabinet minister, before being elected prime minister in 2006.

Olmert, who denies any wrongdoing, issued a statement through a spokesman saying he was confident his name would be cleared. ``Olmert is convinced that in court he will be able to prove his innocence once and for all," the statement said.

The Justice Ministry refused to detail the length of a potential sentence, but Moshe Negbi, an Israeli legal expert, said the maximum sentence on the fraud charge alone was five years.

Any political comeback by Olmert would be highly unlikely unless he is cleared. "In the immediate future it doesn't seem possible, but it all depends on the court," Negbi said.

Two former Cabinet ministers recently sentenced in separate corruption cases have received multiple-year prison sentences. Avraham Hirchson, a former finance minister and an Olmert confidant and appointee, was sentenced to five years for embezzlement in June, and another former Cabinet minister was sentenced to four years for taking bribes.

The case that did the most damage to Olmert when he was still in office involved funds he allegedly accepted from Moshe Talansky, an American businessman who allegedly funneled large amounts of money to Olmert in cash-stuffed envelopes. Talansky's testimony last year helped turn public opinion against Olmert and played a large part in forcing him from office.

The indictment said Olmert used his connections to help Talansky's business, but did not charge Olmert with accepting bribes.

In another case, Olmert was charged with double-billing nonprofit organizations and the government for trips he took abroad and then using the extra money to pay for private trips for his family.

Olmert was replaced as prime minister in March by Likud leader Benjamin Netanyahu. He left politics and is currently a private citizen.

The charges against Olmert were part of a slew of allegations that drove down Israeli confidence in the political system during his time in office.

In addition to the charges against Olmert's finance minister, another Cabinet minister was convicted of sexual misconduct and the country's former ceremonial president, Moshe Katzav, was charged by several women with rape and sexual harassment and is currently on trial.

Ali Sina,
Going by your own twisted logic and the rules of the game that you have laid down, should someone create a web site and add incidents like the one reported in the news above and link it to the Israeli people in general and all over the World, then also blame their religion and their Prophet Moses and abuse them in the worst kind of language on earth? This is exactly what you are doing..............you liar and cheat!
What you are doing is professional blackmailing of a community you are no different than those kidnappers who take people for a ransom to meet their demands. The only difference here is that your blackmailing has been camouflaged with your so called struggle for peace and democracy. You think people cannot figure it out. You can fool some people some of the time but not all of them at all times. But know that most people in the World are sensible and we know that we dont blame a community for the crime of a few. We dont buy contents of your web site it is nothing but complete garbage and filth.

I read the ABOUT US section of the site. it says you all were muslims?
does this mean now that you disbelieve now in the prophets : jesus , moses , noah , abraham, muhammad,? peace be on them all and on those i have not mentioned

And does this mean now that you pray to other than God. as a muslim is one who BELIVES IN THE PROPHETS & PRAYS TO GOD ALONE

What are you now?

Christian? Praying to jesus, believing he is part of god?

Hindu? Praying to a statue made of mud and paint, believing each statue is a part of god?

Buddist? Praying to a statue made of gold?

Can you please show the muslims a better religion? the one you follow maybe.

Mr. Ali Sina the Atheist trying to destroy Islam. But actually Islam is benefited by Ali Sina. Mr. Ali Sina convinces people to leave Islam and also promote those people who leave Islam.
Those who leave Islam their Iman is not strong and they better known Munafi’q not Muslim(real Muslims never convinced by Mr. Ali Sina’s weak trick cause their Iman is strong). Islam don’t need disbeliever or Munafi’q, Islam need the strong believer.
In Mr. Ali Sina’s team no one can find any real hero, they all are weak in their position and believe.

Atheist = i)confused, ii)No moral value. iii) fearing about death and iv) epicurean.

Confused: They don’t know the right way. They are searching but they wouldn’t able to pick the right and they return to their religion when they are in death bed.
No moral Value: Simply think, eating human meat, rap and drugs is opposed by moral value. Eating human meat, rapping and drugs is sin; who teach it? Religion.
Moral value = good deeds.
There has no religion= no sin + no moral ethics.
Fearing about death: Atheists believe in atheisms but they hasn’t courage to sacrifice for their believe.
Life is all things for them. Try to live don’t leave or death. Try to live like rat doesn’t dead like lion.
Epicurean: Life is enjoyable and luxurious no sacrifice. Rap the poor and increase wealth.

Islam doesn’t oppose Jesus, Moses, David and other prophets and messengers. All religion spoiled by their religion’s leader. That’s why Islam say, Islam is the last and final message from Allah.

Finally I want to say, try to write a literature like Qur’an and try to live like Muhammad (D:) then shout loudly.

you don t know anything about Islam Mr Ali if you know you wouldn t do such a thing.

Mr. Ali Sina please give me some question’s answer which I put below.
1st : Adolf Hitler kill million of Jews but he’d not face any trial. Who will punish him? You believe there has no final Judgment.
2nd : Mr. Bush Senior and Junior both killed more than thousands of Muslim people including women and children. Is it their freedom of killing?
3rd : Hamas are terrorist cause they are trying to save their Freedom and Israeli’s are right cause they are occupier of Palestine. This is the judge of western country?
4th : So called Muslim Terrorists killed Muslims in Pakistan, India, Bangladesh and in Iraq. Only 3 or 4 times they attack on other religion’s people and killed very few. Why the terrorists kill Muslims and why they wouldn’t attack U.S. after 9/11?
5th : CIA tortured prisoner and they wouldn’t say or comes to any agreement to stop it. Is it their Democratic right or freedom of work?
6th : Why westerner wouldn’t pressured Myanmar to free Ong Sung Suchi?
7th : Why a person terrorist if he/she open his/her mouth against U.S’s law, their disorganized and unbalance social relation?

So many questions come to my head but I strongly believe Mr. Ali Sina will unable to give these 7 questions answer.

Mike,

The Difference is between Olmert and any Leader of any Muslim country is that he is brought to answer for his crimes by the very Government that would by your logic be the kind \Evil\ enough to cover up this kind of thing.

Now does this seem like a nation that trys to hide it's disgrace?
What purpose would it possibly serve them to admit this embarrassment?

Seems to me that it simply feeds \pro-muslim\ propaganda of which you swallow hook-line-and sinker!

See ya later-Jew Hater!

VIOLENT ANTI-SEMITISM: WAS ISLAM EUROPE’S STUDENT OR TEACHER?

John J. O’Neill

(Note: The author of the following article contends that Islam had a far greater impact on European history than has hitherto been imagined; but it was entirely negative. In the present paper he will argue that among the most corrosive ideas Islam bequeathed to Europe was a new and violent strain of anti-Semitism).

The first mass murder of Jews to be carried out in Europe occurred in Spain; in Cordoba in 1011 and in Granada in 1066. (See Bat Ye’or, The Dhimmi, p. 61. Also, Bernard Lewis, The Jews and Islam p. 54) But these pogroms were not the work of Christian fanatics: They were carried out by Muslim mobs. Thirty years after the Granada slaughter, at the start of the First Crusade, Christian mobs on the Rhineland carried out similar attacks.
From these two bare facts we may deduce the following: The source of anti-Semitism in Europe is to be sought in Spain; and the rise of anti-Semitism in other areas of Europe is intimately connected with the clash between Islam and Christianity.
Neither of the above statements is well-known or widely accepted. On the contrary, popular opinion holds by an entirely different narrative. According to this, Christianity was inherently anti-Semitic: Christians, it is believed, blamed Jews for the murder of Christ; and as soon as it became the dominant faith of the Roman Empire – after the time of Constantine – Christianity began to systematically persecute the Jews. In this view of things, anti-Semitism is a peculiarly Christian phenomenon, and if it is found in other places, such as Islam, it must have been learned from Christianity.
The above statement, as I demonstrate in my recently-published book, Holy Warriors: Islam and the Demise of Classical Civilization, is little more than a caricature: Christianity did not teach anti-Semitism to the Muslims; they had, from the very beginning, their own and peculiarly violent strain of the malaise. And indeed there are good grounds for believing that the murderous anti-Semitism which appeared in Europe for the first time at the beginning of the Crusades had much to do with the influence of Islam.

Anti-Semitism, or hatred of the Jews, in fact preceded both the rise of Christianity and Islam. Relations between Gentiles and Jews were fraught and volatile as far back as Hellenistic times, and the antagonism between Jews and Gentiles in Egypt, for example, during the second and first centuries BC led to a lively and polemical debate amongst authors such as Apion, Manetho and Josephus. In the early years of the Roman Empire, the attempts of the Jews to free themselves from Imperial rule led to a series of bloody uprisings which were suppressed with great ferocity. The Roman authorities, as a rule, were exasperated by the Jews, but tolerated what they saw as their peculiar customs, and granted them certain unusual privileges, such as an exemption from the requirement of offering sacrifice to the Emperor.
From the very beginning, of course, the Jews, or rather, the Jewish authorities, were deeply antagonistic towards Christianity; a faith they looked upon as little more than a dangerous heresy. There is evidence that they would, as Gibbon puts it “gladly have extinguished the dangerous heresy [Christianity] in the blood of its adherents.” (Ch. 16) It is pointless to go through the various animosities that existed at this time between the two groups, yet there is clear evidence that, well into the third century, Jewish religious leaders agitated in favor of persecuting Christians, and harbored much hatred towards them. This needs to be said, for early Christian writers are frequently attacked for their animosity towards the Jews. There currently exists on the internet, for example, a website named “Religious Tolerance” which, in a page titled “Anti-Judaism: 70 to 1200 CE”, lists a series of anti-Jewish pronouncements by early Christian writers such as Saint John Chrysostom, Saint Hilary of Poitiers, Saint Augustine and Saint Jerome. Now, there is no question that these men, and many others beside, did make statements which nowadays would be regarded as straightforwardly anti-Semitic, in a religious sense. Yet these are theological opinions of individuals, not imperial policy. Furthermore, it should be stressed that John Chrysostom’s attack, which he launched when he was a priest in Antioch (386), was designed to put an end to the practice among Christians of going to synagogues and participating in their services. As Robert Spencer rightly notes, “the fact that Christian attendance in synagogues was widespread in late fourth-century Antioch indicates that neither anti-Semitism nor anti-Judaism were dominant among Christians at the time, many of whom understood that there was a bond between Christianity and Judaism.” (Religion of Peace? p. 113) We note too that what John Chrysostom and the rest said about the Jews was mild in comparison with the attacks they made against heretics such as Manicheans and Donatists; and Jewish writers of the time were equally vociferous in their condemnation of Christians; and whilst Christians had suffered death – often on a large scale – simply for being Christian, Jews had not.
In view of the fraught history of relationships between Jews and Christians, it is remarkable that, when the Empire became Christian, there was little or no retaliation against the Jews. It is true that several Emperors, most notably Justinian, did pass anti-Jewish edicts. None of these however were severe, and rarely went beyond restrictions placed on the building of new synagogues and (in the case of Justinian) refusing to allow the Jews to celebrate Passover before the Christian Easter. Hardly draconian! And it needs to be stated that even these measures were elicited more by political than religious considerations. Since the time of the pagan Emperors, the Jews of Palestine and the eastern Mediterranean had consistently sided with the Persians in their perennial wars with the Romans. It happened again during the time of Justinian, and he reciprocated with these legal measures. (See Cyril Mango, Byzantium: the Empire of New Rome, p. 92). And it should be noted that even Justinian, regarded as the most intolerant of the Christian Emperors, had numerous Jewish friends and advisors.
Proof that the Jews experienced no real persecution from the early Christians is seen in the great increase in the numbers and the prosperity of the Jewish people in the centuries that preceded the First Crusade. By the eleventh century both France and Germany were home to large and prosperous Jewish communities. Steven Runciman notes that, “Jewish colonies had been established for centuries past along the trade routes of western Europe.” (The History of the Crusades, Vol. 1, p. 134) These colonies “kept up connections with their co-religionists in Byzantium and in Arab lands, and were thus enabled to play a large part in international trade, more especially the trade between Moslem and Christian countries.” Runciman notes that the Jews “had never undergone serious persecution in the West. … The kings of France and Germany had always befriended them; and they were shown particular favor by the archbishops of the great cities of the Rhineland.”
But if there was no prior persecution of the Jews, whence, we might ask, did this hatred arise?
Europe’s largest Jewish community was located in Spain. Following the Islamic conquest of that land in 711, the Jews came under the domination of a faith that, unlike Christianity, was from its inception virulently and violently anti-Jewish. For Muslims the lead was given by none other than their founder, the Prophet Muhammad. It would be superfluous to enumerate the anti-Jewish pronouncements in the Koran and the Haditha, where the Hebrews are portrayed as the craftiest, most persistent and most implacable enemies of Allah. In the Koran (2: 63-66) Allah transforms some Jews who profaned the Sabbath into apes: “Be as apes despicable!” In Koran 5: 59-60, He directs Muhammad to remind the “People of the Book” about “those who incurred the curse of Allah and His wrath, those whom some He transformed into apes and swine, those who worshipped evil.” Again, in 7: 166, we hear of the Sabbath-breaking Jews that “when in their insolence they transgressed (all) prohibitions,” Allah said to them, “Be ye apes, despised and rejected.”
From the same sources we know that Muhammad’s first violent action against the Jews involved the Qaynuqa tribe, who dwelt at Medina, under the protection of the city. Muhammad “seized the occasion of an accidental tumult,” and ordered the Qaynuqa (or Kainoka) to embrace his religion or fight. In the words of Gibbon, “The unequal conflict was terminated in fifteen days; and it was with extreme reluctance that Mahomet yielded to the importunity of his allies and consented to spare the lives of the captives.” (Decline and Fall, Chapter 50) In later attacks on the Jews, the Hebrew captives were not so fortunate.
The most notorious of all Muhammad’s attacks against the Jews was directed at the Banu Quraiza tribe. This community, which dwelt near Medina, was attacked without warning by the Prophet and his men, and, after its defeat, all the males over the age of puberty were beheaded. Some Islamic authorities claim that Muhammad personally participated in the executions. The doomed men and boys, whose numbers are estimated at anything between 500 and 900, were ordered to dig the trench which was to be their communal grave. All of the women and children were enslaved, with Muhammad personally taking for himself one of the most beautiful of the prisoners. He also confiscated the property of the murdered Jews. These deeds are mentioned in the Koran as acts carried out by Allah himself and fully sanctioned by divine approval. Thus in Koran 33:26-27, we read:

And he brought those of the People of the Book [Jewish people of Banu Qurayza] who supported them from their fortresses and cast terror into their hearts, some of them you slew (beheaded) and some you took prisoners (captive). And he made you heirs of their lands, their houses, and their goods, and of a land which ye had not frequented (before). And Allah has power over all things.

The killing of the Jewish prisoners is sanctioned in Koran 8:67:

It is not fitting for an Apostle that he should have prisoners of war until He thoroughly subdued the land…
The Massacre of Banu Quraiza was followed soon after by the attack on the Khaybar tribe. On this occasion, the Prophet ordered the torture of a Jewish chieftain to extract information about where he had hidden his treasures. When the treasure was uncovered, the chieftain was beheaded. This chieftain was the husband of the most beautiful Jewish woman of Khaybar, the 17-year-old Safiyah. Safiyah’s family members had been annihilated by Muhammad at the Banu Qurayza massacre. Now having beheaded her husband, the Prophet took Safiyah as his slave. The story is told thus by Sahih al-Bukhari, whose compilation of the acts and deeds attributed to Muhammad was written in the ninth century, and forms one of the two pillars of Islamic jurisprudence. (Volume 5, Book 59, Number 512):
The Prophet offered the Fajr Prayer near Khaybar when it was still dark and then said, “Allahu-Akbar! Khaybar is destroyed, for whenever we approach a (hostile) nation (to fight), then evil will be the morning for those who have been warned.” Then the inhabitants of Khaybar came out running on the roads. The Prophet had their warriors killed, their offspring and woman taken as captives. Safiya was amongst the captives, She first came in the share of Dahya Alkali but later on she belonged to the Prophet. The Prophet made her manumission as her ‘Mahr’. Muhammad was sixty (60) when he married Safiyyahh, a young girl of seventeen. She became his eighth wife.

The distribution of the booty is described thus in al-Bukhari Hadiths No.143, page-700:

Sulaiman Ibne Harb…Aannas Ibne Malek (ra) narrated, “in the war of Khayber after the inhabitants of Banu Nadir were surrendered, Allah’s apostle killed all the able/adult men, and he (prophet) took all women and children as captives (Ghani mateer maal).. Among the captives Safiyya Bint Huyy Akhtab was taken by Allah’s Apostle as booty whom He married after freeing her and her freedom was her Mahr.”

It is said that at first Dihyah al-Kalbi, one of Muhammad’s followers, asked for Safiyah. But when Muhammad saw her exquisite beauty, he chose her for himself and gave her two cousins to Dihyah.
In the massacre of the Jewish Settlement of Bani Mustaliq, Muhammad captured their women and took twenty-year-old Jewish girl, Juwairiya as his personal slave. [Al-Bukhari 3.46.13.717, p431-432]. Sahih Muslim (2.2349, p.520) says that Mohammed attacked the Banu Mustaliq tribe without any warning while they were heedlessly grazing their cattle. Juwairiya was a daughter of the chief. Sahih Muslim 3.4292, p.942 and Abu Dawud 2.227, p728 and al-Tabari 39, p.182-183 also say Juwairiya was captured in a raid on the Banu Mustaliq tribe. She had been married to Musafi’ bin Safwan, who was killed in battle.
We need go no further into the horrific details of these events, as they have already been examined by numerous writers and their veracity denied by no one. What we need to emphasize is the attitude these atrocities betray, as well as the fact that they became the model for the behavior of all future followers of The Prophet.
What caused Muhammad’s seemingly implacable hatred of the Jews? According to Gibbon, it was their refusal to recognize him as their long-awaited Messiah that “converted his friendship into an implacable hatred, with which he pursued that unfortunate people to the last moment of his life; and, in the double character of apostle and conqueror, his persecution was extended into both worlds.” (Decline and Fall, Ch. 50)
As noted above, it is a widely-held fiction that, aside from the Prophet’s persecution of the Jews of Arabia, Muslims in general and Islam as a rule was historically tolerant to this People of the Book, who were generally granted dhimmi (“protected”) status in the Islamic Umma, or community. But dhimmi status, also accorded to Christians, did not, as Bat Ye’or has demonstrated at great length, imply equal rights with Muslims. On the contrary, dhimmis were subject, even at the best of times, to a whole series of discriminatory laws and to relentless exploitation. At the worst of times, they could be slaughtered in the streets without any hope of legal redress. One of the most noxious measures directed against them was the requirement to wear an item or color of clothing by which they could be easily identified: identified for easy exploitation and abuse. The latter law was copied, significantly enough, by the Nazis. Bat Ye’or has shown that this law was enforced in Islam right from the beginning. The violence was not continuous, but the exploitation was, and the pattern of abuse initiated by Muhammad in Arabia in the seventh century was to be repeated throughout history. The first massacres of Jews in Europe, carried out by Muslim mobs in Spain, were preceded by other massacres carried out in North Africa, and clearly formed a continuum with Muhammad’s massacres of that people in Arabia.
Nonetheless, there was, at times, a semblance of tolerance for both Jews and Christians. It could not have been otherwise. When the Arabs conquered the vast territories of Mesopotamia, Syria, and North Africa during the seventh century, they found themselves a small minority ruling over enormous populations comprising mainly Christians and, to a lesser degree, Jews. As such, they needed to proceed with caution. Like all conquerors, the Arabs were quick to exploit any internal conflicts; and it was in their interests, above all, to divide the Christians from the Jews. This was particularly the case in Spain, where the Jewish population was very large. A united Jewish and Christian front could have proved extremely dangerous, and it was entirely in the interest of the conquerors to sow mistrust and suspicion between these communities. In the words of Bat Ye’or, “The [Arab] invaders knew how to take advantage of the dissensions between local groups in order to impose their own authority, favoring first one and then another, with the intention of weakening and ruining them all through a policy of ‘divide and rule.’” (The Dhimmi, p. 87)
Now, Jewish communities, both in Spain and elsewhere, tended to be both educated and prosperous. Jewish doctors, scientists and merchants could be usefully employed by any ruling group. And employed they were by the Arabs. Some, such as Ibn Naghrela, rose to positions of great prominence, whilst the international connections of the Jews and their mastery of languages proved invaluable to the new rulers. The Jews frequently found themselves in the role of intermediaries between Muslims and Christians. And we cannot pass over the role of Jewish merchants in supplying Muslim Spain with all its essentials – including slaves from northern and north-eastern Europe. (See eg. Hugh Trevor-Roper, The Rise of Christian Europe, p. 143)
Yet such favors as the Jews enjoyed was transitory and uncertain. There was never any real security, as the massacres of 1011 and 1066 illustrate only too well. On the other hand, it was entirely in the interests of the Muslims that the Christians believed the Jews were favored. And part of that myth was the notion that “the Jews” had actually assisted the Muslims in their conquest of the country.
The likelihood that this story was true is vanishingly small, especially when we consider the massacres of Jews carried out in Arabia by Muhammad himself just a few decades earlier. No people had better international links than the Jews, a nation of merchants par excellence, and those of Spain would have been very much aware of Muhammad’s behavior long before the first Muslim armies landed on Spanish soil. Nonetheless, the story got out that the Jews had helped the Muslims. There can be little doubt that this story was fostered by the Muslims themselves, as part of the policy of divide and conquer; of sowing mistrust between the two vanquished communities.
Now, all during the tenth and eleventh centuries, the war for possession of the Iberian Peninsula raged between Christians and Muslims. This conflict was to grow into a real clash of civilizations, as Christians and Muslims called in the assistance of co-religionists from far and wide. The Shrine of Santiago de Compostela became a rallying symbol for the Christians of the north and for those of France and Germany, who crossed the Pyrenees to join the struggle against Islam. Their Christian allies in Spain already had the conviction that the Jews were secret allies of the Muslims – a belief, as we said, encouraged by the Muslims themselves. They were convinced that the Jews had assisted the Muslims in their conquest of the country; and they came into contact with Muslim anti-Semitic attitudes – attitudes which the Christians began to imbibe. This latter point needs to be emphasized, because it has never I feel been given the weight it deserves. As the dominant power of the time, Islam was hugely influential. Christian kings, both in Spain and southern Italy, began to adopt Islamic ideas and norms on a whole range of things. Some began to keep harems, attended by eunuchs; others became enthusiastic slave-traders; and all began to see the Jews as somehow enemies of God – a treacherous people who might poison wells and murder Gentile children.
Now, it is an acknowledged fact that it was in Spain that the warriors who later joined the First Crusade learnt to dislike the Jews. In Runciman’s words, “Already in the Spanish wars there had been some inclination on the part of Christian armies to maltreat the Jews.” (The History of the Crusades, p. 135) Runciman notes that at the time of the expedition to Barbastro, in the mid-eleventh century, Pope Alexander II had written to the bishops of Spain to remind them that there was all the difference in the world between Muslims and Jews. The former were irreconcilable enemies of the Christians, but the latter were ready to work for them. However, in Spain “the Jews had enjoyed such favour from the hands of the Moslems that the Christian conquerors could not bring themselves to trust them.” (The History of the Crusades, p. 135) This lack of trust is confirmed by more than one document of the period, several of which are listed by Runciman.
Just over a decade after the Christian knights of France and Germany had helped their co-religionists in Spain to retake the city of Toledo from the Muslims, some of them prepared to set out on the First (official) Crusade. Before they did so, a few of them took part in the mass murder of several thousand Jews in Germany and Bohemia – an atrocity unprecedented in European history.
In view of the fact that these pogroms were committed by warriors some of whom had learned their trade in Spain, and in view of the fact that such atrocities were hitherto unknown in Europe, we may state that there is strong circumstantial evidence to suggest that the Christians had been influenced by the Muslims. This is all the more probable in view of Islam’s history of virulent and violent anti-Semitism. And if the Europeans were influenced in this by the Muslims, this was by no means the only novelty learned by them from their Muslim foes. The very idea of “Holy War”, previously unthinkable in Christian terms, now became an accepted principle of Church teaching; as did the notion that apostates and heretics should be violently suppressed. The latter doctrine, present in Islam from the very beginning, only became part of Church dogma with the launch of the Inquisition near the end of the twelfth century.

In my newly-published, Holy Warriors: Islam and the Demise of Classical Civilization, I argue at length that all of things commonly regarded as “Medieval” were in fact introduced to Europe from Islam, and that it was Islam, and not the Huns, Vandals and Goths, which terminated Classical Civilization, the rational and humane civilization of Greece and Rome, a civilization which had become synonymous with Christianity during the fourth century. This civilization survived in Europe and in North Africa and the Near East until the seventh century, at which point it was terminated by the Muslim conquests.

Holy Warriors: Islam and the Demise of Classical Civilization, is published by Felibri Publications. For information, see:
http://felibri.com/shop/index.php?main_page=product_info&cPath=84&produc...

you people are just a bunch of basterds that do not know anything about Islam and just spreading wrong information about islam. But you people can never be successful in your mission as Allah has promised to save Islam and his prophets name. So it means you are trying to compete with allah.
Lets see what you can do with these cheap actions.

kohn khan,

Scared are we?

The allah you worship is the DEVIL.

No God would prescribe / allow / promote the abhorent treatment of his own creations.

What Peaceful "God" would sanction the stoning of women?

What Peaceful "God" would encourage his so called prophet, a 52 yr old man, to have sex with a nine yr old girl?

What Peaceful "God" would create a religion so destructive that it is currently engaged in conflict with every other major religion?

Still, should you wish to protect your cult, why don't you take Mr Sina's challenge?

Could you please embed my vid to your website.

Thanks.

watch?v=6fAuolG3ji8

Above is a vid I made for Muslimahs claiming the hijab and niqab liberates them. I made a vid educating on the "real" Women's Liberation Movement and compared it to what these muslimahs represent, which they are hijacking a term coined by my mothers generation and do not stand for the real liberated woman's cause.

Could you please embed my vid to your site.

Thanks.

watch?v=6fAuolG3ji8

Above is a vid I made for Muslimahs claiming the hijab and niqab liberates them. I made a vid educating on the "real" Women's Liberation Movement and compared it to what these muslimahs represent, which they are hijacking a term coined by my mothers generation and do not stand for the real liberated woman's cause.

Thanks.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6fAuolG3ji8

Sorry, I left off the entire web address.

Above is a vid I made for Muslimahs claiming the hijab and niqab liberates them. I made a vid educating on the "real" Women's Liberation Movement and compared it to what these muslimahs represent, which they are hijacking a term coined by my mothers generation and do not stand for the real liberated woman's cause.

Respected dawood abraham,anis and chota sakeel "Hai Friend"kindly response as soon as possibe
Ref;Hon'ble persident of 261 motherly earth nation like barack H obama,vladimir outtin ,jaseq chiraq,asif ali jardari,Hammid karjai,ho jintao and respected director/persident of pentagon that can even drop atom bomb,Nato,CIA,FBi,KGB,Mossad,Almukhbirat,Mukhbirat,Boss,Swat,Pak Ib,ISI,JIo,SB,Swat,and other world intelligence agency,inerpolice,scotland yard,MI-5,MI-6 and others
"wishing you splendid joy and success throughout your life"sidharth shanker China for sidharth shanker PatnaBihar india"Tunna"

Subhan allah!
Respected dawood Abraham ,Anis abraham hai friend
"wishing you splendid joy and success throughout your life "
DG CISF NR das,Rahul gandhi,Pratibha devi singh Patil is anti Respected Islamic community and completely aginst "D-Company"and completely propagating method to eliminate you and brother Anis and they are aginst you required complete eliminationwith their family to protect you Your dawood companyand anis early action is highly required for your existance
Yours only friend sidharth shanker china for sidharth shanker PatnaBihar india"Tunna"

* IMAGE0004.JPGIMAGE0004.JPG
* IMAGE0005.JPGIMAGE0005.JPG
* IMAGE0006.JPGIMAGE0006.JPG
* IMAGE0007.JPGIMAGE0007.JPG
* IMAGE0008.JPGIMAGE0008.JPG
* IMAGE0009.JPGIMAGE0009.JPG
* IMAGE0010.JPGIMAGE0010.JPG
* IMAGE0011.JPGIMAGE0011.JPG

(TO GOD BE THE GLORY)
Dear beloved Brothers and sister in our lord
Grace and peace to you your blessed family your friends associates staff your well wishers colleges,your High ministries and all in the most precious name of our lord.
I am extremely happy to introduce myself as a pastor ministering 4 congregations in midst of agency area and rural areas people .By the grace of God I entrenched an orphanage and widow home.My ministry has been registered under the banner of 'GRACE WELFARE SOCIETY' by the state government .our ministry has been established in the year 2008.Besides being devotional activities we have also been running social service activities.our voluntary donations are not quite enough sufficient to lead all the activities.we can able to lead all the activities with meager offings from our poor staunch believers.our congregations are at a radius of 15 to 25 km. We can able to reach the congregations on foot.I have some co-pastors who are assisting me in spreading the good tiding to convert many souls into Christianity. In our country the demon worship of Hinduism spread all over the country.The Hindu Idol miscreants often forced to come to our churches and make hindrances not to spread of the gospel of Christ.In most of the states The orthodox Hindu religious leaders demolished churches and create violence.our prime aim is to prevent from spreading Hinduism.we want to see our country as a christian country.This is our future vision to establish kingdom of God on earth.As we are minors the orthodox religious leaders look down upon us and treat us as untouchables.we ask and pray God to open their blind eyes to discern the true plan of salvation.

Dear beloved Brother and sisters During natural catastrophe,we often visit flood victims, cyclone victims and rendered homeless people and provide blankets,used clothes and commodities to those who are victimized.During the time of Tsunami, our gospel team visited the Tsunami affected areas and extended our valuable services to exalt our lord .This is also one of the part of our gospel mission.
Dear beloved Brothers and sisters I crave your indulgence.please understand our precarious situation and extend your merciful hand of help in order to serve God in spirit and in truth.In spite of facing immense hardships we have been striving hard to win the lots.some times we can organize gospel campaigns to to spread of the gospel to the unreached .we have also been conduction pastoral conferences,Bible seminars,Night meetings ,Thanks giving meetings ,Bibles class and revival meetings for the glory of our lord.our lord has given us an wonderful opportunity to make use as a precious metal to shine for Him.please encourage us more to accomplish our future vision .I enclose here with all our gospel and compassionate activities for your prayerful considerations.please also share our photo work with your congregations ,family and friends, please put all the burden of gospel work activities and compassionate activities before your council of prayers and members and take your fruitful decision to glorify Him forever and ever.please also pray God to prevail peace on earth. we are fully committed to teach the good tiding until last breath of life.
Please continue to pray for our lord's vital services ,orphans, widows and out reach services

Here we are all fervently praying for you ,your blessed family ,your friends, associates,your staff ,your well wishers congregations and healthy of life

May our lord guide you ,keep you and strengthen you in every walk of life
May the spirit of God be with us

we wait for your prayerful reply at the earliest

May God bless your all
your humble and poor pastor in our lord
(PASTOR .K.VIJAYA RATNAM Sr)
My physical Address:
PASTOR.K.VIJAYA RATNAM
RANGAMPETA( PO&MDL)
E.G.DT., A.P.
S.INDIA-533 291

Only Evangelical Christians are demons to people in India.Read http://hildaraja.wordpress.com.For the general peace loving Christian's point of view.

whether or not this gets posted to your website, it is a dual message, first, a caution on slander and libel & second, the nature of all religions is to both reassure and control — to reassure people over the fears of death, and create stories about life afterward, which begins somewhere in the paleolithic ... on the other hand, rituals and superstitions permeate all human cultures from the beginning of homo sapiens. Use of such human fears & superstitions as factors of both self-induced subconscious control & externalized social constraints on individual or group opposition to whatever power elite controls any given space-time state formation.

Monotheism is a rather problematic construct, most developed within the Judeo-Hebraic tribal sects, then transmitted into both Christianity & Islam, which are thus Jewish heresies But even the moral code of Confucian systems involve social control and hierarchies of power.

In short, humans have created our various systems of belief and ritual, all of which have dual codes, social control on one hand and individual spiritual sustenance on the other hand.

Do we need religion? Psychological studies tend to show that we are weak minded and gutless in our fears of being outside of conventions, thus either pay lip service to, or quietly ignore religions as outright opposition or criticism would be personally dangerous, since all true believers of whatever cult, whether monotheistic or atheist, can be quite fanaticl in defending their beliefs and avoiding critical analysis.

However irrational all religions, they meet some inner human need thus set of cycles of reproduction whereby certain dynamic beliefs and rituals, however much they are capable of change, are transmitted across generations and peoples exterior to the ethno-cultural codes within which the religious systems have been constructed, maintained and reproduced.

it is a waste of time to isolate Islam and tilt at its wlndmills. If you do so want to attack any elements within that system, it would be far better to do so comparatively to show the interwoven beliefs and rituals that effect control over social practices and identity.

Dear All,

Islam is The Best

Remnants of Slavery for Hindus in India
Muslims are unable to tolerate, even the semblance of an alternative object of worship as Muhammad in Mecca destroyed all 360 idols that adorn in Kabba and the black cuboids that is still the centre piece of half. The destruction of the Shiva temple at Somnath on the west coast in 1030 AD to get treasure from the place of their worship and perishing 50,000 people waiting for miracle hidden in their trust of worship , which never happed. The part of the idol from Somnath lies before the door of the mosque of Ghazni, on which people rub their feet to clean them from dust, dirt and wet. After the defeat of Prathvi Raj Chauhan in repeated attacks by Muhammad Gauri for 16 times, and being spared his life by great fighter, after his victory on our motherland by Muhammad Gauri ,he ordered his slave general Qurbuddin Aibek to destroy magnificence triple temple complex built by the ancestor of Prathvi Raj Chauhan to convert it as mosque within the shed of two and half day and thus 70 pillars with 56 feet in height were defaced and disfigured according to Islamic tradition against Idol worship. Lordship for many is no good thing, to which the son of devious devising crones gives the scepter and right of judgment to watch over people and as such there must be only one ruler of retaliation and slaughtering over these agents of death, before they may again plunder us.
Muslims threatened to be prepared to stake their lives for achievement of Pakistan on Tuesday, 9th April 1946. Thus in a pre planned conspiracy , on 16th August 1946, a procession proceeded towards north towards Cornwallis street past Gray Street Crossing and on the same day , a mammoth meeting was held in maidan ( open Field). They started attacking the Hindus establishment chowinghee. In Pollock street area , Hindus Shops were looted and Children were murdered. The corpus left lying on the streets. Similarly in Canning Street Area, Hindus Shops looted and they were murder and their bodies multicoated were lying on the streets. Hindustan’s single biggest obsession has been its minority, which is an euphemism for Muslims the Rule in Bihar and In U.P. through this JATI RAJ flourished the Yadav- Muslims Solidarity and in absence of their monopolies and lesser popularity to the genuine representatives representing to such communities, this has become a paradise in the hand of these agents of the crusaders of death, sex and Crime. The enactment of violent orgies of Chengez Khan and Halaqu Khan, there will be the subsequent ethnic cleansing of majority of the Hindus, as was done by Aurangzeb after getting his previous generation enjoying with the status of having hundreds of wife, Concubines, slave Girls in their harem. Congress preferred bloodshed to the peaceful settlement for the exchange of the population in partition of our Sub Continent. It was the irony of the oppression that When M. Mujeeb, V.C. of Jamia Millia Islamic visited U. N. General Assembly , the representative from turkey asked that how does the Muslims were allowed to stay in India. The division of the subcontinent and Muslim cleansing agenda of Majority Hindus from their home land have been allowed by Gandhi- Nehru Nexus after independence.
After the partition of our sub continent on two nation theoretical doctrinaire, our leaders have not taken any step towards culturally integrated society instilling a sense of pride belonging in the inhabitants Hindus in independent India belonging to the great cultural heritage based upon the indigenous scientific research of our invention much beyond the imaginations of present scientists, but all hopes gone into oblivion and have suffered from the lapse of memory of our onslaught by the agent of dark and death. The slave could be freed by his master and unbeliever could become believer, but the fate of the woman was doomed for ever to remain what she, who has not left any calamity more determined to mankind to them woman, as bad omen is found in a woman, woman to be half of the person compared to a man.
A Jihadi Organisations to trap Hindu girls 'Love Jihad' - Pathanamthitta: Few days back a secular exposed shocking revelations about a jihadi organisation named 'Love Jihad' which has been conveniently ignored by rest of the media. Trapping naive Non Muslim girls (Read as Hindu girls) in the web of love inorder to convert to Islam is the modus operandi of the said organisation. Already more than 4000 girls have been converted to Islam by this Jihadi Romeos. Special branch of Police started investigation when marriages of such large scales are reported within last 6 months. As per the instructions to recruits of this organisation, they have to love a Hindu girl within the time frame of 2 weeks and brainwash them to get converted and marry within 6 months. Special instructions to breed atleast 4 kids have also been given. If the target won't get trapped within first 2 weeks, they are instructed to leave them and move on to another girl. College students and working girls should be the prime target. Once completed their mission the organisation will give 1 lakh Rupees and Financial help for the youth to start business. Free Mobile Phone, Bikes and Fashionable dresses are offered to them as tools for the mission. Money for this Love Jihad comes from Middle East. Each district have their own zone chairman's to oversee the mission. Prior to College admission they make a list of Hindu girls and their details and target those whom they feel vulnerable and easy to be brainwashed. It's upto our Secular parents and Hindu Soceity as a whole to decide whether they should inculcate the ethos of Sanathana Dharma upon their Sons and Daughters before getting targeted by these evil doers. The story of a Marxist MLA's daughter which hit even National Headlines (Although for Maligning Hindu Organizations is only the tip of the iceberg.
Islamic scholars require a deep understanding of the sources, principles and methods of reasoning of Islamic jurisprudence. Madrasas must give greater stress to these than at present. Unfortunately, only two or three books on the principles of Islamic jurisprudence are included in the present madrasa syllabus. And even these have their limitations, being, for the most part, limited just to the Quran as a source of jurisprudence, and not dealing with other sources of Islamic jurisprudence, such as the Sunnah or practice of the Prophet, ijma or the consensus of the scholars and qiyas or analogy. Several suitable books for these are available and they should be included in the curriculum. Furthermore, madrasa students should also be familiarized with texts on the principles of jurisprudence written by scholars belonging to schools of Islamic jurisprudence other than their own.
Likewise, the present madrasa curriculum does not do justice to such subjects as the principles of Hadith and the principles of Quranic commentary. In some madrasas, no books on these subjects are taught at all or else some small booklets are used, and that too in a very cursory manner. Further, it would not be wrong to say that madrasas have not given the Quran its due. Generally, in our madrasas only two Quranic commentaries are taught: the Tafsir-e Baidhawi and Jalalayn. The former is clearly insufficient for expressing the actual spirit of the Quran, and it only entangles the reader in verbal puzzles. Further, it does not deal with the entire Quran, being restricted just till the Surah al-Baqarah. As for the Jalalayn, it is like a rendering of the Quran in a different form of Arabic. So, this is all that is taught in the madrasas about the Quran, although there are numerous books dealing with the meaning of and commentaries on the Quran that can be incorporated in the curriculum. Madrasas give no importance at all to the teaching of history and to the books abut the life of the Prophet, although this was once a major area of specialization of the ulema. It is a subject that can never lose its relevance and importance. One of the reasons why much of the fiercely anti-Islamic propaganda coming out of the West has gone uncontested is because the ulema have ignored and are ignorant of the history of Islam, and so cannot counter the wrong allegations being made about it. Leave alone the history of non-Muslims or of recent global developments, about which they know almost nothing, madrasa students have an extremely superficial knowledge of even the early history of Islam and the Muslims. It is absolutely necessary that books on the history of Islam, of India and of the world be included in the madrasa curriculum. Today, subjects need to be studied in depth and from their original sources. Critics of Islam have established specialized Islamic research centres, and they have a deep knowledge of our history, our beliefs, our theology and our laws, which they use to seek to distort the image of Islam. Islamic scholars should also study other religions, and for this, certain books can be included in the madrasa curriculum that provide an introduction to the various religions, their basic beliefs, their social and economic principles and the lives of their leaders, drawing upon their original and reliable texts and sources. Further, madrasa students must also be made aware of modern social and economic systems and philosophies and theories. They must have at least a basic idea of the thought of such key modern thinkers as Karl Marx, Lenin, Freud, Darwin and so on. While studying Islamic jurisprudence, they must be familiarised with the position of modern international law on key issues in a comparative perspective. Without this, modern challenges cannot be effectively answered and met.
On 13 March 2002, an hitherto unknown and undistinguished gentleman named Harsh Mander made his debut in the columns of a national daily; became a well-choreographed international celebrity; resigned from the IAS after completing 20 years of service and becoming eligible for pension; and became `permanent' with an international NGO where he was on deputation. As the IAS is already under a cloud as a corrupt and non-performing organisation, this would be an ideal opportunity for it to take in-house correctives and stop pandering to the culture of "the anti-national is truly international." The nation is fast losing patience with these sleazy types. Briefly, Mander's execrable article was titled, "Cry, the Beloved Country. Reflections on the Gujarat massacre." It was obviously a command performance, and someone well-placed got it positioned in the English language media. Mander wrote claiming to have toured Gujarat for ten days after the riots, "My heart is sickened, my soul wearied, my shoulders aching with the burdens of guilt and shame." He spoke glibly of "pitiless brutality against women and small children by organised bands of armed young men," and YES: "What can you say about a woman eight months pregnant who begged to be spared. Her assailants instead slit open her stomach, pulled out her foetus and slaughtered it before her eyes." Well, we now know that this NEVER HAPPENED, so Mander must explain his information-gathering techniques or admit he simply wrote what he was tutored to write by unknown persons, or that someone did the writing which he passed off in his name because he had an IAS tag and was going to "resign" from service in a manner that would gain instant lucrative international assignment + pension benefit intact. In these circumstances, it would be a safe bet to conclude that the rest of his `true stories' are similar Bedtime Tales for the Macabre-Minded. This one is fit for Ramsay Brothers: - A small boy of six in Juhapara camp described how his mother and six brothers and sisters were battered to death before his eyes; he survived only because he fell unconscious, and was taken for dead. - A family escaping from Naroda-Patiya… spoke of losing a young woman and her three month old son, because a police constable directed her to `safety' and she found herself instead surrounded by a mob which doused her with kerosene and set her and her baby on fire. Looking back, I am amazed one did not detect, then, the note of joyous triumphalism, the gloating "I got you" tone in which the piece was written: "I have never known a riot which has used the sexual subjugation of women so widely as an instrument of violence in the recent mass barbarity in Gujarat . There are reports everywhere of gang-rape, of young girls and women, often in the presence of members of their families, followed by their murder by burning alive, or by bludgeoning with a hammer and in one case with a screw driver…"
Possible. But how does one explain the fact that nearly all surviving `raped' women now say that they never complained of rape, and did not know that their affidavits claimed rape? Everywhere he went, Mander met people who said Gujarat was not a riot, but a "planned massacre, a pogrom." Of course, he felt "great shame at the abdication of duty of my peers in the civil and police administration." And of course he blamed "civil society." In other words, the whole of Hindu India in whatever guise – politicians, police, officers, citizens. The only true Samaritans he did encounter were Muslims (who else?) What must be done? u Harsh Mander was a SERVING IAS officer when he wrote those outright lies. He must be prosecuted under relevant laws for
1] Scandalizing the Gujarat government in the eyes of the nation and the world 2] Peddling false stories about the torture of Muslim women with the intent to humiliate and dehumanize Gujarati Hindu society in the eyes of the nation and the world 3] Inciting and provoking animosity and hatred among Hindus and Muslims by fanning fires of hatred instead of allowing the return of normalcy and communal harmony u The Government of India must immediately revoke his pension and recover previous amounts paid by attaching his bank accounts or properties, if necessary. u The National Human Rights Commission has evolved into a national disgrace and should be wound up expeditiously. It serves no public purpose and panders only to an international audience, which is definitionally anti-Hindu. u On 23 November 2008, I was part of a citizen's initiative to the Commission, to demand an enquiry into allegations of illegal detention and torture of Sadhvi Pragya by the Mumbai ATS. No action has been reported to us in this matter till date, and I am quite confident that after one formal notice to the Maharashtra Home Secretary – duly reported in the media – there has been NO follow up action at all. u Since then, Sadhvi Pragya has been hospitalized for weakness after she refused food on finding non-vegetarian items in her jail food. Would NHRC have remembered that it had sent a formal notice to the Maharashtra Government and not got a reply? No. There seems to be a tacit understanding about what cases need to be followed and what are to be ignored. u Since the cases taken up are ONLY those pertaining to the Minorities, and we already have a Minorities Commission, the NHRC is truly redundant. u The Supreme Court must tell us if we need a Supreme Court? Because if the highest judicial institution of the country plays Second Fiddle to West-backed NGOs and activists with unknown agendas and sources of income, we may be better off institutionalizing a true jungle raj in which we Hindus have a better chance of surviving. u If the Supreme Court does its job properly, what need is there of a National Human Rights Commission? It is not the job of the Indian taxpayer to provide retired judges with paid sinecures. These two organisations should stop their jugalbandi and tell us which of them should survive, and which should be wound up.
u The Supreme Court must immediately initiate steps to undo its own previous prejudicial and punitive treatment of Zahira Shaikh and give the poor orphan a fair compensation so that she can begin to pick up the pieces of her shattered life. The Registrar-General and Joint Commissioner of Police who demonstrated bias against her must be punished. u All Gujarat witnesses currently being `held' by NGOs must be immediately taken away and put under the custody of the Gujarat State . u All victims must be given their sworn affidavits in a language they understand and asked if they stand by them or rebut the allegations therein. After that, action must be taken against those who got signatures through unfair means. u The apex court must retrieve its honour by sending the Gujarat riot cases BACK to Gujarat . u Action must be taken against ALL NGOs and activists who orchestrated the international opprobrium against the Gujarat state and the Hindu people of India . u Zahira has exposed major holes in the ethical roofing of statutory commissions that play to an international gallery, and the Hindu-baiting media-NGO nexus. Her demand for a probe into Teesta's post-Gujarat assets remains pertinent. u Finally, as the riot cases were transferred on faulty premises, norms must be laid down to prevent the hijacking of justice in future. There will be no generation of great men, until there are women, free women of free mothers. There every women deserves sentiments. Women should be honored and adorned with appraisal. The religious act of family where women are not honored becomes fruitless. The family enjoys perpetual propriety, where women are delighted. Therefore one should honour women as ‘ PUJYA DEVI’ and refrain from committing any atrocities upon them. Equality on the basis of sex and individuality of women has been recognized by the Indian Constitution. The number of laws has been enacted to improve the lot of women, but it has not been successful in changing the status of women. The women continue to be exploited, as they are dependent, socially, economically and psychologically upon men. Education, an important source of personality development and emancipation has failed to bring women at par with men. Marriage being the sole purpose of women’s life, education becomes only a means to attain that purpose. Women constitute one of the backward social groups is in the need of special protection. Tradition, religion and law have conspired to make women subordinate to men. The subordination of women is against the spirit of democracy, it is against equality and justice. The abolition of Sati and Lord Bentinck ( Bengal Sati Regulation, 1929) was no doubt the first legal measure for social reform. Legalization of widow’s remarriage, prohibition of child marriage and recognition of widow’s property rights were some of the other reforms made during British Rule. The Constitution of India, realizing the special need for ameliorative efforts to bring about equality between man and woman provided the special provision for women and children. The egalitarian thrust provided the right to an adequate means of livelihood. The special provision for maternity relief reveals the anxiety of implementation of social obligation. Muslim Women by and large constitute a neglected section of the society. There is now indisputable evidence of steady decline in the value of women in society. The following trends may be responsible in this context: - (1) excessive morality amongst women and female child. (2) glaring disparity between men and women in access to medical services (3) Persistent decline in sex ratio. (4) Illiteracy and unemployment of women. Dowry is a clear Affirmation of the fact that one’s gender determines one’s worth or significance. Since worth is distributed unequally amongst the sexes at birth, worth deficiency amongst females can be offset by material additives.

The Apex court observed that this provision is not only manifestly unreasonable and arbitrary, but contains the quality of unfairness and exhibits " naked despotism" and therefore violative of Article 14. What are the special steps required to meet the specific disabilities faced by women .Is there the need for special laws to meet the disabilities faced by women. Laws, as we know, are only regulatory and not curative and had this not been so. Nothing would have been easier for us and to make laws against all social evils and find the next morning that our society has become heaven. The eradication of an evil lies not so much in law as in the society itself. No society can exists, breathe and move without a base and this base is provided by norms and values.
There is the urgent necessity to restore dignity of womanhood and give it a place in the society consistent with the human values and ensure them fundamental right of equality. There must be the complete prohibition of polygamy. Frequent divorces by Muslims, after giving alluring to minor innocent Hindu girls, having conversion to them through false affidavits to their Muslims folds by scandalizing the judicial proceeding against every legal and permissible norms of the society, disturb the even fabric of Hindu society. A Muslim having more than one spouse will not be given permission to avail any benefit from the government in our nation in order to complete the sacrosanct mandate enumerated under Article 44 of our Constitution of India. Law of Arabia of eight to tenth centuries is abandoned by the government in order to protect our cultural heritage, where the womanhood is respected with honour and motherhood by the non violent Hindus In this Nation. All these guidelines is to be interpreted in the spirit of lethal logic of displacement in this political adventures world of shifting circumstances and treacherous possibility depends upon timing of the action, as one stake that succeeds at one moment will fail at another moment in our great nation due to the appeasement policy of ruling party.
Several Locality in old Ahmadabad, Kanpur , Allahabad, Firozabad , Muzzfernagar, Azamgarh , Deoband , Aligarh Agra are still known as Pakistan and from there Hindus have moved in independent India to the different far distance locality including at western Bank of River Sabarmati in Ahmadabad . Having squeezed out of their homes at Kalupur, not far away from central Station, none of them have never complained of their threatened, but on account of killing of animals in the frontline on their festivals, all vegetarians, being oppressed by the smell of Beef, Meet, and fishes cooked by their new neighbors, they migrated from their home by getting the token money of the prices to the extend of 1/3 to the actual cost of their property. This is every where, in every Muslims Populated Majority in the entire Uttar Pradesh. Muslims tried to concentrate in their favored locality as from there they may shield their crime, evade the liability of the payment of taxes, Electricity Bills and telephone Charges.
In 1887, Sir Sayyad Ahmed Khan had begun to stress that Hindus and Muslims constituted two separate nations in India on account of diversant studies in Islamic culture. There is no record that Hindu who ruined their own community requirements, ever talked against it. Few reformists movement like Brahmo Samaj in Bengal and Prarthana Samaj in Maharshtra have done a little, but the most powerful reformist efforts were made by Swami Dayanand Saraswati; founding father of Aryan Samaj, whose stress on Vedanta. Bankim chandra Chattopadhaya in 1872 wrote “VANDE MATATAM”, while Swami Vivekanand propagated the greatness of our faith to the westerners oversea. It was up to 1919, those who were never classed as Muslims or were the half Muslims as they followed Hindu traditions came to be classed as Muslims and Shari at, except for giving punishments to Muslims criminals came to be applied to them under Muslims Personal Law ( Shari at ) Application Act. This act promulgated by Jinnah insistent by the Britishers under the guise of Divide and Rule Policy was retreated further after Khalifat Movement of Mahatma Gandhi to become popular and provided the seal of certification by Maulana Jawaharlal Nehru after gaining independence through bloodshed of majority of Hindus and proven to be the first step against national integration after partition of our sub continent in two parts.
Gandhi’s language was mild but his feelings were strong. His physically being thrown out of rail compartment at Pietermarityburg in 1912 was perhaps unforgettable to him through out his life. Thus, in his struggle against imperial powers he tried to unite Hindus and Muslims and in this process his target was Sultan of Turkey being angelicised for Khalifa being the spiritual and temporal head of Islam . Thus, when Hindus and Muslims were to agitate, it was perceived that Britishers may lend a sympathic ear from which may ensure peace and harmony. This was the correct perceptions of Gandhian ideology. Since minority appeasement at sophisticated level with pseudo secularist media by the soft Hindutva crowd has given effect to rise over the suppressed community of slaves amongst Muslims, during the partitions, the same feeling of seeing their nation as Dar-ul-Islam, has led to the partition. The godless Dravidian parties have shriller atheistic rhetoric became louder to refer Ram as non-exist while Hanuman as monkey and Ganesha as elephant to hurt Hindu sentiments while protecting Virgin birth and divine revelition of Bible and Quran. Rushdie’s satanic verses has been banned in regional drive of Tamils. Dr. B.R. Ambedkar in this context in his writings and speeches that whatsoever may be the Gandhian ideology, his obsessed in belief that Hindu- Muslim unity is essential, has led out to sacrifice Hindu interest, Hindu honour and Hindu blood. It would be well if Mahatma Gandhi could visit Malabar in 1921 to see the ghastly horrors, which were created by his preachings of himself and Mohammad Ali and Shaukat Ali. Thousands of knives were secretly hidden and the rebellion broke out on August 20, when khilofat flags were hoisted on Police stations. Wilful murders of Hindus and arsons were begun on 29th Nov. 1921 at Chembrasscri Thangan. Thus, the truth is infinitely of more paramount importance during partition of India, then Hindu- Muslim unity. Young India of 29th Sept. 1921 quote, “ we have forgetten the divine out of dine for our faiths without relations………..The Hindus must have the courage and the faith to feel that they can protect their religion inspite of such fanatical eruptions. It is estimated that in the course of rebellion, 600 Hindus were killed and 2500 Hindus forcibly converted to Islam. Judge rebuke to the Muslims of Kohat, had observed that if Muslims kidnap a women and make her embrace Islam when she does not know the Kalama, how she can become a Muslim ? In such situation whether a Hindu will not beg in defending her or to take her back into Hindu fold which was opposed to the Gandhian philosophy. Abdul Rashid murdered on 23rd Dec. 1926 of Swami Shraddhanand when Swami recovered from pneumonia, the miscreants entered his home and killed him with a dagger. Rashid community collected funds to pay Asaf Ali, in whose memory the Asaf Ali marg is named in Delhi. He was sentenced to death, but his funeral procession was joined by 50,000 Muslims for earning merit for the soul of Abdul Rashid as the Allah may give him a place in Ala-e-illeeyeen ( seventh heaven) so is the feeling for Mohammad Afzal who made the parliament attack. The destruction of temple has been looked as crowning glory of Islam over idolatry. The idol broker will go to heaven. On Ist April, 1950, Dr. Shyama Prasad Mukherjee resigned and thereafter he made Bhartiya Jansangh Party as Nehru’s neglect of Bengalis has led to an agitation. The Bengalis Hindu were against Nehru apathy when criminal assaulted on their women, then Tiger of Bengal raised his hand and stepped forward. Maulana Azad was unmasked when he issued a Fatwa in favour of Hizrat. He said, “Muslim, who cannot migrate immediately to Pakistan should help the migrant (Muhajirin). Now the Christian Chief Minister in the State of Andhra Pradesh namely Shri Y. Samual Rajshekhar Reddy has got 34000 Hindu temples taken under his Government control, in which Tirupati Balaji temple is converting on ideological Christianity. Even the blessing to the pilgrimage authored in the shape of food articles is under the domain of a Christian. All the picture of goddess Venkatesh are replaced by pictures of Jesus Christ in Padmawati university, whose highest priest namely the Vice-Chancellor is a Christian namely Smt. Veena Mogal. Recently the Kerala Government run by a Christian has prohibited the entry of Hindu organisation known as Sanatanvahini created by Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj, which is the cause of resentment of Hindu Janjagrit Samiti at Varanasi . It is a matter of great conern that the central Govt. being run by a Christian lady namely Sania Manio of turin @ Sonia Gandhi wife of Late Sri Rajiv Roberto “Gandhi” has provided another rift between Hindu and Muslim by given effect to Sachchar Commission on the policy of reservation to the Muslims based upon the religion, which is prohibited in the basic structure of the constitution of India. Thus the extinguishing Hindu religion is perpetuating the expansion of Christianity. Such control has been excluded from Muslim monuments, which get the substantial income from the earning Hindu, Jain, Sikkh, Boudh and Parsi temples. Every one knows this fact that the butchers under the false protext of sacrifice on Bakar-id slaughter about 10 Millions goat, 5 millions Sheeps, 1 million cow and 50000 camels every year and thereby providing a threat to the ecology and environment. There has been the prohibition even for entering in side the masque to the Hindu while their income being donated upon the diety is flourished in the shape of the training provided in Madarsha to convert Dar-ul-herb as Dar-ul-e Islam. We should remember the past when Hindus were subjected to behave like a Jimmi and were required to pay the taxes of Jakat simply for carrying upon their traditions and rituals. The condition of Kashmiri Hindus who have become migrant to the adjoining place on account of terror created in Kashmir is not the thing of past where even to speech for the contribution of Mahatma Gandhi by Sri Gulam Navi Azad Chief Minister of J & K is providing the symbol of protest from the radical fundamentalists known as Las-k-re Tohiba and its protector in our nation.

The continuation of dynastic rule by Gandhi era has become consciously or unconsciously the foreign Rule. No one Single handedly may elect the representative of the voter to the electoral college. The concept of spirit inherently personal choice of the voter to get their representatives in electoral college has been completely vanished. Exercise of liberty vote is overburdened with !) to evaluate expression less action performance at the behest of the people in power2)to select the candidate as representatives from the limited choice imposed upon the voters by party system 3) to express their adult franchises like a illiterate voters amongst the limited choice between the rascals nominated by party as god fathers mainly on the basis of money power or by choosing an idiot, who may be ruled with remote control even on the post of President and Prime Minister 4) Criminals may be given free hand to take a political decision under the garb of appeasement 5) Nehru- Gandhi nexus which remain responsible for creation of Pakistan has again risen their heads to divide India , Pakistan and Bangla Desh in many Segmentations. This is virtually the Concept of Rule of majority vote. The country is being dismantled after more than a half century of nation building. On 26th January, 1950, Dr. Bhim Rao Ambedkar said that India will become Independent Country. India has been lost by it’s infidelity and treachery by some of our own people. The invasion of Sind by Invader Momd. Bin Kasim as the Military commanders of King Dahar accepted the Bribes and they refused to fight. It was Jai Chandra “Arjun”, who invited Mohammad Ghori to invade Sri Prithivi Raj Chauhan and promised help of himself and of the King Solanki. History has been repeated in case of Afzal again. Their will be another hijacking of Plane to get him release. The attackers on the Court premises are well protected by these traitors living in our country and killing the so called infidels under the banner of Jihad?. Our independence , after creation of Pakistan is again in jeopardize and probably we may loose it forever On 23rd Feb. 2000 , Sri K.R. Narayanan, President of India promulgated “ The National Commission to Review the Working of the Constitution by a message:- Right of vote under universal adult Franchise gives Right and opportunity to participate Every men in Democratic process and select a Govt. However we all know that the election system in India may not get the rid to the system of Corruption, Crimilisation , money, nepotism , favoritism and Muscle power. Home Minister of India accepts in 2002: - There are the defect in election system, but it is difficult to blame for it to the Government, it’s officers, and to the Political Parties. Sri Bimal Jalan said that Common Citizen is concerned about Administrative apathy, Corruption and failure to provide Promised benefit to the poor Farmers. India is ranking Highest in the Global corruption level of World. Here is dismal Ranking in Human Development. We may see poverty as the caste to the people is placed above for elimination of poverty, alleviation, hunger, Illiteracy and health. This problem is Systemic and never projected like Episodic to the people. We are losing control of our most important industries. As we give up domestic ownership of our assets, we lose the most exciting and challenging jobs, which too often move to the new corporate headquarters outside India- and young people who want those jobs must follow. It's part of the brain drain. In effect, India has become a victim of "Globalization". We are told this process is both inevitable and good. It is only inevitable if we let it happen. It is only good for twenty percent of the world's richest and most powerful people. It is bad for the vast majority. We need debate for participation of 1000 people for electoral college candidates in future election process to come forward and eliminate the monopoly of limited Choice for selecting the representatives by the voters. There must be the implementation of systematic Solution , even at the cost of absurdity and obsessive- ness in the defective system. We have to search the effect- cause and relationship in reformative trends. There may be some strategy to represent majority of farmers for making a proposal to provide them the cost of International Market. There may be tortuous liability and lesser faire policy of functioning be made accountable. Let criminals may know that Crime is a bad Bargain to them. The license Quota System be abolished and Religious activities be prohibited on public Premises as secularity of nation in Multifarious religious country be maintained.
Gandhi ji’s letter dated New Delhi 27/28th June 1947 to Lord Mountbatten. On the question of Partition, he made a significant observation: “You startled me again by telling me that, if the partition had not been made during British occupation, the Hindus being the major party would have never allowed partition and held the Muslims by force under subjection. I told you that this was a grave mistake. The question of numbers was wholly untenable in this connection. I cited the classic example of less than one hundred thousand British soldiers holding India under utter subjection. You saw no analogy between the two instances. I suggested the difference was only one of degree. I place the following for your consideration: “(a) The Congress has solemnly declared that it would not hold by force any Province within the Union. “(b) It is physically impossible for millions of caste ridden Hindus to hold well-knit though fewer millions of Muslims under subjection by force. “© It must not be forgotten that Muslim dynasties have progressively subjected India by exactly the same means as the English conquerors later did. “(d) Already there has been a movement to win over to the Muslim side the so-called scheduled classes and the so-called aboriginal races. “(e) The caste Hindus who are the bugbear are, it can be shown conclusively, a hopeless minority. Of these the armed Rajputs are not yet nationalists as a class. The Brahmins and the Banias are still untrained in the use of arms. Their supremacy where it exists is purely moral. The Sudras count, I am sorry, more as scheduled class than anthing else. That such Hindu society by reason of its mere superiority in numbers can crush millions of Muslims is an astounding myth.
It is impossible that Jawaharlal Nehru and other leaders of the Congress were unaware of t he factual position stated by Gandhi. What was then the raison de’tre for special minority rights to the Muslims and Christians in the Indian Constitution against an emasculated Hindu majority? Another, and more important, question is, if Gandhi knew Hindu weakness as he stated to Mountbatten, why did'nt he first try to remove Hindu weaknesss and strengthen the Hindu society in which he was born? Didn't he know that, in the event the British leave India, the more powerful Muslim community would forcibly snatch political power to itself and leave Hindus in a state of slavery as the latter had been in the medieval period? Gandhi’s secularism always aimed at destruction of Hindus at the hands of Muslims. Paswan’s secularism advocates a Muslim Chief-Minister in Bihar. Arjun’s secularism believes in distorting our history. Numerous such pseudo secularists have always been active to destroy the Hindus. Mulayam’s secularism impels him declare holiday in U.P. on last Friday of Ramjan. Mulayam, Pasvan and even Nitish Kumar throwing Iftaar parties to Muslims and wearing muslim caps on their heads shamelessly is the burning example of pseudo secularism.The irony is that their secularism erupts only when the interests of the non-Hindus are involved. Thousands of Hindus being murdered in Mopla and Naokhali riots before partition, lakhs of Hindus being butchered and crores suffering displacement during partition in 1947 did not make a dint on any of these secularists. Thousands of Hindus being slain in Punjab and Jammu & Kashmir and lakhs being rendered refugees in their own motherland did not shake the soul of the secularists. Conversion of Bangladesh from a secularist to an Islamic nation in 1979 did not perturb these secularists nor did the planned elimination of Hindus in Bangladesh and Pakistan caused qualms of conscience to them. The kar-sewaks burnt alive in Godhra doesn’t make any difference to these secularists, but its reaction in the form of Gujarat riots is termed as a “blot” on humanity. The exploitation of the lower castes at the hands of the privileged ones fomented hatred amongst the denizens of the country and weakened the Hindu race. Further, the Hindus being divided on caste lines in the past, the responsibility to fight and protect the country from foreign invaders was solely put on the Kshatriyas. This gave the others an excuse to shy away from the duty to sacrifice for the country. Whenever there was any attack, it was the Kshatriyas who were to face the brunt. Many a time their short number or non-availability of fighter-Kshatriyas lead to their defeat in wars.
Secularism (or pseudo-secularism?) has done immeasurable harm to Hinduism. The selfish Hindu leadership, both religious & political, is always eager to compromise the interest of Hindus for transient gains, in the name of secularism, without realizing the harm caused to the religion in the long run. Is this secularism not applicable to Muslims? Never does a Muslim ever talk of respect to the other faiths. The Muslim invaders exercised every atrocity to finish the Hindu race. They believed in dar-ul-Islam (converting the whole human race into Islamism). The only language they know is jehad and for them jehad denotes just killing qafirs i.e. everyone who does not follow Islam. The objective of dar-ul-Islam is very much alive even today. The whole world today is under the perpetual threat of Muslim fundamentalism.

Muslim invaders looted & demolished thousands of temples and erected mosques over them, but redeeming Ram Temple from underneath Babri mosque is the “blackest day”. It is a well known historical fact that the Muslim invaders exercised every atrocity on the native Hindus. They attacked us. They looted wealth, slaughtered innocent people, converted Hindus to Islam at the point of sword. They kidnapped our women and raped them with pride. They broke temples and erected mosques over them. They even decked idols of those temples in the stairs to humiliate Hindus. Famous historian P.N. Oak claims that the so called Muslim monuments in India were originally the Hindu buildings. The Muslim invaders plundered them, captured them, broke them, sacrileged them and converted them into Muslim monuments. The Hindus, instead of considering them a stigma on the national honour take pride in calling them national monuments. Millions of rupees are spent on their maintenance. Some have been given the status of heritage buildings. A community of self honour would never accept such humiliation like this. Time and again Commissions have been constituted to convict, by hook or crook, the accused of the 1984 Delhi riots and 2002 Gujarat riots even after their acquittal by the courts of law. On the other hand, terrorists like Wassan Singh Zaffarwal and Jagjit Singh Chouhan deserving severe punishment have gone scot-free for want of proof and it did not impel any secularist to deplore such acquittal and seek re-trial. Mushrooming madrasas in the country indulging in anti-India activities does not worry these secularists but they have the audacity to term the activities of RSS and VHP as anti-nation. For them, religion-based reservation for the Muslims in AMU is not an anti-national act, but the alleged discrimination in relief-distribution to the quake-hit in Bhuj surely perturbs these secularists. 5% reservation for Muslims in A.P. awaiting emulation by Bihar and many other State Governments is another burning example of their secularism. Pampering the Muslims at the cost of the Hindus is an unpardonable sin, which cannot be forgiven by any rational and nationalist Indian. It is nothing but a political gimmickry for appeasement of Muslims to garner their votes, which has rendered the Hindus orphans in their own land. The coming generations of ours are being recklessly thrown to a disadvantageous position. The virtual slavery is inevitable for us. Prophet Mohammed’s picture (cartoon) in a Danish newspaper attracted protest from Muslims all over the world. Conversely, you can amply see Hindu leaders neutralising efforts of their own brothers doing something for Hindu welfare and blaming of violating secularism. It is nothing but a cheap effort to earn momentary & transient acclaim from others. On the contrary, the leaders of other faiths fighting collective, forgetting their political differences, definitely fetches them tangible results. The above-mentioned points prove that the Hindus are dead race with impotent leaders. They are no better than sheep and goats. They take pride in being driven like cattle by others. The selfish Hindu leaders see nothing beyond their myopic ends. The meek & selfish Hindus are sure to extinct one day.
Exhortation for waging of Jihad, An instrument of securing a source of revenue for protecting and promoting Islam came to the light in British period by Mohammad Ali Jinnah who persuaded the legislative council in united India to pass the Wakf act of 1913. Wakf display that the temple turned Mosques are the evil fruit of plunder and loot and pro Masjid moves and are thus fraught with danger. It proved to be the savior of these obsolete and discriminatory institutions. The four British judges in their judgment in 19th late century described as the Wakf as the perpetuity of the worst and the most pernicious kind and as such wakf to be invalid and void. There is no Wakf in Turkey, Libya, Egypt, Sudan, Lebanon, Syria, Jordon and Iraq but it is still recognized by Indian Government. The final report of the Wakf inquiry committee was published in 1976 by Begum Indira Gandhi ( Mamoona after marriage with Firoj Khan S/O Nawab Khan of Junagarh having Grave near Anand Bhawan alias Firoj Gandhi and Mohammad Yunus ) Ministry of Law, Justice and company affairs describing that Sahajahan made Wakf in favour of Taj mahal and he himself became Multiwall of the said Wakf even after being imprisoned by his own son Aurangzeb just after the conversion of the Shiva Temple in the Majar of Anjuman Bano Jilani whose feet were tied up from a cord as she may not deliver her 14th child and was buried in Behrampur (M.P.) on 16th June 1629. How the Taj Mahal Started construction in 1633 as is being displayed by the Archeological Survey of India in their purported appeasement to the Muslim voters. Except the Quran scripts on the marble Eight Dimension Structure, Tridents,” OM” inscription, Kalash, Graves Plants, Lotus, Swastika and Scientific Carbon Dating of the Doors inside 6th Story Mahal having upper storey of Marvel Temple Constructed as TEJO-MAHALIA by JAT RULER Raja Paramini dev and Minister Shulkan ( There were 28 Sanskrit verses written with the gold having the prove of the temple of Lord Vishnu and Lord Shiva and authorship vested to than Jat Rulers still lying in Lucknow Museum) , there is no symbol for claiming and calling Taj Mahal as the Muslim Monuments.
As per Frederick Douglass, “The limits of tyrants are prescribed by the endurance of those whom they oppress.” India’s consistent policy of appeasement and of surrendering before its tormentors has resulted in genocide and eviction of Hindus from Kashmir.It is tragic that Kashmir, the land of Maharishi Kashyap, Lalitaditya, Kota Rani, Abhinavagupta and Kalhan; the cradle of Vedic heritage; and which was Hindu land with no Muslim presence, and which defeated Muslim invaders heroically for many centuries has been made a Hindu-less region.And to compound Hindu humiliation and disgrace, allotment of 40 hectares of forest land in May, 2008 to Shri Amarnath Shrine Board to provide temporary shelter for pilgrims visiting Amarnath shrine in Kashmir has been cancelled by the government on July 1, 2008 due to violent protests from Kashmiri Muslims who celebrated the cancellation as a “great victory”.Kashmiri leaders have opposed the allotment of land to Amarnath Shrine on the absurd ground that it is a conspiracy to reduce the Muslims to a minority in Kashmir. Stiff opposition to the said land allotment by Muslim majority Kashmir sends the perverse message that in secular India, Hindu-majority areas belong to everyone but Muslim-majority areas belong to Muslims only. Amarnath cave, the abode of Lord Shiva, is one of the oldest and most important Hindu pilgrimage centres. It is situated at an altitude of about 4000 metres in Kashmir. During 1980s and 1990s, Pakistan-sponsored terrorists killed thousands of Hindus in Kashmir, and drove out several lakhs of terrorized Hindus from Kashmir; and made Kashmir a Hindu-less region. Successive governments have done nothing to rehabilitate Hindus in Kashmir; and to punish their tormentors. Most of the Kashmiri Muslims treat J&K as an Islamic State in a ‘secular’ India, and treat Hindu pilgrims to Amarnath as tress passers. Kashmiri Muslims opposed this allotment of land since it was meant to provide shelters for Hindu pilgrims. The government capitulated before the violent protestors and revoked the allotment. This outrageous action shows pathetic plight of Hindus in their own country. Though ‘secularism’ implies separation of religion and State, and though a ‘secular’ State cannot reward or punish the people on the basis of their religious affiliation, ‘secularism’ practised in India means anti-Hinduism. With sub-zero temperatures, heavy rains and stormy weather during Amarnath pilgrimage, some basic facilities like shelters for the pilgrims on way to shrine are a must. The holy cave is accessible only during a short duration every year. Besides, many Amarnath pilgrims have been attacked and killed by terrorists in Kashmir. Fallacious pretensions advanced by Kashmiri leaders that the said lease of land would change the demography and “eco-cultural character” of the state are absurd. It is ludicrous to imagine that provision of temporary shelters to Amarnath pilgrims would reduce Muslims to a minority in Kashmir, or would destroy the environment. On the contrary, genocide and eviction of Hindus has made Kashmir a Hindu-less region. Opposition to allotment of land for Hindu pilgrims is described by Kashmiri leaders as ‘Kashmiri Nationalism’ thereby implying that Kashmir is meant only for Muslims. Most of Kashmiri leaders support pro-Pakistan demands like joint Indo-Pak control of Kashmir, demilitarisation of Jammu & Kashmir, legalizing Pakistani currency and open borders. Compare the Hindu pilgrim’s pathetic plight with the amenities provided by Central and State Governments to Indian Haj pilgrims. Indian government provides substantial subsidy to Muslims for Haj though even none of the 57 Muslim countries gives any such subsidy. Delhi airport has a separate Haj terminal. And there is a separate Haj cell in the ministry of external affairs. And many state governments have got Haj houses built on land provided by state governments. And Indian government ensures proper accommodation and safety of Indian Haj pilgrims in Saudi Arabia. Special teams of doctors, nurses and Haj officers are sent from India to Saudi Arabia to take proper care of Indian Haj pilgrims. In contrast, Hindus have been denied even temporary shelters to save them from heavy rain and snow when they visit their holy places in their own country. Shocking message from Kashmir deserves a deterrent and resolute response. Being a part of secular India, Kashmir cannot be just for Muslims. The blunders of retaining Article 370 in the constitution, and not punishing the criminals who killed thousands of Hindus and drove out lacs of Hindus from Kashmir, are responsible for the catastrophe called ‘Kashmiri Nationalism’. Daily Pak-Bangla terrorist and demographic invasion of India shows India’s pathetic plight. To save truncated India from demolition and dismemberment, Hindus have to discard their conceptual confusion and dream world; and become active and assertive. Deplorable situation must be redeemed at the earliest. Lacs of Kashmiri Hindus (who have been driven out of Kashmir) must be rehabilitated in Kashmir; and their homes, lands, properties and places of worship restored to them. Besides, since too much fraud has been perpetrated in the name of fake ‘secularism’, Article 370 must be deleted to enable Indians from the rest of India to settle in Kashmir the way Kashmiri Muslims are permitted to settle in the rest of India. After these measures are taken, no one will have the audacity to attack Hindu pilgrims or sabotage Hindu pilgrimages in Kashmir. Much of the injury Hindus are suffering is self-inflicted because of their capitulation before their tormentors. They must remember Shloka number 2.3 of Bhagvad Gita and fight for justice through all peaceful, constitutional and lawful means, “Klaibyam ma sama gamah Partha naitatava yupapadyate / Khshudram hrudaya dourbalyam tayaktvo uttishtha prantapa” (O Partha, do not yield to weakness. It is not worthy of you to yield to weakness. O scorchers of foes, shake off faint-heartedness, and get up).

It is interesting to find that the commonly agreed classification of atmospheric layers supports the Quranic information and it is beyond mere interest when we evaluate it together with all other scientific remarks in the Quran. Even if the reader does not find this classification persuasive, then he or she may subscribe to the alternative understanding that the figure seven expresses a plurality, without bringing any change in the miraculous significance of the verse. This double meaning of “seven layers” thus leaves no loopholes. Separating the atmosphere into harmonious layers is a modern discovery. The level of scientific knowledge at the time of the descent of the Quran did not permit making differentiation between the layers of atmosphere. Verse 12 of sura 41 reads: “So He ordained them seven heavens (skies) in two days (periods) and revealed in every heaven its affair...” making it clear that every layer served a different purpose, thanks to which life on earth was possible.
Abdul Rahman Antulay, Union Minister for Minority Affairs, who is an Islamic leader and Congress politician from Maharashtra, is one of the most important pro-Jihadi in the Sonia lead Congress government in New Delhi. Antulay is not merely the bridge between Sonia and Islamic mafia, but he is also the progenitor of the underworld Islamic mafia in Mumbai. Under his regime in Mumbai, the notorious Islamic mass murderer and mafia don Dawood Ibrahim was able to establish his criminal empire. Abdul Rahman Antulay made an erroneous and accusatory statement in Parliament that Hindu activists may be responsible for the murder of Maharashtra ATS Chief Hemant Karkare. His false accusation of innocent Hindus, the victims of Jihadi terrorism is utterly without merit. His diversionary tactic is a deliberate attempt to mentally misdirect the gullible public from the colossal failure of the Sonia government. The baseless allegation simply is attributed to save inept, corrupt and indifferent Congress ministers. Equally misleading is his malicious attempt to depict peace loving Hindus as the chief architects of the Jihadi massacre in Mumbai. Antulay is a point man for Sonia to hoodwink the public. His malicious statement is a psychological ploy to cover up the Congress government’s dereliction of responsibilities and misconduct in safe guarding life and liberty of citizens. Like an apocalyptic Islamic terrorist, Antulay is suffering from a peculiar malignant Islamic madness. His accusatory statement is, in fact, an attempt to avoid recognition of the darkness and Islamic hatred within him. The portrayal of Hindus as wild animals destroying lives is sheer Islamic Al-Taquiea. With this false diversionary ploy, the Antulay Islamic gang is systematically undermining India’s ability to defend itself against Islamic terrorists. Antulay’s Islamic political double game is nothing new. During his administration in Maharashtra, he encouraged pro-criminal Islamic values and endorsed Islamic smugglers, and Jihadi mafia gang in Mumbai.
Muslim in history of Bangladesh who openly advocated for the diplomatic relationship between Dhaka and Telaviv and opposed islamist terrorism exposing nexus between radical islamist political parties and terrorist groups Al-Queda and HUJI. His advocacy for Israel put him before danger and he was branded as an agent of Israel as Dr Richard Benkin his link between Israel and Bangla desh. He has been tortured by government agencies of Bangladesh on various occasions and two years back he was able to come out of jail only because of efforts of Dr Richard Benkin and some congress men in America. But sword is still hanging on his head which was visible when notorious armed force of Bangladesh RAB abducted him on gun point on March 18 2008 and insulted him in abusive language. It was again efforts of Dr Richard Benkin and some congress men in American congress which insured his safe release but his police protection has also been withdrawn in March. Government of Bangladesh has charged him with treason and sedition and if those charges proved he would be given death penalty. On 11th June when I received email form Salahuddin I got my eyes wet imaging the horrific anti climax of his struggle. Salahuddin Shoaib choudhary is not fighting for himself only his fight belong to all of us who are worried for the safe and free world as well as safe future for our next generation. What a paradox with South Asia on the one hand a terrorist who was responsible for attack on Indian parliament and who been executed to death penalty from lower court to Supreme court of India is pleading for clemency and due to Muslim appeasement Indian Government headed by Congress and Left are trying hard to delay the execution of Mohammad Afzal and on the other hand government of Bangladesh is trying hard to execute a moderate voice in Islam to appease Islamists in their own country. This contrast with similarity reflects the moral bankruptcy of South Asian countries and their submission to Islamist terrorism and Muslim appeasement. We have bitter experience of our neighbor countries with lack of democracy and respect for dissent voice. We have Pakistan and now Bangladesh which have fallen in the hands of Islamist forces and radical Islamist political parties in the grab of pseudo democracy not only protecting these forces but also nourishing them. In this critical phase if one moderate voice within Islamism has emerged we should protect and preserve it. Salahuddin is a victim of Islamism as we have earlier Salman Rushdie, Taslima Nasrin, Ayaan Hirsi Ali, Wafa Sultan and Ali Sina in this category. Salahuddin is a man who is ray of hope in this fight against Islamist terrorism and world can not afford to loose these kinds of warriors who are challenging the hegemony of Islamism within Islam. From last four issues of his weekly magazine he is writing a series of articles on Islamist terrorism with wide and deep information’s of base of Al-Queda and other terrorist networks in several parts of the world. For last few years Islamist terrorism has taken a new shift and south Asia has emerged as new hub of terrorism with Pakistan and Bangladesh as new gravity centre. Since 9\11 every major terrorist incident which happened across the world whether it is Europe or other parts of the world has role of Pakistan based terrorist groups as well as Bangladesh. Terrorism has grown to such proportion as it has gone out of hand and new strategy needed to tackle it properly. This new strategy is based on alliance against terrorism. This alliance could become reality once all terror affected civilizations and moderate voice among Islamic world come close together. In this new era of information it has become very easy to search our allies and be in touch with them. Dr Richard Benkin and Salahuddin are discovery of this new technology for me. Need of the hour is to rally behind Salahuddin in his critical phase to boost his morale. Salahuddin is not fighting only for his survival his success or defeat is going to decide our fate also as whether we would be able to preserve a moderate voice among Islam and pave the way for democratization of Islamic society in south Asia or not. We can defend him by our will power and academic efforts also. We should flood the embassy of Bangladesh in our country with petitions registering protest against immoral and autocratic stand of that country with predetermined trial of an innocent fighter against Islamism only to appease Islamist lobby.
The nude Painting of Bharat made by M.F. Hussain is an Art . The Majority of the Orignal Bhartiya’s , Those who had made the Symbol of Bharat Mata with beautiful inspiring cloths , feel shamed and hearted while looking the nude Bharat Mata Painting that is Mother of the whole World . And it is but natural . They even taken it as a great insult of Nation and her natives . Here one thing more is to be considerable that Arya-Khalsa- hindu people believe in making the Idols of their great personalities for the taking inspiration from them . But the Muslim’s of the world according to their Quran believe in Destroying the Idols and their followers with deep hate . After going through the Nation’s history we came to know that Muslims and their invader ancestors had destroyed 20,000 Temples with un-countable Idols and still they destroying them during riots . As their Mugal ancestors M.F.Hussain also following the orders of Quran is Insulting and Defaming the ditties of Hindus in the name of Art. Idol believers are called Mushirks in Quarn . Mushirks are worst type of creasers according to Quran .They are given only two alternatives either Islam or Death . According to T.P.Hughes Muslim Dictionary Mushirk means Idol believers . Today Muslims are also following it . For more information you can read the following Aayats of Quran Sura 2:Aayat 165, Sura9:Aayat 5,111, Sura29: Aayat 17, Sura 98: Aayat 1,6 , Sura 109: Aayat 1-6 . (read the translation of these Aayats from Quran Edition 1 November 2004 translated by Dr. Mohmd.Ahmed & Mohmd Faruq Khan published by M. S. S Abul Fazal Enclave Jamia-Nagar Delhi-25) The Chief Justices and so called secular leaders should know that the Malicious M.F.Hussain has not Painted nude Painting’s of the Bharat Mata but also Painted nude Paintings of Durga , Saraswati, Parvati , Sita , Ram and Hanuman ji only to Defame Hindu, Hindu-Dharam and Hindusthan . For more knowledge of judges and readers we want to disclose that this crooked M.F.Hussain has Painted a oil painting in which Hindu Scholar is shown nude but a Muslim fellow with beautiful dress . With these Historical Quranic evidences , It has proved that the nude Paintings made by Traitor M.F.Hussain is not the symbol of Art but the symbol of hate against Hindu-Dharam . If any artist thinks that the showing of nude Paintings of well dressed civilized personalities of a Nation is an Art would M.F.Hussain praises the nude Paintings of his own Mother,Wife and Sister made by any Arya-Khalsa- Hindu Artist ? Would he feel happy to see the nude Painting of Mohammed and his nine wives made by any Swiss Artist ? So this type of dirty Artist M.F.Hussain is a great Curse on the behalf of Aryavart that is Bharat . This type of dirty crasher should get severe Punishment for Molesting Bharat-Mata symbol and the great Personalities of the Nation . What do you expect from traditionally meat eating Kashmiri Brahmins, who have produced Nehru’s etc. same applies to traditionally fish eating Bengali Brahmins. They are Ravan of the Sat Yug Time. Hate them and expose them. So it is not surprising that Islam is taking over those areas. Since Brahmins should be setting example for Hindus to follow, fallen Brahmins are disaster for the areas they are from. When Gulab Singh took over Kashmir most of the Muslims in Kashmir, who were forcibly converted to Islam by successive Muslims, wanted to convert back to Hinduism and Gulab singh also wanted that to happen. It is tooth and nail opposition from Kashmiri Pundits that prevented it from happening. Now we are complaining about losing Kashmir. Other important thing is discipline and commitment rather than numbers are important. In long term your attempt will fail in the same manner as Secularists attempts to unite Hindu Muslims, because of inherent contradictions. What Hindus need is to take pride in their religion, support social reformers like Gandhijis etc. who accept image worship, reject religious compromisers. I am equally, if not more, pained to know Delhi High Court Justice Sanjay Kaul's verdict in favour of the most hateful painter M.F. Husain. This Husain has committed greater iconoclasm with his brush than Aurangzeb and other Mohammedan invaders did with their hammers and tongs on Hindu temples in the medieval period. This is all due to the anti-Hindu regime right since 1947. Attacks on Hindus and Hindu icons is likely to be more in the coming period. Kaul's verdict that Husain's opposition is by "largely ignorant crowd" is indicative of his madness. Greater shame is, however, on the huge Hindu organizations, like the RSS and the VHP, who swear by Hindu Dharma, Hindu culture and pose to be their greatest protectors and promoters. The case was largely lost because only a junior advocate presented the Hindu case, while renowned senior advocates pleaded in favour of Husain. The said Hindu organizations kept themselves out of the picture. You ought to know that in India it is not the merit of the case but the status of the lawyers which decide the cases in courts of law. The Delhi High Court’s historic decision to decriminalize gay sex equates “sexual orientation” with gender, caste, and religion as identities that enjoy Constitutional protection. But while the verdict itself is unprecedented, the two judges who ruled in the case have a distinguished record of expanding Constitutional rights to protect the marginalized. The 105-page judgment that combines judicial innovation with an inclusive vision, written by Chief Justice A P Shah and Justice S Muralidhar fits perfectly with their record. Many of Justice Shah’s past decisions have been sensitive to the physically and mentally disabled. In 2005, he held that a staff nurse could not be fired by a state-run hospital after being diagnosed with schizophrenia. He also prevented the Railway police from evicting blind hawkers from a platform. In 2008, Chief Justice Shah along with Justice Muralidhar, slammed the Delhi government for not hiring special educators and physicians to cater to dyslexic students in schools run by the Municipal Council of Delhi. The Delhi High Court’s Chief Justice Shah along with Justice Muralidhar so called historic decision to decriminalize gay sex equates “sexual orientation” with gender, caste, and religion as identities that enjoy Constitutional protection which mending the law in the context of ARTICLE 372 Of our Constitution would have faced by Alien power difficult to introduce the concept of Homosexuality. But while the verdict itself is absurd unprecedented, the two judges who ruled in the case have a biased record of expanding Constitutional rights to protect the marginalized. The 105-page judgment, that combines judicial innovation with an inclusive vision, written by Chief Justice A P Shah and Justice S Muralidhar fits perfectly with their record of the condemnation by the people at large. Many of Justice Shah’s past decisions have been appears to be sensitive to the physically and mentally disabled, but they were delivered to create publicity with pernicious and reprehensible conduct . In 2005, he held that a staff nurse could not be fired by a state-run hospital after being diagnosed with schizophrenia, was the example of his concealed sympathy with retarded personality and a zeal to earn publicity. He also prevented the Railway police from evicting blind hawkers from a platform and thereby to provide manace to the public at large.. In 2008, Chief Justice Shah along with Justice Muralidhar, slammed the Delhi government for not hiring special educators and physicians to cater to dyslexic students in schools run by the Municipal Council of Delhi. Whether this judicial activism after review of the corruption cases of Smt Shila Dixit in Allotment of D.D.A. Flats and there by imposing 50 Lacks as the fine is the correct Judgment. M.C. Mehta Case in Mis-utilization of the water Of Bias River to his Hotel and imposition of fine of Rs. 50 Lakhs has been scrapped . It appears that in the lust of publicity this judge appears to have crave out his indulgence of opportunist to please Smt. Sania Manio of turin alias Sonia Gandhi,( governing The Nation) a roman catholic, as after the condemnation of Roman Catholics, on account of having the maximum incidence of Child Abuse, might have insisting upon by POPE to spread the message of Open Sex Education in our country., The judgement would have rendered in lieu of his proposed elevation as the Judge Of Supreme Court. The learned judges of delhi High court seemed to have been driven by their own hunger for publicity and to do something that breaks the path.Like a bored busnessman diversifying recklessly just for heck of it. Courts are not competent to make comments on matters of human conduct in the realm of religion and basic biological processes. Judges have exceeded their jurisdiction and thus deserve to be condemned. In my view it would be appropriate to relieve them from august duty of a judge of high court. The argument is almost foolish and naive. "It is love and not sin". Homosexual act is not love but distorted mentality.Act odf sex itself cant be called love.Homosexuality is disease of mind.If the judges' argument of human right is accepted then a mother having sex with her son by consent should also be normal and human right.The judges obviously lack basic undrstanding of concept of human rights and fundamental rights. To say that homoexuality is fundamental right to live cant be more ridiculous and sick proposition.Sex is right to live? what utter nonsense? It is time Government of India intervene and stop India becoming a mentaly sick and rotten society like in USA or Germany.The homo sexuals should be put behind bars and in mental hospitals. Such judges should be sent home. These judges dont bother to finish pending cases of hundreds of fundamental and human rights violation.They get time to settle sex cases of homosexuality. They forget that 2 crores cases are pending in courts with our third rate and rotten judiciary and judicial system characterized by rampant corruption and mismanagement and unaccountability. A old parent seeking for financial support is less urgent to these judges han homosexuality rights. It is sickening. I would advise Government to remove these judges from courts immediately and get this judgment reversed. or otherwise parliament should pass a legislation to clip wings of this stupid and sick judgement. The people of India may wake up and stop addressing to these lunatic publicity hunger and opportunist judges as MY LORD any more. We should not forget that act of sex is basically designed by nature for procreation and hence same sex homosexuality is anti-nature.and anti-nationalist concept being introduced by foreign invaders

Hindus also throng to religious places of other faiths in mazaars/peers, so much so that many of the mazaars/peers are maintained and looked after by the Hindus only. It is beyond doubt that most of the Muslim peers are flourishing because of Hindus only, and will be shut if Hindus stop visiting them. Hindus are always eager to appease the other communities by following their customs/rituals. We may justify it as secularism but actually it reflects our wavering faith in our own Gods and Goddesses. On the contrary, rarely is a follower of other faiths seen in our temples or practicing our rituals. Lack of faith in one deity has seriously affected unity among the Hindus and has lead to disorganization and weakening of the Hinduism. On thousands of occasions, Hindus have miserably failed to protect the respect of their Gods and Goddesses and religious places. This dilutes the devotion & enthusiasm and also impels a sense of ridicule for our religion in the minds of others. This is solely because of non-availability of a centralised religious command.
When Hindus Zimmi were called to pay their Jazia, they were kept in their standing position like the gloater’s Goat and seized by their collar and vigorously shaken and there after pulled about. Quazi Mughisuddin of Bayana Stated that the Hindu Khirajguzar or the payer of jazia is he who, on being ordered by Muslims collecting Jazia, choose to spit into his mouth opens without hesitation, so that Muslims may spit into his mouth. The loyalty, dependency and deniability of the Hindus by the armies of Muslims increased in its multiplicity after the defeat of Pakistan in 1965, 1971 wars by them and their Kargil attack by the Indian army on their intruders. The Sachhar Commission report for giving empowerment to the Muslims always suspeticle to the progress of the Nation will be another burden on our economy and they will betray the trust reposed upon them as they do not belong top our Nation, but are an aggressor to the integrity, solidarity and nationality to our nation. These Muslims will always be responding to the call of their religion for committing atrocities upon the rest of the population of Hindus as they are regarded vas an infidels according to the verses of Quran. It is the dire necessity that the book which spread animosity with peace loving receptive citizens, who remained non violent upon the rest of Indian converted Muslims may not be provoked, as was being provoked in post Godhara retaliation against the agents of death of 76 Ram Bakst passengers, no government can protect the happening of Civil Disobedience by committing the further atrocities upon the defensive Hindus. It is doubtful that if the war takes place between India and Pakistan, the Muslim Soldier will fight against the enemy, but they will start slaughtering our own Soldier and as such, till it is not too late, the protectors of our nation from the external aggression may take over the command to eliminate the evil of religious fanatics from the map of independent Nation. Muslman , according to their Quran look upon the Hindus as Kafir , who deserve to be killed and exterminated rather than being protected.
Dargha Kawaja sahib Act 1995 enjoys the enormous privilege to the Muslim community. Over half of the Land of Jaunpur city and nearly all the hillocks of Kannauj are the Wakf territory. Ahmadabad has 13% of its locality as Wakf property while Kolkata exceeds 5% and Patna 8% of Wakf for using it as an instrument of Jihad. A degree of ruthlessness is inevitable if the growth of Islam is to be sustained. Jihad was made as integral tenet of religion for conquest and conversion to Islam. More Muslims than kafir, more faithful than Infidels Hindus are collectively the pre conditions of Darul e Islam. Even in Darul e herb the scope of co existence with Hindu Counter Part is Sine quo non of the secularist. If the Muslims professes the virtue of secularism it is there tactics for survival by adopting Al takiya which justifies the deception, fraud, repudiation of promise and abrogate and subjugate Hindus through iconoclasm.
Aurangzeb's forman to provinces to destroy all Hindu temples and schools. As many as 5,000 temples were destroyed under him—a minimum of 200 in 1679 alone. On the anniversary of the Babri Masjid demolition (December 6, 1992), it is important for Hindus (and Muslims) to understand the importance of the event in the context of Hindustan's history, past and recent, present and the future. Savages at a very low level of civilisation and no culture worth the name, from Arabia and west Asia, began entering India from the early century onwards. Islamic invaders demolished countless Hindu temples, shattered uncountable sculpture and idols, plundered innumerable palaces and forts of Hindu kings, killed vast numbers of Hindu men and carried off Hindu women. This story, the educated-and a lot of even the illiterate Indians-know very well. History books tell it in remarkable detail. But many Indians do not seem to recognise that the alien Muslim marauders destroyed the historical evolution of the earth's most mentally advanced civilisation, the most richly imaginative culture, and the most vigorously creative society. It is clear that India at the time when Muslim invaders turned towards it (8 to 11th century) was the earth's richest region for its wealth in precious and semi-precious stones, gold and silver, religion and culture, and its fine arts and letters. Tenth century Hindustan was also too far advanced than its contemporaries in the East and the West for its achievements in the realms of speculative philosophy and scientific theorising, mathematics and knowledge of nature's workings. Hindus of the early medieval period were unquestionably superior in more things than the Chinese, the Persians (including the Sassanians), the Romans and the Byzantines of the immediate proceeding centuries. The followers of Siva and Vishnu on this subcontinent had created for themselves a society more mentally evolved-joyous and prosperous too-than had been realised by the Jews, Christians, and Muslim monotheists of the time. Medieval India, until the Islamic invaders destroyed .It, was history's most richly imaginative culture and one of the five most advanced civilisations of all times.
Look at the Hindu art that Muslim iconoclasts severely damaged or destroyed. Ancient Hindu sculpture is vigorous and sensual in the highest degree-more fascinating than human figural art created anywhere else on earth. (Only statues created by classical Greek artists are in the same class as Hindu temple sculpture). Ancient Hindu temple architecture is the most awe-inspiring, ornate and spell-binding architectural style found anywhere in the world. (The Gothic art of cathedrals in France is the only other religious architecture that is comparable with the intricate architecture of Hindu temples). No artist of any historical civilisation have ever revealed the same genius as ancient Hindustan's artists and artisans. Their minds filled with venom against the idol-worshippers of Hindustan, the Muslims destroyed a large number of ancient Hindu temples. This is a historical fact, mentioned by Muslim chroniclers and others of the time. A number of temples were merely damaged and remained standing. But a large number-not hundreds but many thousands-of the ancient temples were broken into shreds of cracked stone. In the ancient cities of Varanasi and Mathura, Ujjain and Maheshwar, Jwalamukhi and Dwarka, not one temple survives whole and intact from the ancient times. The wrecking of Hindu temples went on from the early years of the 8th century to well past 1700 AD a period of almost 1000 years. Every Muslim ruler in Delhi (or Governor of Provinces) spent most of his time warring against Hindu kings in the north and the south, the east and the west, and almost every Muslim Sultan and his army commanders indulged in largescale destructions of Hindu temples and idols. They also slaughtered a lot of Hindus. It is easy to conclude that virtually every Hindu temple built in the ancient times is a perfect work of art. The evidence of the ferocity with which the Muslim invaders must have struck at the sculptures of gods and goddesses, demons and apsaras, kings and queens, dancers and musicians is frightful. At so many ancient temples of Rajasthan and Madhya Pradesh, for example, shattered portions of stone images still lie scattered in the temple courtyards. Considering the fury used on the idols and sculptures, the stone-breaking axe must have been applied to thousands upon thousands of images of hypnotic beauty. Giving proof of the resentment that men belonging to an inferior civilisation feel upon encountering a superior civilisation of individuals with a more refined culture, Islamic invaders from Arabia and western Asia broke and burned everything beautiful they came across in Hindustan. So morally degenerate were the Muslim Sultans that, rather than attract Hindu "infidels" to Islam through force of personal example and exhortation, they just built a number of mosques at the sites of torn down temples-and foolishly pretended they had triumphed over the minds and culture of the Hindus. I have seen stones and columns of Hindu temples incorportated into the architecture of several mosques, including the Jama Masjid and Ahmed Shah Masjid in Ahmedabad; the mosque in the Uparkot fort of Junagadh (Gujarat) and in Vidisha (near Bhopal); the Adhai Din Ka Jhonpra right next to the famous dargah in Ajmer-and the currently controversial Bhojshala "mosque" in Dhar (near Indore). Hindu culture was at its imaginative best and vigorously creative when the severely-allergic-to-images Muslims entered Hindustan. Islamic invaders did not just destroy countless temples and constructions but also suppressed cultural and religious practices; damaged the pristine vigour of Hindu religion, prevented the intensification of Hindu culture, debilitating it permanently, stopped the development of Hindu arts ended the creative impulse in all realms of thought and action, damaged the people's cultural pride, disrupted the transmission of values and wisdom, cultural practices and tradition from one generation to the next; destroyed the proper historical evolution of Hindu kingdoms and society, affected severely the acquisition of knowledge, research and reflection and violated the moral basis of Hindu society. The Hindus suffered immense psychic damage. The Muslims also plundered the wealth of the Hindu kingdoms, impoverished the Hindu populace, and destroyed the prosperity of Hindustan. Gaze in wonder at the Kailas Mandir in the Ellora caves and remember that it is carved out of a solid stone hill, an effort that (inscriptions say) took nearly 200 years. This is art as devotion. The temple built by the Rashtrakuta kings (who also built the colossal sculpture in the Elenhanta caves off Mumbai harbour) gives proof of the ancient Hindus' religious fervor. But the Kailas temple also indicated a will power, a creative imagination, and an intellect eager to take on the greatest of artistic challenges. The descendants of those who built the magnificent temples of Bhojpur and Thanjavur, Konark and Kailas, invented mathematics and brain surgery, created mindbody disciplines (yoga) of astonishing power, and built mighty empires would almost certainly have attained technological superiority over Europe. It is not just for "political reasons" that Hindus want to build grand temples at the sites of the (wrecked) Babri Masjid in Ayodhya, the Gyanvapi mosque in Varanasi, and the Mathura idgah. The efforts of religion-intoxicated and politically active Hindus to rebuild the Ram Mandir, the Kashi Vishwanath Mandir, and the Krishna Mandir are just three episodes m a one-thousand year long Hindu struggle to reclaim their culture and religion from alien invaders. The demolition of the Babri Masjid in Ayodhya on 6 December 1992 was just one episode in the millennial struggle of the Hindus to repossess their religion-centered culture and nation. Meanwhile, hundreds of ancient Hindu temples forsaken all over Hindustan await the reawakening of Hindu cultural pride to be repaired or rebuilt and restored to their original, ancient glory. The philosophy of non-violence has made us cowards and the Hindus on the excuse of non-violence do not even protect their own person & property, what to talk of common interest. The Hindus are not ready to bear pain involved in fighting for their own rights and always look towards others to fight for them. This philosophy has made us cowards to such an extent that we did not retaliate even the invaders who attacked us in our homeland. Just a handful of Muslim invaders attacked us, captured us, slew us, converted many to Islam, outraged the modesty of our women, broke our temples and used every possible atrocity to destroy Hinduism but the philosophy of non-violence made the Hindus surrender everywhere. Secularism (or pseudo-secularism?) has done immeasurable harm to Hinduism. The selfish Hindu leadership, both religious & political, is always eager to compromise the interest of Hindus for transient gains, in the name of secularism, without realizing the harm caused to the religion in the long run. Is this secularism not applicable to Muslims? Never does a Muslim ever talk of respect to the other faiths. The Muslim invaders exercised every atrocity to finish the Hindu race. They believed in dar-ul-Islam (converting the whole human race into Islamism). The only language they know is jehad and for them jehad denotes just killing qafirs i.e. everyone who does not follow Islam. The objective of dar-ul-Islam is very much alive even today. The whole world today is under the perpetual threat of Muslim fundamentalism. Muslim invaders looted & demolished thousands of temples and erected mosques over them, but redeeming Ram Temple from underneath Babri mosque is the “blackest day”.Islam is not the true religion, but the political massage conveyed by Muhammad, which perished his own generations forever. Think for a moment, when the creator of the Universe, the almighty and all- knowing has created every body, how does the Muslims have got a right to kill goat or Sheep, instead of their own Son. Why the people born as Hindus, Shiks, Jain and Buddhist be Killed in Terrorist attack. Why does Muhammad could not save his own son, when he proclaims to be Prophets or the Messenger of God. Why Jews should abandon their JUDAISM religion AND BECOME MUSLIMS?. Religion of Islam was started by Mohd shahab alleged/ Said to the Prophet sent to earth by the God Almighty in about the middle of the 7th century A. D. The followers of this religion are called the Muslims. Mohd was born in Saudi Arabia in a tribe by the name of Queresh. This is one of the three Semetic faiths that grew up finally into a very strong belief under the name of Islam. The word Islam in Arabic language means Peace. The other Semeitc faiths are Judaism followed by Jews and the third is Christianity that came into being with the birth and death of Jesus Christ. In the above three faiths, there are some similarities. All the three faiths accept their initiators as the messengers or sons of God. They also similarly place their unquestioned trust in their respective holy called books called as 1. OLD TESTAMENT (Judaism started by Moses) 2. NEW TESTAMENT or Bible (Christianity started by Lord Jesus) and 3. ISLAM (started Mohd. with its holy book called QUARAN). All the three faiths thus draw their inspirations from their respective books and the initators of the same. While the Old Testament and the Bible were first written in the Hebrew language, Quaran the holy book of Islam came to be written in the Arabic. The followers of al the three religions thus owe their allegiance to their respective books and to their initiators. Naturally, the followers of each Sect restrict themselves within the close circle of their holy book’s contents and develop a special fraternal relationship between themselves as the respective followers of their faiths. The human society as such is therefore divided on the basis of the following of what said in their respective holy books. Beyond the following, the rest of the humanity is not accorded any special or otherwise fraternal sort of relationship. All the three faiths do not bring within its embrace, all humans tied together as the fellow humans. Therefore, these sects create within the society and narrow circles of brotherhood based on the fellowship of the followers only. Whereas, religion as followed by the humans should have a tendency of uniting the entire human society under some special social code. The above named Semetic faiths divide the society into narrow sects. This is very much unlike the ancient Aryan’s Sanatan Dharma about which India’s every sacred religious scripture speck in terms of 1. Vasudevam Kutumbkam 2. Sarva Dharma Sambhava 3. Vasudevam Kutumbkam means that the whole world is one family. Sarva Dharma Sambhava means it is possible to accommodate all faiths and religions at the same time. The followers of Judaism called the Jews have their holy city in Jerusalem. Christianity came out of Judaism. Lord Jesus was its cause. Its holy place of birth is at Bethlehem presently in Israel. Somehow, there were some differences in the contents of the Old Testament and the propogatory statement of Lord Jesus. Some Jews were opposed to the same. A governor appointed on behalf of the ruler of Rome in Bethlehem was led to prosecute and hang Lord Jesus on the Cross. However, a few followers of Lord Jesus continued to spread his message. Three hundred years later came King Constantine who accepted Christianity that grew into a forceful and strong faith that soon spread around Rome & in other parts of Europe. In the 11th century, the Roman Empire stood split in two parts into west and east. The Western Roman Empire and the Western Church accepted Rome as their guiding light of faiths and polities. The Eastern Roman Empire was guided from Constantinople now called Istanbul. The Western Roman Church accepted its leader at Rome and called him the Pope who ruled over the entire Western Europe and Western Church. The followers of Pope are called the Catholice. The Eastern Church that split up did not accept Rome and Pope as their leader. Hence, Russia, Greece, Georgia, Syria, and some more Eastern European countries followed their own revised religious ideas. Some strong feelings of Nationalism exhibit a natural tendency within humans. This brings about a sense of commonness among a group of humans when it is based upon some common gains to be made by the humans inhabiting some territory that is politically governed for them. It is not only but natural that a homogeneous society comes into being. A feeling of Nationalism is in fact an emotional upsurge that unites all people onto one society when the emotions involved work to uplift the humans inhabiting a territory governed in their intrests.

Indian society by virtue of sub-continent’s a large mass of land provide such basis. This singular geographical entity itself is responsible for unifying all its inhabitants to adopt and work for some common kind of social and cultural upliftment. On top of its, the great land mass with flowing rivers of water further provides such a National cohesion. Such factors are divinely given to the people of India. A great stretch of plains with one commonness provides to Indian people, not only a sense of unity but it delivers to one and all, a sense of fraternity. This is because of society’s common concern. This has over the centuries of time repened into a common cultural, social, economical and spiritual faith. The most important singular factor that binds a nation is the faith of people in their ancestry and religion. Put together, it is termed as ‘Nationality’. Ancient Indian sages, their spirituals pursuits and messages of one world family (Vasu-devam Kutummbkam) have greatly contributed to the very thought process of one India. Max Muller, Dr. Annie Beasant and several other world leaders of the past have openly declared, India without Hinduism is unthinkable. An independent India and her people are thus divinely ordained to protect their spiritual chord of National unity in which social and cultural emotions in commonness can be seen. We have therefore to take particular care of Hindutva philosophy that provides such a strong force of one commonness. This in turn does have its roots in India’s ancient religion. The religion has its roots in the minds of every Indian. Any attack on this activity and faith shall therefore need a very strong fencing around the philosophical principles of the Vedas. It is from there that such feelings of Indian Nationalism and Hinduism have grown. The latter is not merely a faith or belief in any sort of Gospel’s spread and introduced by its thinker, but Hinduism is in fact a way of life lived by the Indian people since time immemorial. Indianism and Hinduism have thus to be unabashedly declared as synonymous. It is this singular factor that provides to India its real inherent strength of every sort. This is regardless of the method chosen for its political governance. Any idea contrary to this is suicidal and hence must be opposed with all the strength that the people of India can muster. Unlike original Indian political thinker like Tilak, Lajpaat Raj, Vipin Chander Paul and other such like political Leaders of the generations, the recent political Leaders like Gandhi and Nehru in fact can under the influence of the British system of education. A clear change towards Westernism became noticeable in the Indian history. This began with Gandhi and Nehru both diluting their inner feelings towards Hinduism and in its place, they substituted prematurely a sort of secularism. Indeed, this affected the minds of the people of India. Nothing more could please the British Imperialists who desired Indian society to split into groups based on anything other than one religion. Hindus being in majority were to be taken special care of. India came to be finally balkanized into two separate independent nations of India and Pakistan. The latter stood further divided into Pakistan and Bangladesh. The drawing of the date of freedom from the British yoke was delayed only because of the success of Mr. Jinnha of the Muslim league who openly declared that Hindu and Muslims in India were two separate nations. This came to be called to be a Two Nation Theory. The British supported this. Those Hindu and Muslims who had lived together for past centuries suddenly mistrusted each other on religious grounds till an open demand for the Muslims to convert Hindu India (Darul Herb) into (Darul Islam) a State governed totally by the Muslims. It is thus, a clear defeat of the Congress Leaders that was responsible for the geographical division of the sub-continent into two different sovereign countries. Hence, with such a historical past, reemergence of the political situation this time created by the left over Muslims in India after the partition of the country, does definitely arouse the legitimate concern to the majority population of the Hindus in India. Indeed, Hindus are rightly apprehensive to ensure what is left of the sub-continent is not allowed to drift into Darul Islam once again. To wipe off any Darul Herb, is the declared policy of the Millat (Pan Islamic fraternity). This sort of gradual maturity can be seen in the Indian State of J & K. hence, unless Hindus ancient acting as one common Nation unite themselves into a strong Nation with it as its sole aim, the country does run a great risk in times to come to convert the whole of India into Darul Islam. Muslims do not and cannot accept any non-believer as equal to them and hence Modi of Gujarat is too right when he cautions Indian people UNITE to safeguard themselves from the Muslim invasion who are waiting only to convert India from Darul Herb to Darul Islam and now openly say and believe in HAM PAANCH- HAMARRE PACCHIS. Islamic propaganda is responsible for untrue Idea of murdering and robbing the innocent people. No god shall resort to reward for such abomination--- No god shall resort to sex and violence for securing followers. This is last blasphemous for being injurious to the concept of divinity. Muslims mutilating the genitals of girls. If this is inherent in the teaching of Koran, Muhammad had epileptic fits. The process accompanied by snoring and reddening of the face was mis- interoperated as a divine communication of Angel Gabriel from heaven. Khadija asked Muhammad to have a sexual intercourse with her and Gabriel disappeared. The ‘sexual intercourse test’ confirmed the divinity. The “hypocrites” had probably no preconceived notion of what a prophet should be like. The evil coalition of muslims fanatics, comunitics and pseudo secular media has launched a propaganda war against Hindus to defame India. Manorities in India enjoy complete freedom and equality and have full right for maintaining and spreading their culture, their educational institution are aided by government and their mosques are free from any government interference. Muslims recives a subsidyfor going on pilgrimage to mecca at the rate of Rs 16000/-per head. Killing captives in cold blood was cruel enough. The new creed, weakened old ties and strengthened his “ummah Consciousness”. The communism encouraged to denounced their parents to strengthened their “class consciousness”. Ideologies and attitudes lead to similar values and usages. This is Arab Imperialism. The Islamic brotherhood was junked the very day Muhammad died. The assassination of Imam Ali, the Son in Law, Imam hassan, the Grand son, Imam Husayn, Another Grand Son, Whose head was kicked like Football, the son of Husayn –Imam Zaynul- Abidin,Imam Muhammad –Baquir, his son Imam jafar Sadiq imam Musa Ouazim, Imam Rida, His Son namely Imam Muhammad Taqi, His son Imam Ali Naqi, his son Imam Hasan _I Aksari and his son Imam Mahdi for whom the Shias still believed that they disappeared on underground passage in Surra- man- Rao and are still alive. The geeration of Muslims killed each other over politics, which was generated by Muhammad. A degree of ruthlessness is the inevitable, if the purity as well as the of Islam is to be sustained. Jihad was made as integral tenet of religion. It means to conquests and conversion of the conquered to islam. More Muslims than Kafirs, More faithful than infidels, collectively participated in Darul E Islam by conversion of Darul E herb. India from 1889 onwards was not invaded by any alien power, but it has been ruined by the Hindus Traitors providing their off springs to be enjoyed by these ruthless invaders for giving them the lust of power and as such most of the Rajputana dynasty in Rajasthan could have preserved their identity after ambulation of the property of Jat Rulers at Agra and Maurya Dynasty in Udaipur and Chittor with the help of Mogul conquers. The case of Rani Padamawati and thousands of her contemporized ladies and Maha Rani Laxmi Bai during British Period are the instances of the women pride, vigour in order to preserve their dignity from these agents of death and deserting Arab traditions. The scope of co existence in Muslim ideology with their Hindus counter parts is Sine quo non in secularist status, but Muslims profess the virtues of secularism as their tactics for their survival even after committing the onslaught upon the majority of the people. Each grave yard occupies at least 5 Sq. Yard of land in Darul e herb, even if the remains of the corpus after being eaten by the insects and degenerated into the naught. This is another method to capture the power by usurpation of the landed property belonging to Hindus. They suffer in their graveyards as even the reflex generated in the body through nervous system generates the feeling of mantle agony and frustration as a repercussion and painful reminders of the crime committed upon the innocent non violent Hindu society. This is a political agenda promulgated by the group of dacoits, robbers and to plunder non violent Hindus society of our nation. Combating terrorism, now being discredited by intolerant fanatics and opportunists politician, under whom ,the elite citizen, responsible for the executive functioning and the Investigating agencies responsible to protect the sovereign power of the State are knee down in anticipation of their posting for greasing their palm. This is the greatest problem of the world. It has become the threat to the Nations, who encouraged it during the process of the struggle of cold war, with fellow nation. The god of hated filled cult having its mandate to get the rid of the world of proclaimed “infidels” and “heretics”, are themselves struggling against their own weaknesses The kingdom of Arabia was formulated on the principles, that this world rejected all type of injustice, violence, breach of peace, bloodshed, murder and plunder. Jihad was defined after the battle of Bard. It is written in the “Kitbag al Tauhid”. The tomb of Prophet Muhammad was virtually destroyed in 1803 at Medina and People Stripped the Kaba at Makah. These people were declared Blasphemous. Virtually “Jihad”, which was earlier known as the struggle against oppression and rather a struggle against their own weakness, has started combating against their own people. There was the reformation. People disallowed ceremonies for marriage and death. They prohibited the worship of the saints, adorning of graves, tomb and monuments. They prohibited and provided the restriction upon holding religious processions, sharing art, music and dance and provided the proper place to women as their god only exposes fickleness of their minds. Most of the Muslim peers are flourishing, because of Hindus only, and will be shut if Hindus stop visiting them. The mosquitoes are flying in the air to drag the blood from the body of the defenseless Non violent citizen. Mosquitoes, even lesser in number, will suck the blood of Majority. They become the scorpions, if the number of carnivorous human being are proportionately increased to insufficient numbers. These people are viper snake converted to Cobra. The number of these poisonous reptiles Increased. Even, if they increased in quarter to the number of other community, they become pythons. Stop them from doing So in India, otherwise we will be buttered, as Hindus are Buttered in Bangladesh, Malaysia and Pakistan. The submissive nature of the Hindus is evident even today, even a single person of other faiths Hindus are credulous by nature. They simply believed what others said without suspecting the ulterior designs of the enemy. There were occasions when the idealist Hindu rulers sincerely honored a treaty or ceasefire in war but the crook enemy took undue advantage of their credulousness and captured them. A world without Islam—admittedly an almost inconceivable state of affairs given its charged centrality in our daily news headlines. Islam seems to lie behind a broad range of international disorders: suicide attacks, car bombings, military occupations, resistance struggles, riots, fatwas, jihads, guerrilla warfare, threatening videos, and 9/11 itself. Why are these things taking place? “Islam” seems to offer an instant and uncomplicated analytical touchstone, enabling us to make sense of today’s convulsive world. Indeed, for some neoconservatives, “Islam fascism” is now our sworn foe in a looming “World War III.”But indulge me for a moment. What if there were no such thing as Islam? What if there had never been a Prophet Mohammed, no saga of the spread of Islam across vast parts of the Middle East, Asia, and Africa? Given our intense current focus on terrorism, war, and rampant anti-Americanism—some of the most emotional international issues of the day—it’s vital to understand the true sources of these crises. Is Islam, in fact, the source of the problem, or does it tend to lie with other less obvious and deeper factors? For the sake of argument, in an act of historical imagination, picture a Middle East in which Islam had never appeared. Would we then be spared many of the current challenges before us? Would the Middle East be more peaceful? How different might the character of East-West relations be? Without Islam, surely the international order would present a very different picture than it does today. Or would it? In any democracy, media is the most potent weapon of attack and shield of defence. In India, most of print and electronic media is controlled by anti-Hindu forces. Most of this media is denigrating Hinduism, spreading misinformation about Hindu scriptures, and hurting Hindu sentiments. Besides though Hinduism is based on Vedas which stipulate a casteless society, anti-Hindu media is dividing Hindu society on the basis of caste. Genocide and eviction of Hindus from Kashmir are no news whereas Gujarat riots which started after Hindu rail passengers were torched at Godhra are always in the news. Infiltration of crores of Pak-Bangla nationals threatening to create one more Islamic country on Indian soil finds no space in media. Similarly, conversion of poorer Hindus to Christianity by fraud, inducement and coercion creates no ripples in media. It is deplorable that though there are many country-wide newspapers and television channels promoting anti-Hinduism and fake secularism, there is no all-India pro-Hindu daily news paper, or television channel projecting Hindu concerns. Surprisingly, no Hindu organization has given this subject the importance it deserves. De-Hinduized by Macaulayan education and brain-washed by anti-Hindu media, most Hindus know nothing about Hindu religion, scriptures, heritage and history, and therefore, are passive to attacks on Hinduism. In this dismal situation, only pro-Hindu mass media can educate Hindus about Hindu religion, heritage and history; liberate them from conceptual confusion and fake secularism, and make them pro-active to save Hinduism from demolition. Since all the problems facing Hindu society can be solved with the help of pro-Hindu media, all organizations and individuals must help to create the all-India pro-Hindu daily news papers and television channels at the earliest. This is the only way to save Hinduism. Hindus have forgotten the message: "Dharmo Rakshiti Rakshitah" (One who protects Dharma is protected by Dharma). Though as per Hinduism, Dharma (righteousness), Artha (material possessions), Kama (worldly desires) and Moksha (liberation from re-birth) constitute four purusharthas (human pursuits), most Hindus have forgotten their Dharma, their foremost duty. Hindus must defend their Dharma; and live with dignity, and without being discriminated against. Hindus have a glorious heritage of thousands of years which they must cherish and preserve. Hindus have fought repeated onslaughts, and preserved Hinduism over the centuries whereas all other native religions and civilizations have been wiped off from the earth by expansionist religions. Every Hindu family must devote time and resources to protect Hinduism. Many Hindus feel that since Hinduism has survived for thousands of years, it will continue to flourish for ever. But they overlook the worst ever attacks threatening Hinduism now. They also ignore the fact that Hinduism has been banished from Afghanistan, Pakistan and Bangladesh which also used to be Hindu lands. Hindus must remember that only a combination of wisdom and valour will ensure survival of Hinduism as Bhagvad Gita's last Shloka declares, "Yatra yogeshwarah Krishno yatra Paartho dhanurdharah, / tatra shreervijayo bhootirdhruvaa neetir matirmama" (Where Krishna, the Lord of yoga, and Arjuna, the wielder of bow are there; prosperity, victory, success, and glory will follow). While Hindus from India in Germany have rarely attempted to open temples, Hindu Tamils who fled the conflict in Sri Lanka have been eager to establish their own places of worship, as have members of the smaller Hindu community from Afghanistan. Opening places of worship has gone along with the creation of institutional structures necessary for organizing and maintaining the temples. Hindu traditions are kept as much as possible, but it is usually not possible to hold the full daily schedule of religious services.Out of two dozen Tamil temples in Germany (the first one established in 1988), only one is purpose built (in Hamm, opened in 2002), while another one is under construction in Berlin; all the others have been installed in converted factories or warehouses, in flats or in basements. Consequently, many of them are still seen as temporary places, to be enlarged or replaced by new temples in the future. The author expects that future temples will align more closely with the traditional south Indian models; for the time being, financial considerations or zoning regulations have been preeminent in decisions such as the orientation of the temples and the choice of locations. Hinduism has become increasingly established in the U.S. through a series of encounters over the past 150 years. These encounters are emblematic of Americans' increasing familiarity with Indian, and Asian, traditions; of contact between Americans and Indian immigrants, and of relationships among cultural traditions in a society that is self-consciously pluralistic. Two distinct forms of Hinduism have contributed to these encounters. In recent public lectures, Professor Vasudha Narayanan of the University of Florida has classified Hindu institutions in America today into two categories from Hindu tradition: 1. organizations that promote self-help practices (e.g. yoga, meditation), and 2. organizations that provide the means for formal ritual worship (e.g. temples). The engagement of Ralph Waldo Emerson and Henry David Thoreau with the famous Hindu text, the Bhagavad Gita (via Charles Wilkins' 1785 translation), represents a notable early American encounter with Hindu ideals. Both authors viewed the Gita as an important Asian contribution to the consideration of familiar philosophical issues, especially the nature of self-discipline. As members of the literati, Emerson and Thoreau approached the Gita through self-study and reflection: Emerson wrote of his reactions to the text in his letters and journals, and Thoreau brought the text on his pilgrimage along the Concord and Merrimack Rivers. In their writings, knowledge of Asian tradition is an intellectual and spiritual pilgrimage. Instruction in the nature of Hindu ideals by a Hindu representative came some 40 years later, in the very public forum of the 1893 World's Parliament of Religions in Chicago. Swami Vivekananda (1863-1902), a disciple of Ramakrishna, authoritatively presented the Hindu worldview to an appreciative crowd. Sincerely—and shrewdly—he emphasized the worldview according to Advaita Vedanta philosophy, which posits a non-duality between the divine and the essence of humanity. Thus, Vivekananda eschewed the "idolatry" of some forms of Hinduism as "the attempt of undeveloped minds to grasp higher spiritual truths," in favor of an image of Hinduism as a process of spiritual development: "The Hindu religion does not consist in struggles and attempts to believe a certain doctrine or dogma, but in realizing; not in believing, but in being and becoming." The personal spiritual quest of Emerson and Thoreau was thus affirmed, yet Vivekananda placed this quest squarely within the context of the authority of Hindu tradition and the authority of a Hindu teacher. Further, Vivekananda appealed to this image of process in his assertion that all religions were one: "To the Hindu, then, the whole world of religions is only a traveling, a coming up, of different men and women, through various conditions and circumstances, to the same goal. Every religion is only an evolving of God out of the material man; and the same God is the inspirer of all of them. Why, then, are there so many contradictions? They are only apparent, says the Hindu. The contradictions come from the same truth adapting itself to the different circumstances of different natures. It is the same light coming through different colors." It was his assertion of the unity among religions that forged a rapprochement between speaker and audience, and Hinduism and Americans. Vivekananda also hoped that the Americans' encounter with Hinduism would lead to active engagement: One year after the World's Parliament, he established the Vedanta Society in New York, "the first Hindu organization designed to attract American adherents." Other teachers from India also sought to establish early institutions in America for the teaching of Hinduism. Baba Premanand Bharati was a Bengali disciple of Caitanya who lectured in the U.S. for five years and established the Krishna Samaj at the turn of the century. Swami Paramananda spent two years as an assistant at the New York Vedanta Society before establishing his own Vedanta societies in the Boston and Los Angeles areas; in 1923 he founded Ananda Ashrama, a mountain retreat in southern California. Swami Paramahansa Yogananda came to America in 1920 as a delegate to the International Congress of Religious Liberals held in Boston, then settled in America and founded the Yogoda-Satsang (Self-Realization Fellowship). His methodology involved the "science" of Kriya Yoga, which is the "union (yoga) with the Infinite through a certain action or rite (kriya)." Although he published several books on his vision of spiritual path, including the enormously popular Autobiography of a Yogi (1946), Yogananda maintained that a direct relationship with a guru was the key: "Because of certain yogic injunctions, I cannot give a full explanation of Kriya Yoga in the pages of a book intended for the general public. The actual technique must be learned from a Kriyaban or Kriya Yogi; here a broad reference must suffice." The path of self-help, understood both traditionally and by these early Hindu teachers in America, is for a disciple to work toward spiritual liberation through a combination of practice on one's own and instruction from the guru.The Vedanta Society is credited with building the first Hindu temple in the U.S., in San Francisco in 1906; others followed, such as the Hollywood Temple in 1938, and the Santa Barbara Temple in 1956 In keeping with the image of Hinduism Vivekananda had presented to Americans, the focus in these temples tended to be on understanding scripture. The phenomenon of building temples with a focus on the ritual worship of images began in the 1970s and was directly related to the presence of Hindu Indian immigrants in America. In 1965 the Immigration Act liberated the long-frozen immigration of Asians to America by removing the national origins quota system. In addition, the Act's "family reunification" policy facilitated a second wave of Asian immigration. The Hindu temples built in the U.S. during the 1970s can be classified into two categories. One, as ISKCON temples: These temples were built for a specific devotional community, which included both Euro-Americans and Indian-Americans. Two, as Hindu immigrant temples built for the Hindu immigrant community, which tend to incorporate diverse ways of worship as they attempt to bring Hindus together as a cultural community. A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupada (1896-1977), the founder of ISKCON (the International Society for Krishna Consciousness), came to New York City in 1965. Within one year, Prabhupada had established a "storefront ashram" at 26 Second Avenue, where he would give lectures on the Gita every Monday, Wednesday, and Friday from 7:00 p.m. to 9:00 p.m. At those sessions, he would teach young American seekers about bhakti, based upon the teachings of a classical Hindu saint, Chaitanya (1486-1533). Bhakti, a Sanskrit word whose root meanings are sharing, participation, and devotion, is a religious path defined by three interrelated premises: That humankind shares in the nature of divinity; that humankind must participate in the worship of divinity through action--especially chanting God's name; and that humankind must be guided by devotion to God and to a spiritual guru. There is much that can, and has, been written about ISKCON. For the purposes of this essay, we will note that Prabhupada's vision included both the guru-disciple relationship and temple worship. Thus, it combined the personal spiritual quest, embodied by the guru, with traditions of ritual worship. ISKCON built temples in cities across America, with the most famous being the elaborate Palace of Gold in New Vrindaban, West Virginia In north-central New Jersey, there is an ISKCON temple at 100 Jacksonville Road in Towaco (near Parsippany). The temple is a large colonial-style house, set on a hill off a winding country road. The disciples there say that the house has belonged to ISKCON for twenty years. The house is surrounded by a beautiful garden which is tended by disciples. In total, the temple possesses some two and a half acres of land which, according to devotees, makes it liable for taxes, since it falls below the five acre minimum the town requires to bestow tax-free status on religious organizations. Several members live in the house; it is also a gathering place for ISKCON members in this and surrounding areas. There is a wide, open porch that greets one at the top of the stairs up the hill, and indeed the disciples are warm and friendly, in the context of encouraging others to take up the path of bhakti according to ISKCON.

CURSES OF HINDU RELIGION 1. Polytheism (33 crore Gods & Goddesses): The Hindus, who always brag of believing in the existence of one God, in fact, believe in the existence of crores of Gods and Goddesses. While propitiating (appeasing) any one of them, the Hindus claim that the remaining 33 crore Gods and Goddesses are subservient to Him/Her. This is self-contradictory and only indicates our lack of faith in one God. Dendrolatry in the form of worship of trees like peepal, banyan, banana, tulsi and jand etc. and zoolatry in the form of worship of animals as gods only exposes fickleness of our minds. As if and not satisfied with such a big army of Gods, the Hindus also throng to religious places of other faiths like gurudwaras and mazaars/peers, so much so that many of the mazaars/peers are maintained and looked after by the Hindus only. It is beyond doubt that most of the Muslim peers are flourishing because of Hindus only, and will be shut if Hindus stop visiting them. Hindus are always eager to appease the other communities (Muslims, Sikhs, Christians etc.) by following their customs/rituals. We may justify it as secularism but actually it reflects our wavering faith in our own Gods and Goddesses. On the contrary, rarely is a follower of other faiths seen in our temples or practicing our rituals. Lack of faith in one deity has seriously affected unity among the Hindus and has lead to disorganization and weakening of the Hinduism. On thousands of occasions, Hindus have miserably failed to protect the respect of their Gods and Goddesses and religious places.
2. Lack of centralised temporal authority: Unlike other religions, the Hindus have no centralised authority to control & regulate their religious affairs. The four Mathas established by the Shankracharya in 8th century have not proved to be really effective. This makes us unorganised and leads to lack of consensus on trivial issues like dates of Hindu festivals. Our religious scholars seldom agree on single date for festivals leading to celebration of festivals on different dates. This dilutes the devotion & enthusiasm and also impels a sense of ridicule for our religion in the minds of others. This is solely because of non-availability of a centralised religious command.
3. Non-Violence: The philosophy of non-violence has made us cowards and the Hindus on the excuse of non-violence do not even protect their own person & property, what to talk of common interest. The Hindus are not ready to bear pain involved in fighting for their own rights and always look towards others to fight for them. This philosophy has made us cowards to such an extent that we did not retaliate even the invaders who attacked us in our homeland. Just a handful of Muslim invaders attacked us, captured us, slew us, converted many to Islam, outraged the modesty of our women, broke our temples and used every possible atrocity to destroy Hinduism but the philosophy of non-violence made the Hindus surrender everywhere. The submissive nature of the Hindus is evident even today. Even a single person of other faiths like Muslim, Sikh etc. would assert himself proudly and defend his religion whereas a large crowd of Hindus dare not do that even if it is a question of honour of the whole community.
4. Idealism: The philosophy of idealism also proved a bane for the Hindus. On numerous occasions, brave Hindu rulers proved their superiority over the enemy but, out of idealism, instead of finishing him they showed compassion to the captured enemy and let him go scot-free, who later became a threat to them. On the contrary, the enemy never committed such foolishness. He did not miss any occasion to deceive and destroy the Hindus whenever got a chance. It was true not only in the medieval period when Muslims invaded India but in modern times as well. The delusion of slogan of Hindi-Chini Bhai Bhai in 1962, releasing of 90000 Pakistani POWs just for international acclaim while leaving our own POWs to languish in enemy captivity till today and returning the captured areas to Pakistan under the Shimla Agreement in 1971, Lahore Declaration consummating in Kargil episode in 1999 are some glaring examples of our hollow idealism, diplomatic immaturity and foolishness. Gained in the battlefield by our brave soldiers was always lost on the table by our myopic leaders.
5. Secularism: Secularism (or pseudo-secularism?) has done immeasurable harm to Hinduism. The selfish Hindu leadership, both religious & political, is always eager to compromise the interest of Hindus for transient gains, in the name of secularism, without realizing the harm caused to the religion in the long run. Is this secularism not applicable to Muslims? Never does a Muslim ever talk of respect to the other faiths. The Muslim invaders exercised every atrocity to finish the Hindu race. They believed in dar-ul-Islam (converting the whole human race into Islamism). The only language they know is jehad and for them jehad denotes just killing qafirs i.e. everyone who does not follow Islam. The objective of dar-ul-Islam is very much alive even today. The whole world today is under the perpetual threat of Muslim fundamentalism. It is only and only the leaders belonging to Hindu race who are the thekedars of secularism at the cost of their own faith. If there were Jai Chands in medieval times, there are Laloos, Paswans, Mulayams, Arjuns and Advanis in this era, who, for their momentary selfish motives, are selling the interests of the Hindus in the name of secularism without realizing the irreparable loss being caused by them to their community. Gandhi’s secularism always aimed at destruction of Hindus at the hands of Muslims. Paswan’s secularism advocates a Muslim Chief-Minister in Bihar. Arjun’s secularism believes in distorting our history. Numerous such pseudo secularists have always been active to destroy the Hindus. Mulayam’s secularism impels him declare holiday in U.P. on last Friday of Ramjan. Mulayam, Pasvan and even Nitish Kumar throwing Iftaar parties to Muslims and wearing muslim caps on their heads shamelessly is the burning example of pseudo secularism.The irony is that their secularism erupts only when the interests of the non-Hindus are involved. Thousands of Hindus being murdered in Mopla and Naokhali riots before partition, lakhs of Hindus being butchered and crores suffering displacement during partition in 1947 did not make a dint on any of these secularists. Thousands of Hindus being slain in Punjab and Jammu & Kashmir and lakhs being rendered refugees in their own motherland did not shake the soul of the secularists. Conversion of Bangladesh from a secularist to an Islamic nation in 1979 did not perturb these secularists nor did the planned elimination of Hindus in Bangladesh and Pakistan caused qualms of conscience to them. The kar-sewaks burnt alive in Godhra doesn’t make any difference to these secularists, but its reaction in the form of Gujarat riots is termed as a “blot” on humanity and the heads of Bajpais and Advanis are “lowered in shame”. Muslim invaders looted & demolished thousands of temples and erected mosques over them, but redeeming Ram Temple from underneath Babri mosque is the “blackest day” in the life of secularist Advani. Time and again Commissions have been constituted to convict, by hook or crook, the accused of the 1984 Delhi riots and 2002 Gujarat riots even after their acquittal by the courts of law. On the other hand, terrorists like Wassan Singh Zaffarwal and Jagjit Singh Chouhan deserving severe punishment have gone scot-free for want of proof and it did not impel any secularist to deplore such acquittal and seek re-trial. Mushrooming madrasas in the country indulging in anti-India activities does not worry these secularists but they have the audacity to term the activities of RSS and VHP as anti-nation. For them, religion-based reservation for the Muslims in AMU is not an anti-national act, but the alleged discrimination in relief-distribution to the quake-hit in Bhuj surely perturbs these secularists. 5% reservation for Muslims in A.P. awaiting emulation by Bihar and many other State Governments is another burning example of their secularism. Pampering the Muslims at the cost of the Hindus is an unpardonable sin, which cannot be forgiven by any rational and nationalist Indian. It is nothing but a political gimmickry for appeasement of Muslims to garner their votes, which has rendered the Hindus orphans in their own land. The coming generations of ours are being recklessly thrown to a disadvantageous position. The virtual slavery is inevitable for us.
6. Casteism The casteism, too, has proved a bane for the Hindus. The exploitation of the lower castes at the hands of the privileged ones fomented hatred amongst the denizens of the country and weakened the Hindu race. Further, the Hindus being divided on caste lines in the past, the responsibility to fight and protect the country from foreign invaders was solely put on the Kshatriyas. This gave the others an excuse to shy away from the duty to sacrifice for the country. Whenever there was any attack, it was the Kshatriyas who were to face the brunt. Many a time their short number or non-availability of fighter-Kshatriyas lead to their defeat in wars.
7. Credulousness: The Hindus are credulous by nature. They simply believed what others said without suspecting the ulterior designs of the enemy. There were occasions when the idealist Hindu rulers sincerely honoured a treaty or ceasefire in war but the crook enemy took undue advantage of their credulousness and captured them.
8. Liberalism/Indifferent Attitude: Liberalism, too, has played a destructive role in Hindu religion. The pictures and names of Hindu Gods & Goddesses are freely used as mean trademarks and trade names. Ganesh Bidi, Ganesh Chhaap Khaini, Durga Lottery etc. by the Hindus themselves certainly lowers the respect for Hindu Gods in the mind of others. Taking a cue, the foreign companies dare to print the pictures of Hindu Gods and Goddesses on such mean things as undergarments, shoes and commodes. Would they dare to do the same with the deities of other faiths? Making films on Hindu Gods & Goddesses causes irreparable harm to the faith. Human beings personifying Hindu Gods & Goddesses, picturization of vulgar scenes/songs in temples, showing Hindu Gods & Goddesses smoking in ad films only lowers their respect in the eyes of people.
9. TV serials like Ramayana, Maha Bharata, Jai Hanuman, Sri Krishna etc., where human beings play the divine role for money, encourage commercialisation of the Hindu ecclesiastical domain. Even in Jagrans, the bhaints are based on film tunes that certainly spoils the sanctity. The pictures of Hindu Gods & Goddesses on calendars, in newspapers and magazines being trampled under feet in streets definitely lower the respect in the mind of others. On the contrary, ban on assuming the role of Sikh Gurus or Muslim Prophet maintains reverence. Inviting censure of Sikhs by films like “Sava Lakh Se Ek Ladaoon”, and “Jo Bole So Nihal” are live examples of the concern of the Sikh community for their gurus, which regretfully is missing in the attitude of the Hindus.The beggars wearing masks of Hindu Gods and posing as Gods for begging in bazaars & streets definitely reduces obeisance for the Gods.10. Lack of discipline and non-availability of facilities in temples, inns and places of pilgrimage: Lack of discipline in Hindu temples and places of pilgrimage is also a serious stigma. The managing bodies of the Hindu religious places and the pandas are largely unscrupulous & selfish and are only interested in minting money. The ashrams and dharamshalas are used as enterprises of profit. On the contrary, the ample availability of food, shelter and services in gurudwaras certainly inspires a sense of security & respect in the mind of visitors. This has resulted in the taking over of the management of several Hindu shrines and places of pilgrimage by government. Could any government dare to do the same with a mosque or a gurudwara or a church? Males and females bathing together at places of Hindu pilgrimage or in sacred rivers/ponds become objects of sensuousness only. Lack of conveniences, defecating and defiling the surroundings by the visitors present a nauseating look. On the contrary, strict discipline is observed in gurudwaras, which certainly helps in maintaining reverence for these places.11. Glorification of invaders’ monuments: It is a well known historical fact that the Muslim invaders exercised every atrocity on the native Hindus. They attacked us. They looted wealth, slaughtered innocent people, converted Hindus to Islam at the point of sword. They kidnapped our women and raped them with pride. They broke temples and erected mosques over them. They even decked idols of those temples in the stairs to humiliate Hindus. Famous historian P.N. Oak claims that the so called Muslim monuments in India were originally the Hindu buildings. The Muslim invaders plundered them, captured them, broke them, sacrileged them and converted them into Muslim monuments. The Hindus, instead of considering them a stigma on the national honour take pride in calling them national monuments. Millions of rupees are spent on their maintenance. Some have been given the status of heritage buildings. A community of self honour would never accept such humiliation like this.12. Unhealthy custom of marriage: There are many unhealthy and despicable customs amongst the Hindus. For example, in almost all the southern states of the country and parts of some western states like Maharashtra, Gujrat and Rajsthan, there is permission of a person marrying his niece, like sister’s daughter (bhanji), cousin like maternal uncle’s (mama) or paternal aunt’s (bhooa) daughter. This is marriage within consanguinity. Though marriage within consanguinity is against Hindu marriage Act, but the custom overrides the statutory provisions. This weakens the uniformity of the custom at national level and makes us a subject of ridicule by others. 13. Leaderless community: A common Hindu belongs to leaderless community, as their own (Hindu) leaders are not for them, they are for others. I have seen Sikh leadership fighting collectively on different issues like Delhi riots, turban issue in France, kirpaan issue in Sweden, Santa-Banta (ridiculing cartoons) issue in Mumbai, turban-scanning issue in America. All the Sikh leaders irrespective of their political affiliation fought it collective. Similarly, Prophet Mohammed’s picture (cartoon) in a Danish newspaper attracted protest from Muslims all over the world. Conversely, you can amply see Hindu leaders neutralising efforts of their own brothers doing something for Hindu welfare and blaming of violating secularism. It is nothing but a cheap effort to earn momentary & transient acclaim from others. On the contrary, the leaders of other faiths fighting collective, forgetting their political differences, definitely fetches them tangible results. The above-mentioned points prove that the Hindus are dead race with impotent leaders. They are no better than sheep and goats. They take pride in being driven like cattle by others. The selfish Hindu leaders see nothing beyond their myopic ends. The meek & selfish Hindus are sure to extinct one day.
Deploring earnestly,

A CLEAR EVIDENCE PROVING SWISS BANKING PRIVACY IS NOT JUST CAUSING THREATS TO SOVERINGNITY OF A COUNTRY BUT ALSO CAUSING THREATS TO VERY OBJECT OF EXISTENCE OF UNITED NATIONS ORGANISATION

I have Appealed on behalf of myself as well as other supporting organizations and individuals from around the world, to the world's highest body responsible for Global Governance, through Your Excellency with copies to some of your Excellencies addressed thereto, inter alia with the following demands:
“this problem of International magnitude will not be solved till some sort of stiff actions are taken by the United Nations Organizations, which should be directed towards its Member States that “they cannot maintain any financial or other relationship with Switzerland or any other country, having Banking Privacy for Foreign Citizen. Such directions should be imposed for a period, till these countries do not change their Banking Privacy Laws, to ensure disclosures of the following details before the authorities of respective countries:
a) Total amount of "unclaimed" money in Switzerland from each country;
Total amount of money deposited in Switzerland with names of individuals / organizations, address and country.”
His Excellency President of Swiss Confederation Mr. Samuel Schm, and with copies to some of Excellencies addressed thereto, as APPEAL TO PEOPLE OF SWITZERLAND.

Now I am placing very serious Reports, roaming on in Internet causing either of opposite but, serious impacts against very existence of United Nations Organization.

Reports (as enclosed herein after this representation for all of Excellencies addressed thereto) which are roaming in the internet are relating to the alleged fact that Soviet (the then USSR) intelligence agency KGB had deposited US $2 billion in a Swiss bank account in 1985 in the "minor" account of Rahul Gandhi managed by his mother Sonia Gandhi, which causing serious but complete opposite impacts against democratic, sovereign country of India, and further causing serious threats to objects of very existence of United Nations Organisation, just because Swiss Banking Privacy is prevailing in respect of Foreign Depositors.

If this then it is ample clear that Smt. Sonia Gandhi grabbed the reins of Powers of UPA, (which is controlling the present Government of India headed by Dr. Man Mohan Singh Government), with the help of such money powers from Swiss Banking System. This way Swiss People has caused serious interfere in the internal matter of India through privacy in Swiss Banking System. In such case I can understand the reason for Non-Principled alliance between Communists and Congress to form present Government, and also understand for the reason for denial of justice to me by various Constitutional and other authorities including Hon’ble Supreme Court of India, Central Vigilance Commission, Central Bureau of Investigation, I. B. under Home Ministry, all authorities working under Revenue Secretary of Finance Ministry, and Railway Ministry in respect of my Prayers and complaints against misuse of the powers and abuse of authority by Shri Jyoti Basu under Nexus Between Shri Jyoti Basu himself and Mafia Leader Sanjay Kumar Jhunjhunwala and his associates and relations, since denial to me justice is not a matter of an individual, rather atrocities, torchers, harassments etc, suffered by me and my family members since 1983 are evidence of complete failure of the entire system under political influence of Shri Jyoti Basu.

But at same time if than this has been initiated to commit Character assassination or Political Assassination of an Important Leader of a Big Political Party of a Largest Democracy of the world, sovereign India, Like Smt. Sonia Gandhi.

But both the impacts causing just in opposite directions, were possible only under prevailing privacy in Banking System of Switzerland proving that Banking Privacy in Swiss Banking System is competent to challenge and threaten to very object of existence of United Nations Organisations, at the Gun Point of such Privacy Laws, and can allow to challenge sovereignty of a country like India.

Therefore, in the light of this, His Excellency as well as all of your Excellencies addressed thereto will consider my Appeal and immediately considering seriousness of the matter, pleased to introduce necessary proposal before Next General Assembly of United Nations Organisations for kind consideration of its Member States in their own large interests, and also in the larger interest of Globalisation and further in the interest of Human Being of the World, whose peace may be threatened if Laws like Banking Privacy of Switzerland allowed to continue any further.

TWO BILLION DOLLARS IN RAHUL GANDHI'S ACCOUNT?
From Our Delhi Bureau
NEW DELHI: Schweitzer Illustrierte, a Swiss news magazine, has alleged in an old issue that the Soviet intelligence agency KGB had deposited US $2 billion in a Swiss bank account in 1985 in the "minor" account of Rahul Gandhi managed by his mother Sonia Gandhi.

Janata Party President Dr Subramanian Swamy, who had secured an order from the Delhi High Court to the CBI to investigate alleged receipt of slush money by late former Prime Minister Rajiv Gandhi's family, has cited a November 1991 issue of the Swiss magazine in support of his charge.

In an affidavit filed before the High Court, Dr Swamy has contended that the CBI should have atleast contacted the news magazine to ascertain the facts. Dr Swamy says a proper CBI inquiry would reveal a scandal which will make the Bofors kickbacks pale before it as it involves corruption indulged in by late former Prime Minister Rajiv Gandhi and exposes the slush money received by Congress President Sonia Gandhi.

Dr Swamy has contested the CBI's contention before the High Court last month that the "allegation" that Rahul Gandhi had received benefits from the commercial dealings of an Indian firm in coopertion with the Soviet foreign trade organisations is vague and hence it did not conduct any inquiry.

He has claimed in the affidavit that during his recent visit abroad this year, he had received "reliable information" that then KGB chief Victor Chebrikov had sought, in writing in December 1985, from the Central Committee of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union (CPSU), "authorisation to make payments in US dollars to the family members of Mr Rajiv Gandhi, viz Sonia Gandhi, Rahul Gandhi and Ms Paola Maino, mother of Sonia Gandhi."

He has further claimed that the payments were authorised by CPSU by a resolution CPSU/CC/No 11228/3 dated 20/12/1985 and the same was also endorsed by the USSR Council of Ministers in Directive No 2633/Rs dated 20/12/1985. He also claimed that these payments had been coming since 1971 as the payments received by Sonia Gandhi's family "have been audited in CPSU/CC resolution No 11187/22 OP dated 10/12/1984.

It may be mentioned here that Dr Swamy had filed a writ petition before the Delhi High Court last year claiming that his allegations against Sonia Gandhi and her family members were based on the documents in the KGB archieves. He said the CBI should have obtained a Letter Rogatory to seek the information from the Russian Government instead of rejecting his charges outright. The case is listed for the next hearing on October 28. END

Dhar's book Open Secrets
by opus dei
Posted on June 15, 2005 1:26 AM EST

A retired Indian Police Service officer, Maloy Krishna Dhar, has revealed in his book Open Secrets certain "facts" that otherwise would have remained secret in the files of the Intelligence Bureau, which he served for 29 years. Though some of these incidents have always been talked about at informal gatherings, no one from the IB ever tried to produce it in "black and white". Dhar, in his 519-page book, makes a reference to an alleged plot by Dhirubhai Ambani's Reliance Industries to replace the then Prime Minister, Rajiv Gandhi, with his cousin Arun Nehru. He also gives vivid accounts of Maneka Gandhi's phone being tapped during Indira Gandhi's regime, the love life of BJP leaders Uma Bharti and K.N. Govinda-charya, an encounter with a Delhi policeman who had managed a posting at a coveted police station in central Delhi after spending Rs 5 lakhs for this and the identification of four Union ministers in Indira Gandhi's Cabinet as alleged conduits of the KGB, the intelligence agency of the erstwhile Soviet Union. Although the author doesn't provide any direct evidence to prove his points, he claims to have picked only those incidents which had a direct bearing on him as an IB operative and with which he was involved on official orders from his boss in the IB. A former joint director in the IB, Dhar's book also contains a reference to how Dhirubhai Ambani gained a foothold inside the Indira Gandhi administration through certain bureaucrats. The author also claims in his book that Mr. George Fernandes was rated by the IB as a foreign spy because of his links with Socialist International. "Several surveillance measures were adopted to keep a tag on his activities," Dhar claims in his book. On Maneka Gandhi he says: "The popular perception that Maneka was thrown out of 1, Safdarjung Road is not correct. She had meticulously prepared for the event ... My static watchers and moles inside the Prime Minister's house had noticed Maneka transferring out small baggage items, which allegedly contained cash, from Safdarjung house to her mother's place at Jorbagh ... Soon after Maneka contrived her exit from the Safdarjung residence of Indira Gandhi, I was directed to mount renewed technical and human intelligence operations against Maneka Gandhi and her mother... I was directed to bug the target phone and locate a `safe house' to record the transmitted telephone and room conversations... The assigned task was accomplished without breaking into the premises of Maneka Gandhi." On Dhirubhai Ambani and Arun Nehru he writes: "Rajiv's woes were aggravated by a spate of `scandals' ... Arun Nehru, V.C. Shukla and powerful lobbies that ranged from industrial houses to thirsty and hungry politicians ably assisted him. In fact, certain accounts attributed a plotted coup by the Reliance Industry of Dhirubhai Ambani to replace Rajiv by Arun Nehru. They were indeed close during the days of bonhomie when Arun collected funds for Rajiv's political campaign. Dhirubhai was known to be a kind financier behind many a successful politician in India."
"We know nothing about you." told Mr. P.A. Sangma looking at Sonia Gandhi. Every leader in that room were aware of the fact that the Russian spy agency KGB had deposited US $2 billion (Rs 9400 Crores) in a Swiss bank account in 1985 in the "minor" account of Rahul Gandhi managed by his mother Sonia Gandhi that was reported years back in .Schweitzer Illustrierte, a Swiss news magazine. Is Sonia Gandhi, who called Vajpayee a gaddar (traitor) is the actual traitor? Does Sonia Gandhi alias Maino is a possible KGB and the Vatican secret agency Opus Dei's plant in India.

Sonia had bluffed Parliament in the 'Who is who' record which is part of the Parliament record, wherein it was stated on page 291 that Sonia Gandhi had a diploma in English from Cambridge University. This is false information and Sonia does not have even a high school certificate. This amounts to lying to the Parliament. Sonia had gone to work as a housemaid in the town of Cambridge and was learning English in a teaching shop. Russian Intelligence agencies have planted her in front of Rajiv Gandhi to trap him. The nation has no clue about who Sonia really is. What Sonia was doing between 1963 to 1967 in UK if she was not studying? India has no time to waste to find out the truth of Sonia Gandhi. She has a pedestrian intellect and not a suitable material to head our nation.
Who is Sonia? She is Antonia Maino of Italy and was born to Mrs. Paola Maino, in a small village called Orbassano, near Turin city. Her father was Stephano Maino and was a member of the fascist party. Sonia's parents were poor. Sonia was sent to UK from Italy to work as a housemaid in Cambridge. As her English was poor she used to attend a part time English speaking class at a roadside tutorial. Mrs. Antonia Maino was given the name 'Sonia' by her late mother-in-law, Indira Gandhi. But there is no notification in the gazette regarding this change in name. This change of name runs in Nehru family is to fool the Indian public for their votes. Indira Gandhi was Indira Priyadasini. Indira married as per Islamic rites Feroz Khan after converting herself to Islam. Indira’s muslim name was Maimuna Begum and later both had changed their name to fool the public of India on the advice of Ghandi by an affidavit in a court to Indira Gandhi and Feroz Gandhi. .
Before finding out about Sonia Gandhi, we should see what chilling incident happened in our neighboring Sikkim. In Sikkim a CIA agent Hope Cooke was presented as an American research student to the Sikkim prince and future King Palden Thondup Namgyal, for creating an independent Sikkim. . The then king appointed Ms. Cook as the English language tutor to the crown prince. Ms. Cook conveniently fell in love with her student and this culminated in the Royal wedding. Sikkim. Prince Palden Thondup Namgyal aged 39 married Hope Cooke, 22 in 1963 and conveniently his father Tashi Namgyal, the eleventh chogyal died in the same year. Sikkim used to be a protectorate of India, which had overall responsibility for its defense and foreign relations. Barring this, the territory enjoyed some autonomy under the Chogyal (ruler). The Indian intelligence was aware of CIA plot. Our government in 1975 ended the special status of Sikkim and Cook along with chogyal emigrated to US. Sonia could be the KGB or the Pope’s Opus Dei’s answer in India to what CIA did in Sikkim.

