A March of Stupidity


What a tumultuous new year it has been.  The election of Donald J. Trump to the presidency of the United States of America has been met with anything but peace and conciliation.  Since Trump’s victory back in November, massive rallies, calls for impeachment, violence and just about everything else you can imagine immediately ensued.  In the first two weeks since the inauguration of the 45th president of the United States, we have been confronted with a storm of executive orders on a range of politically divisive issues: free trade, economic regulations, national security, immigration and a host of other important items.  Interestingly enough though, the left-wing community, after remaining silent for years as Obama abused his executive powers, suddenly discovered their inner libertarian on civil liberties. Out of nowhere executive orders became tyrannical; quoting the constitution was trendy again; those Founding Fathers who were mere background noise as our 2nd and 10th amendment rights were being trampled on for years suddenly became cultural superstars on January 20, 2017 .  There were even ramblings about a possible secession from the union.

Of course, this has all just been manufactured outrage toward a presidency effectively handicapped from doing anything legally outrageous just yet.  The rabble-rousers are not furious at what Trump has done, but at what they think he thinks he plans on doing in the future.  Even the list of nations targeted by the so-called “Muslim ban” were already pre-selected by the Obama administration and therefore does not reveal anything as constitutionally upsetting as progressives would have you believe.  In fact, the Obama administration dropped 26,000 bombs on seven Muslim nations just last year.  In many ways, Trump is following the footsteps of his predecessor, albeit being more direct and upfront about it.

So what’s all the fuss about? Well, the so-called Women’s March on Washington gave us a nice microscopic analysis of what the collective outrage is all about.  And by that, I mean absolutely nothing.  This has been one tiring characteristic of the infuriated left: battling those mythical dragons that continue to haunt them.  One may even call it circular outrage: protesting for the sake of protesting for the sake of protesting.  Because, when you press them about it, these “antifascists” fail to articulate what particularly inflames them about Trump’s “war on women”.  Roe v. Wade still stands unscathed.  Affirmative action for women still, by and large, remains in-tact.  The teaching modules that have flooded the academies since reactionary feminism took off still propagate the fatuous theory of gender creationism: that gender, much like the categories and structures done away with by 19th century continental philosophy, is nothing more than an illusion.  So what exactly are these crusaders wailing about?

As if all of this is not unintelligible enough, we then encounter some moral difficulties with the chosen narrators of the progressive cause. For starters, meet one Linda Sarsour: a young, American, Muslim “feminist” and “civil rights” activist, and darling of the cultural left.  In other words, a guilty white liberal’s wet dream.  The relevance of Mrs. Sarsour will become evident in a moment.

Sarsour was honored the “champion of change” by the Obama administration- it doesn’t get sweeter than that.  She is also executive director of the Arab American Association of New York.  And if you’re not drooling yet, just get a load of this: Sarsour even believes in standing up for minorities because thats what her faith teaches her to do– well, unless those minorities are moaning, whining victims of acid attacks and female genital mutilation.  In that case, she just might be annoyed with your Islamophobically ulterior motives.  In fact, Sarsour voiced her opposition to the release of a feminist documentary titled Honor Diaries, a project initiated to expose and disseminate the horrific ordeal many Muslim women have had to endure at the hands of real, entitled male psychopaths- a demographic you think would upset our resident “Muslim feminist”.  After all, here was a golden opportunity for Muslims and non-Muslims to collaborate on supporting actual refugees of misogyny and violence, while clearing the air about the “true Islam” of “equality” and “women rights”.  Sounds sensible enough. Well, Linda Sarsour, along with her scheming cohorts at the Council for American Islamic Relations (CAIR), had a different perspective: mutilating and torturing women is bad,  but mentioning it is even worse.  Forget that, FOX News just hates Muslims.

Mrs. “champion of change” even once went so far as to callously humor that Ayan Hirsi Ali, a producer of the film, ought to have her “vagina removed”- a woman who, ironically enough, actually experienced having bits and pieces of her genitals scraped off as a young girl in Africa.  Right on! If you ask me, this pro-Sharia  civil rights activist is just too misunderstood.

Anyhow, following these intimidations, some universities were pressured into shutting down Honor Diaries.  Apparently, the true, tolerant Islam works in painfully mysterious ways. In an age where even joking about “pussy grabbing” can get you into the deep, surely insulting victims of FGM ought to upset the sensitivity-mongers.

So naturally, feminists swiftly responded to these cruel offenses against female honor victims, as any noble, concerned member of the international sisterhood would: by inviting Sarsour to organize the Women’s March.  How about that?  You see, the organizers were quick to bar those other backward, uneducated, pro-life hordes from infecting their righteous march.  Well who could blame them. These Gloria Steinem action figures just won’t put up with your false gender pronouns and male theories of human nature, or any other such devices that threaten the very essence of their womanhood.  So when they talk woman power, they mean business.  But religious theocrats silencing survivors of the most violent and monstrous variety of misogyny known to the 21st century? Well, we could always add an extra color to that rainbow of diversity!

