Naik

Nr[z] vs FFI Staff

Submitted by admin on Sat, 10/24/2009 - 12:39

From: NaR[z] . To: faithfreedom2@gmail.com Date: Apr 19, 2006 6:47 PM Subject: fao: ali sina Why hello there i stumbled across your website, while searching for some Dr zakir naik information, anyway i saw your little invitation to dr zakir naik. Why are you mentioning that your site is ranked

Lyes L. Thanks the FFI Staff

Submitted by admin on Sat, 10/24/2009 - 12:38

From: Leys Louali TO: ffi Jun 28, 2006 8:55 AM subject: your challenge for $50,000 Dear Sina, I had the chance to look at the various questions you addressed Mr Naik with and was really amazed to notice that you are challenging whoever can prove you wrong with $ 50,000 and at the same time you cannot afford a $ 90.00 book to prove that Mr. Naik is wrong in his interpretation on mountain formation.

Debating with Muslims

Submitted by admin on Sat, 10/24/2009 - 12:38

[color=maroon]Hi Mr Sina I feel nice to see your personal response......You wrote about Dr Shabbir: "What he has done is nothing new. He has tried to twist the words to make the Qur'an look less violent and more appealing. This is basically what all other translators have done"

Muhammad is not predicted in Hindu scriptures - Part 5

Submitted by admin on Mon, 09/28/2009 - 09:15

They then give their version of the mantras 1 through 13 of the Kuntap Sukt which according to them is amassed from some Hindu Pundits. However the work of Griffith and Whitney are usually considered sufficient :