Russian spy agency KGB’s deposit of US $2 billion (Rs 9400 Crores) in a Swiss bank account in 1985 in the "minor" account of Rahul Gandhi managed by his mother Sonia Gandhi as was reported years back in .Schweitzer Illustrierte, a Swiss news magazine was not for free. Antonia Maino alias Sonia Gandhi has to payback for such an investment. Is this the amount Russians paid for buying India? . It is no wonder that Mushareef is asking for the mediation of Kashmir issue by Sonia Gandhi. Sonia was Antonia Maino and was born in1944 in Luciana in Italy as per her birth certificate submitted to our Government. Strangely her official father Stefano Maino a mason, a fascist, and a Nazi army volunteer was a prisoner-of-war in Russia continuously from 1942 to 1945. At the time of Sonia’s marriage to Rajeev the papers had even reported that both were of the same age. So a new birth date of 1946 was created and the place of birth became Orbassano in Italy and the name became Sonia which is uncommon in Italy. In 1966 she was working in London for an ISI operative Salman Thassir. Sonia’s link to KGB is also reported in the press. When Manmohan Singh's government taken office, Russia called back its career diplomat Ambassador in New Delhi and posted as the new Ambassador a person who was the KGB station chief in New Delhi during the 1970s. So it may not be surprising that recently we made urgent payment to Russia that was widely reported, even though the prices are not negotiated or finalized. Facts are stranger than fiction. The revelations by the principal Swedish Bofors case investigator Sten Lindstrom on the pressure from the congress government in India that resulted in the misdirection and closing down of the Bofors investigation is really stunning information that points the finger at Rajiv and Sonia. The pressure from India also led to the Swedish National Audit Bureau sending a blanked out version of its inquiry to India. When a team of senior executives from Bofors traveled to India to testify before the Joint Parliamentary Committee, they were prevented from doing so. Instead they met a small group of officials to whom they did not hand over any names He says that Ottavio Quattrocchi, the Italian middleman who negotiated the political payoff through A E Services, and who was paid $7,123,000 as a gift must be interrogated along with Sonia Gandhi . 320 million Swedish kronor had been paid as bribe for the Bofors deal to the Hindujas and Win Chadha. Win Chadha used to get faxes in Dubai on cabinet decisions on Bofors from the office of Rajiv Gandhi when Rajiv was the prime minister. I still remember the day Rajiv Gandhi visited the Dubai businessman Chabria at his office in the Jumbo house in Bur Dubai in the night like a thief when Chabria was wanted by the Indian police and it was a real shocker for me. I would not have believed it had I not seen the incident. Only time will tell as to what was the reason for that secret and clandestine meeting in Dubai. Italian government has approached our government in October 2003 with a request to drop the case against Quattrocchi which means that the Sonia marrying Rajiv is not a simple boy meets the girl thing, but could be a planned operation by the Vatican.
If Sonia becomes the PM of India the havoc that will visit us is incalculable. Everything about our national security, defense, scientific and technological progress by BARC, ISRO, DRDO, ICAR, ICMR, our trade policies will be an open book to Russia, Rome and even to the Muslim nations. The Italian mafia will take over Indian institutions and businesses. The consequences are very dreadful and macabre to imagine as our nations will be taken over through the backdoor. In 1996 George Fernandez moved a resolution in the parliament which says that a person who is not an Indian by birth should not be allowed to hold high offices. Sonia never forgot this incident. Subsequently foreign funds came for the establishment of Tehelka, a website whose CEO was a nephew of Arjun Singh of Congress. The chief of Zee TV is close to Congress. Tehelka went into elaborate deception to discredit the Defense department of corruption. They showed senior politicians, bureaucrats and army officials apparently taking bribes from journalists posing as arms dealers. Tehelka.com's sponsor Zee TV prominently featured the story, sensationalizing it in the bargain. As far as the contents of the Tehelka tapes are concerned, they are worth nothing. The 'evidence' of the tapes would be thrown of any court in five minutes. Even worse, they would not be admissible even in an FIR (first information report), without which there cannot be an investigation. To begin with, the 'evidence' was obtained illegally. Even the police need a court order to tape secretly. When the tapes were shown on TV, most people could not make head or tail of the comments provided by the broadcaster. Parliament was paralyzed for days by the opposition.
Possible involvement of ISI, KGB, Opus Dei
1. During Nehru's time Indira Gandhi might have been on the payroll of KGB. Later as per U.S. Congressional hearing records Indira Gandhi's family most likely Rajiv and Sonia, were on the payroll of the Pakistani Banker the late Agha Hassan Abedi, who founded the Bank known as Bank of Credit and Commerce International (BCCI). BCCI was a drug money laundering outfit finally owned by the ruler of Abu Dhabi, Sheikh Zyed. Mr. Manmohan Singh when he was the governor of Reserve Bank of India was advised by RAW not to issue license for opening the ISI bank BCCI in Bombay as BCCI was funding spying in India and was also funding the Pakistani nuclear programme. Yet Manmohan simply approved it. BCCI was used even by Reliance for its hawala transactions. (BCCI had grown as a result of it running a supply centre for ‘Pakistani minor girls’ to Sheikh Zyed and other leading Sheikhs in the Gulf. Naturally Sheikh became the leading share holder of BCCI. These details are available in the US senate reports.) The BCCI also known as the cocaine bank collapsed with a loss of $ 16 billion. All that Manmohan got was a scholarship for his daughter, but his main benefit turned out to be that the congress party immediately inducted him to the party. Many details are available in our parliamentary proceedings when the collapse of the BCCI was discussed. Sonia had connections to the Vatican Bank which was active in Europe and America drug market where as BCCI specialized in the Asian drug market. Abedi's reach extended to the U.S. also. He even had the former Secretary of Defense Clark Clifford as his lobbyist for a fee of nearly $100 million. All this was exposed in U.S. Congressional hearings.
2. KGB might have murdered Indian Prime Minister Lal Bahadur Sastri, in Tashkent, by poisoning so that Nehru family can come back to power. Following the India-Pakistan War of 1965, Shastri met in Tashkent with President Ayub Khan of Pakistan and signed a “no-war” declaration. He died the next day Jan 11, 1966. The story put out by KGB that a Muslim cook with Lal Bahadur Sastri's entourage had poisoned him in Tashkent and escaped to Pakistan may be a cover-up for what KGB had done.
3. Sonia Gandhi was groomed and presented in front of Rajiv Gandhi by KGB, to hook Rajiv which was successful. Subsequently Rajiv marries Sonia.
4. KGB may be involved in the plane accident of Sanjiv Gandhi and might be pure murder to eliminate Sanjiv and to bring in Rajiv as the successor to Indira Gandhi. This paved the way for Rajiv Gandhi to become PM, who is married to KGB agent Sonia.
5. Rajiv Gandhi was killed by the Sri Lankan terrorist group LTTE which is totally supported and financed by christian organizations abroad. Rajiv Gandhi was blown up in Tamil Nadu on May 21, 1991 by a Roman Catholic female suicide bomber Dhanu, 24, whose real name was Kalaivathi. Once Rajiv was killed the external spy agencies might have worked behind the scenes to promote Sonia Gandhi. Potential threats to Sonia’s leadership were one by one eliminated in excellently planned natural accidents which are a KGB specialty. All the deaths of potential future contenders of congress presidency were killed in accidents on Sundays. Sunday murders are a specialty of Christians and this is well proven in India's North Eastern states where the Christian terrorists murder Hindus mostly on Sundays. Muslims generally carryout terrorist killing of Hindus on Fridays. Rajesh Pilot died in a road accident on Sunday, Jitendra Prasada died of brain hemorrhage on Sunday and Madhava Scindia was killed in a place crash on Sunday. Kamal Nath, another prominent young Congress leader narrowly escaped when a small plane he was traveling in crashed, killing some others on board. On Sunday 30th September. 2001 Madhavrao Scindia who was deputy leader of the Congress in the Lok Sabha and one of its senior-most members, and who was also one of the boyfriend of Sonia in London, was killed along with seven others. They were charred beyond recognition in a plane crash. Seventeen minutes before the plane was due to land in Kanpur, the Air Traffic Control in the city lost contact with it. The plane caught fire in mid-air and became a ball of fire by the time it hit the ground. Mystery shrouds the circumstances under which the aircraft crashed near Motta village in Mainpuri district. The Beechcraft C-90 aircraft used by Mr. Scindia belonged to Jindal Strips and was maintained by India International Aviation Ltd. In June 2000 the senior Congress leader Rajesh Pilot met with the fatal accident in the highway on a stretch between Jaipur and Dausa.

On the KGB connection, Dhar writes: "My painstaking research and intelligence penetration had succeeded in identifying four Union ministers (of Indira Gandhi's Cabinet) and over two dozen MPs who were on the payrolls of KGB operatives. Some of them are still around... But the most surprising area of penetration of the KGB was the ministry of defense and those layers of the Armed Forces which were responsible for procurement of military hardware. My list of these galactic stars did not amuse my bosses and I was advised to `secure that information' (sic) in my archive. No one at the top had the gumption of illuminating the government with the identity of the Soviet targets... The most interesting case was that of a member of Parliament who regularly received a pay packet from the Soviet embassy for covering certain segments of the kitchen cabinet of Indira Gandhi."

A bizarre turn of events, Karasik & Associates, attorneys for Indian National Overseas Congress, a subsidiary of Indian National Congress, headed by Sonia Gandhi, in INOC v. Kataria, et al. served a Notice of Discontinuance in the above-named action to Justice Emly Jane Goodman of the Supreme Court of New York on September 29, 2008. The Notice of Discontinuance tantamount to an unconditional surrender by the Congress Party and could be construed as a victory of Dharmic forces. In actuality, the hearing in this case, originally, was scheduled to be held October 2, 2008. The prominent Law Firm of Kornstein, Veisz, Wexler & Pollard represented Narain Kataria, Arish Sahani and Indo Caribbean Council. The stipulation between the attorneys of the two parties was agreed to, signed and stamped in the Court on October 2, 2008. Prior to this last month a similar case filed by INOC in New Jersey Court against Sunanda Thali, Satyanarayana Dosapati, Naresh Sharma, and Mahatma Gandhi International Foundation, Inc., was summarily dismissed by the Judge who found that the Plaintiff had no locus standi in filing such a frivolous case. It is a matter of great happiness for all NRIs, particularly Hindus, that the famous adage from Vedic literature Satya Mev Jayate (Truth shall always prevail, once again, prevailed in New York and New Jersey Courts, on the Birthday of Mahatma Gandhi! In this connection, it should be noted that the INOC had filed these two lawsuits on the alleged grounds that Kataria, Sahani et al had defamed President of Indian National Congress, Sonia Gandhi, by bringing out a full page advertisements in The New York Times, dated October 6, 2007. Some extracts from that advertisement are as follows: “UN’s declaration of Mahatma Gandhi’s birthday on October 2nd as the International Non-Violence Day is commendable. However, instead of a true Gandhian delivering his message of peace and non-violence, Sonia Gandhi who is not a representative of Gandhian values is chosen. “Sonia Maino Gandhi is NOT related to Mahatma Gandhi. She is attempting to misappropriate his name for political mileage and international legitimacy. “Sonia is known to be vindictive and undemocratic. Her party uses various mechanisms, such as tax raids, direct threats to subjugate opposition. “Due to her party’s pro-terrorist policies, India has second highest number of terrorism victims after Iraq. Her Government is requesting clemency to Afzal Guru, the mastermind of attack on Indian Parliament. In pursuit of Muslim vote bank, she has created soft borders and turned a blind eye towards Islamic fundamentalism. “Her husband Rajiv Gandhi is alleged to have received payments from KGB. According to Schweizer, Illustrierte, Rajiv has a secret Swiss Bank account of 2 billion dollars. Her son Rahul projected as next Prime Minister of India, was detained by FBI with large unaccounted cash at Boston Airport in 2001. (Swiss magazine Schweizer, Illustrierte 11/1991, Indo Asian News Service). “Her party was involved in the UN Oil for Food Scam that helped Saddam Hussain. She was involved in numerous scams, scandals and controversies. Before entering India, she was an au-pair with modest means. Since then, she and her family members have amassed millions through questionable means. (Know Your Sonia by India First Foundation) The purpose of these cases, it is believed, was to silence the voice of the critics of Sonia Gandhi through her surrogates, stifle the voice of freedom, make defendants financially bankrupt, frighten them into submission, and suppress the truth. It is also worthwhile to mention here that these two cases had generated an inquisitive interest in media, a sense of unity and brotherhood among Indian Diaspora, particularly Hindus and Sikhs, who had organized fund raisers and established Hindu Support Fund to defray attorneys’ fees and other related expenses to be incurred in these cases. It is a matter of great satisfaction and joy that the Right of Free Speech guaranteed under the First Amendment of American Constitution has been upheld by the judges and the sinister designs of enemies of freedom of speech, actuated by the malicious desire to muzzle the voice of free speech, truth, and vilify the defendants, have been nipped in the bud. . `From the time Sonia entered India, she has looted the country on a large scale’. INOC have objected to this statement. Sonia Gandhi’s acts of Himalayan corruption have been graphically brought out by Dr. Subramanian Swamy in his website under the title `Know your Sonia’. If Dr. Swamy’s allegations were false, Sonia could have easily issued a legal notice regarding her defamation to Dr. Swamy in the same way in which INOC Inc. have issued to Narain Kataria and Arish Sahani. I propose to deal with this aspect in a detailed and documented manner with reference to the available information regarding several deeds and misdeeds of corruption of Sonia Gandhi and her family. The mass media in India — I mean the pseudo-secular mafia (not very different from Italian mafia!) of mass media in India _will black out all news relating to the political exposures of the known murky deeds of Sonia Gandhi by her political opponents. The daily tone for this type of prejudiced, lopsided and even criminal approach to news reporting and dissemination of information is set by our own surrogate Prime Minister who never loses an opportunity to extol Sonia Gandhi as `the tallest leader in our Country’. The time tested and proven bulletproof armor of every ambitious Congressman lies in open flattery and sycophancy. Nothing in the Sonia Congress Party succeeds like excess _excess of servility laced with excessive flattery and sycophancy. That is the only acid test of your `official’ performance as a Cabinet Minister. This gets proved by the reported fact that one of the disgusting and crawling Cabinet Ministers in the UPA Government described Sonia Gandhi as `a rare combination of Jesus Christ, Gautama Buddha and Mahatma Gandhi’. In order to understand the political issue of super-corruption of Sonia Gandhi, it is very necessary to go into the issue of the known public fraud of the story of her citizenship from 1968 till April 29, 1983. Sonia married Rajiv Gandhi in 1968 but she retained her Italian citizenship till April 29, 1983, even though she could have applied for Indian citizenship in 1968 itself. Her continuance in India and her being part of Indira Gandhi’s household, as a foreign national from 1968 to April 29, 1983 was kept as a closely guarded political secret. The pseudo-secular mafia of mass media extended its full cooperation to this subterranean, nationally subversive plot from 1968 to April 29, 1983. It was `The Pioneer’ newspaper in Delhi, which put an end to the prevailing confusion regarding the shady citizenship status of Sonia Gandhi in May 1999 when it published details about the grant of Indian citizenship to her. After living in India as a foreign national (owing no allegiance whatsoever to the Indian State or the Indian Constitution) she applied for Indian citizenship on April 7, 1983 —15 years after her marriage to Rajiv Gandhi. She was granted Indian citizenship on April 30, 1983. Thus Sonia Gandhi proved that the Indian Citizenship Act is vulnerable and that she is invulnerable! To quote the brilliant words of A. Surya Prakash, Editor of a landmark book titled `Sonia under Scrutiny, Issue of Foreign Origin’: `Once it was public knowledge that she preferred to retain Italian citizenship for long years after her marriage, even though she was the daughter-in-law of India’s Prime Minister and lived in the Official residence of the Prime Minister, she began indulging in a bit of obfuscation. She has been saying that she accepted Indian citizenship the day she became Indira Gandhi’s bahu and that applying for citizenship was a `mere technicality’. All Italy-bound Indians must test Sonia’s theory of citizenship at the touchstone of Italian immigration! It is difficult to find another naturalized citizen who indulges in such dishonesty, but then let us not forget, that is `the stuff’ she is made of’. Thus Sonia clung to her Italian citizenship for 15 years after her marriage but strangely enough, she was able to get voting rights in India long before April 30, 1983! Just as she created a world record relating to her Cambridge University Qualifications, she also created a record by smuggling herself into the voters’ list in New Delhi in January 1980, using the high authority of the Prime Ministers’ [Indira Gandhi's] household which ran the office of the Prime Minister and indeed the whole of government of India those days! The name of Sanjay Gandhi, who died in a plane crash in June 1980, was deleted from the voters’ list when the Electoral Rolls were revised in 1981, but Sonia Gandhi’s name remained at No.388 in Polling Station 145 of New Delhi Parliamentary Constituency. The point to be noted is that, Sonia was an Italian citizen and not an Indian Citizen. K.L.Sethi, the then Election Officer in Delhi, deleted her name, only after the eruption of a controversy in 1982. The fraudulent entry of Sonia at that time would have gone unnoticed but for Surya India, a news magazine edited by her estranged sister-in-law Menaka Gandhi, who raked up the issue. Her magazine did a cover story on Sonia Gandhi in October 1982, and asked how a citizen of Italy could be a voter in India. An official in Delhi’s Chief Electoral Office had told the `Surya India’ magazine at that time that it was a blatant violation of the Electoral Rules, but had pleaded his helplessness. That magazine also quoted him saying, `It is not for us to check whether applicant’s are bona fide citizens of this country. We expect only genuine citizens to enroll themselves. Besides, who can expect an official to question the veracity of statements made by a responsible member of the Prime Minister’s family when they go to crosscheck the Voters’ List?’ Even after this public exposure of electoral fraud, Sonia Gandhi re-entered the Voters’ List following a fresh revision in 1983. She was listed at Serial No.236 in Polling Station 140 of the New Delhi Parliamentary Constituency. It has been reported that she had not become an Indian citizen even at that time. She applied for Indian Citizenship on April 7, 1983 and was granted the same on April 30, 1983 _in a matter of 23 days. Thus her re-entry into the Electoral Rolls of 1983 was also dubious because the qualifying date for entry into the Electoral Rolls was January 1 of 1983 and on that day Sonia Gandhi was a citizen of Italy. Sonia Gandhi has therefore shown little respect for Indian Laws during her stay in India as a foreign national from 1968 and this gives us a sublime (as distinct from the `Staleness Doctrine’ of the Supreme Court of India!) glimpse of `the stuff’ she his made of. According to the Representation of People Act, only Indian Citizens can be voters (unless she happens to be a Sonia!). Even according to our Supreme Court, perhaps, this type of rule of law (totally stale!) is just not applicable to Sonia Gandhi and her family who are accorded a `sublime’ status above the Law of the Constitution. In a classic article has completely brought to the public view the lurid story relating to the Himalayan folly, fraud, force and farce of Sonia’s corruption.

IF NOT ISLAM, THEN WHAT? a world without Islam—admittedly an almost inconceivable state of affairs given its charged centrality in our daily news headlines. Islam seems to lie behind a broad range of international disorders: suicide attacks, car bombings, military occupations, resistance struggles, riots, fatwas, jihads, guerrilla warfare, threatening videos, and 9/11 itself. Why are these things taking place? “Islam” seems to offer an instant and uncomplicated analytical touchstone, enabling us to make sense of today’s convulsive world. Indeed, for some neoconservatives, “Islam fascism” is now our sworn foe in a looming “World War III.”But indulge me for a moment. What if there were no such thing as Islam? What if there had never been a Prophet Mohammed, no saga of the spread of Islam across vast parts of the Middle East, Asia, and Africa? Given our intense current focus on terrorism, war, and rampant anti-Americanism—some of the most emotional international issues of the day—it’s vital to understand the true sources of these crises. Is Islam, in fact, the source of the problem, or does it tend to lie with other less obvious and deeper factors? For the sake of argument, in an act of historical imagination, picture a Middle East in which Islam had never appeared. Would we then be spared many of the current challenges before us? Would the Middle East be more peaceful? How different might the character of East-West relations be? Without Islam, surely the international order would present a very different picture than it does today. Or would it?

A TRIBUTE TO SRI P.N. OAK

This Letter was written before he passed away on 4th December, 2007.
Mr. P.N. Oak. Austere by nature, a journalist by profession, a historian by hobby a researcher by accident and a freedom fighter by design Mr. Oak is one of his kind.
Born on March 2, 1917 at Indore (Cntral India) in a Maharashtrian Brahmin family he obtained his M.A. LLB Degrees from Mumbai University worked as a tutor in English at Fergussan College, Pune for a year and later joined the army got posted to Singapore at the age of 24.
He was one of the organizers of Indian national Army (INA) and a co-worker of Netaji Subhas Chandra Bose. After the end of world war II Oak walked back and hitch niped from Singapore to Dimapur in Assam.
From 1947 to 1974 his profession has been mainly journalism having worked on the editorial staff of Hindustan Times and The Statesman, as a class I officer in the Ministry of Information an Broadcasting (Govt. of India) and as Editor in American Embassy’s information service (USIS), all in New Delhi.
From 1963 onwards Mr. Oak has been putting out copious evidence through his research papers articles lectures slide chans and books proving that the historic mansions gardens, mosques, towers mansoleums and town ships ascribed to Moslems in India are in reality pre-moslem property belonging to and built by Hindu rulers.
Because of his hobby of visiting historic edifices it struck him as very odd that though muslims ruled India for over a thousand years ( 712 to 1857 A.D.) they are said to have raised mostly tombs and mosques, but no palaces. The other oddity in current history is that even native Indian ( Hindu) rulers for 7000 years from Pandavas to Prithviraj Chauhan are not known to have had many palaces of their own.
After years of concentrated thinking on those two enigmas it suddenly struck him that historic edifices throughout India tamtommed as tambs and mosques, could be captured, misused and misadvertised palaces and temples raised by Hindu rulers.
That inducd him to investigate further collect evidence and take a second harder look at historic edifices through out India which convinced him that his hypothesis was correct.
Thus, since he had discovered a great blunder in Indian history he wondered whether world history was faultless. And to his shock and surprise he discovered that world history too has numerous drawbacks.
For instance though there was no Islam before 622 A.D. none of the muslim countries throughout the world teaches any pre Islamic history of its region. Likewise no Christian country throughout the world teaches any pre-christian history.
These discoveries nudged him to found an organization which would teach the world of its (Pre-islamic and pre-christian) vedic Sanskrit heritage which held full sway throughout the world. He wrote several books braving the displeasure of his employers and the ruling Govt.
Charges of being communal were hurled at him. His books were banned from the library of parliament persecuted and prosecuted OAK faught his own case and was pronounced ‘not gulty’ by the court of law.
Supported by his family and friends he went ahead and founded the Institute for Rewriting Indian History which further grew to be The Institute for Rewriting world history.
Mr. OAK was invited for felicitation and lectures by various (N.G.O.) institutions and individuals. He traveled all over India and abroad and evoked great care from his readers and followers.
All his discoveries have so far remained unchallenged.