Thought experiment: imagine if a secular organization collaborated with someone who tried censoring a film about pedophilia in the Catholic Church.  Or even worse: if that same theocrat jokingly remarked that one of the damaged victims should have his “private parts handled” or “cared for” by the priests.  How do you think such a vulgar statement would go down with feminists and secularists? I mean, a Nobel laureate was ruined because a joke he told about office romances didn’t sit well with feminists; but a boastful theocrat, who mocked and vilified victims of FGM successfully landed herself an organizational gig at a Women’s March.  This is the pervasive masochism cancerously swallowing the organ of western feminism.  One must notice its moral stench when these gender activists willingly submit to the very forces of tyranny and oppression, which they have sworn to oppose in the first place.

By embracing the insidious Islamists, the Women’s March officially vetoed itself right out of any future discussion about women’s liberation. Preaching gender equality is more than just a bloody hashtag.  It actually requires committing to a set of internally consistent moral principles, regardless of race or religion.  Abandoning the victims and survivors of a culture that wants to reduce them to slavery and servitude is perhaps not the best way of upholding those principles .  With a few noted exceptions, Trump’s policies do not keep me up at night.  Instead, I am more concerned with the enemies within our midst, the wolf in sheep’s clothing.  The cowards who pit themselves against the oppressed, while advertising for their welfare at the same time, are worthy of humor at best and deserving of our contempt at worst. The useful idiots of the Women’s March should issue an apology to the disgraced sisters of Honor Diaries, and all female victims who’ve ever suffered at the mercy of entitled religious psychopaths.

Certainly Doubtful

5 Responses

  1. Walter Sieruk says:

    Those dangerous, violent and rioting Muslims who engage in all that awful mayhem in Sweden have ,by their own willful behavior ,proven President Trump to be right ,wise and knowledgeable in what he said. Furthermore, of such awful lawless actions of the rioting Muslims in Sweden serves as not only an example of Muslim ungratefulness and unthankfulness for letting them enter Sweden to live. This this further r exposes the Muslim’s Islamic contempt for people who are Westerners and Western civilization, Western laws.
    This Muslim violence may be yet better explained by one of the fables of Aesop which is entitled THE FARMER AND THE VIPER. So here it is “Once in ancient Greece there was a farmer outside on a very cold winter day walking in if field to make sure that everything is in order and as it should be. The farmer came upon a half-froze viper about to die from the bitter cold. The kind yet foolish farmer took pity on the viper and in an action of kindness put it his is vest jacket to warms and up and thus save its life. The viper warned up revived and then bit farmer through the vest jacket. So the kind but foolish farmer died a slow painful death in awful agony because he felt sorry of the viper and saved it life. The point to this fable is the no amount of kindness will change and vicious and evil nature.
    So it is with those Muslim migrants who were allowed to enter Sweden to live . Those violent migrants who are Muslims will not be impress and change because kindness of Westerners. This is because those violent Muslims have that ungrateful dangerous viper nature because of their venomous and violent religion which is Islam.

  2. Face_The_Truth says:

    [] After all, here was a golden opportunity for Muslims and non-Muslims to collaborate on supporting actual refugees of misogyny and violence, while clearing the air about the “true Islam” of “equality” and “women rights”. []

    ‘After a liberal feminist joined the Open Borders Organization “Refugees Welcome,” she decided to prove that multiculturalism works by taking in a refugee.

    However, shortly after welcoming the migrant into her home, she was slapped with a brutal dose of reality that she’ll never forget.

    Local media reported that the liberal millennial awoke one night to find the refugee raping her!

    After several minutes of the sexual assault (i.e., forced Islamic sexual-intercourse by Muslim males with infidel females), she managed to break free and run to her brother’s room until police arrived and arrested the migrant.’



  3. stanley says:

    Karl Marx was an asshole who did not work a day in his life…. allowed his kids to die of starvation, taking from the rich to give to the poor never resolves the root of economic problems. One must be an idiot to be a communist in the modern world- after its failure in mother Russia and elsewhere….communism just an excuse for a few to attain power and rule with iron fist over the majority.

  4. Face_The_Truth says:

    Excellent and extremely well-written arguments made against Palestinian-American political activist Linda Sarsour!

  5. Walter Sieruk says:

    That all the jihadists , anarchists, socialists and Marxists strongly hate President Trump with a passion does reflect the Donald Trump must be an all American patriot who is the right man to be President of the United State of America. By the reason that anyone with any common sense will understand that the actual character of a man may be seen by not only who his friends are but also who his enemies are.
    For example, on January 20 on television evening news I saw one group of anti-Trump protesters marching on the street in Washington DC. They were carrying and holding along banner which had Communist Hammer and Sickle on it. These further shows just how ignorant and outdated many of those anti-Trump people are.
    For Karl Marx with his COMMUNIST MANIFESTO an long with his three volume THE CAPITAL in which he explained his economic political/philosophical scheme for a “classless and stateless society “ in which “Everyone works according his ability and receives according to his needs.’’ has many times over by refuted and discredited by genuine economists, sociologists and historians. These scholars have thoroughly exposes the many economic fallacies and flaws of Marxism way before the collapse of Communism in Russia and the Eastern bloc nations. In 1992. Therefore even the recent history of the early 1990’s disproves Marxism as extremely erroneous. So it’s Adam Smith with his THE WEALTH OF NATIONS that is valid and in contrast Karl Marx with his written nonsensical a full of folly and invalid.
    So in conclusion this exposes how those anti-Trump protesters, just described above , with their Communist pipe -dreams [Marxist fantasy] are people who don’t even have a good grip of the reality of things.

Leave a Reply

%d bloggers like this: