Nadir Ahmed:
How to put to shame the shameless?
By Ali Sina
2005/08/27
Nadir Ahmed is the name of a Muslim cyber idiot, a lunatic
nutcase with no scholarly background. Nadir Ahmed's knowledge of Islam is zilch and his
understanding of logic rates even lower. This pretender aspires to become famous
by trying to debate with famous personalities with critical views about Islam. He challenges
respectable scholars like Dr. Murray, Sam Shamoun, Robert Spencer to debate with
him and while he is defeated logically, Nadir Ahmed insults his opponents until they
realize he is just a loony and leave him. Then he edits those debates and
publishes them in his site claiming victory.
Nadir Ahmed is not even worth consideration. But
I think I must write a word or two about him to put him to shame. Of course to
feel shame he must have some wits and I am afraid Nadir Ahmed lacks that. The reason I
decided to write about this character is because when I made a Google search on my name, I
found his site coming up quite high, and that is because he repeats my name in
that page so many times. The title is: Ali
Sina on the run and there
he claims that he had a debate with me and I am afraid of publishing it.
Yes Nadir Ahmed had a debate with the members of FFI in our forum
where he was logically defeated and humiliated. Soon after that, our site was
hacked and when we uploaded the backup, we lost about three months of the
debates including the one we had with Nadir Ahmed. He then claimed I hacked the site on
purpose because I was afraid of showing our debate with him. For Nadir Ahmed's bad luck,
one member of the forum had a backup of the debate and I published the entire
debate with this character in the debates page.
Here it is. http://www.faithfreedom.org/debates/NadirAhmed.htm
I
Unlike what Nadir Ahmed has in his site, this debate is uncensored
and unedited. He was informed that the debate is published. But like a liar that
he is, Nadir Ahmed keeps saying that I have not published the debate and beats his chest
claiming victory. Even that edited version that he has in his site shows this
man lack basic knowledge and understanding.
Nadir Ahmed does not even understand when he is defeated. If
this poor fellow had the intelligence of a reptile, he would be filled with
shame after being exposed as a liar. But would he? He simply has no brains
for that. In fact Nadir Ahmed thrives for the very fact that I mentioned his name and
dedicated an entire article to him. He is happy as long as he is noticed. This
page gives him a sense of importance. It does not matter if he is ridiculed and
humiliated, just the very fact that he is noticed and mentioned, is for him the source of joy and pride.
Dr
A Bostock points out that lack of self worth and the desire to be noticed
may drive some to extreme behaviors like tattooing, body piercing, weird
haircuts or dress just to be noticed. It seems that Nadir Ahmed’s craving to
be noticed even through negative response is his way of getting attention.
*
In his website Nadir Ahmed says "I think it is amazing, that this guy will post debates with people who are
virtually unknown, like 'Afra', 'Zeeshan', 'Maryam'…"
Apart from the fact that his own debate is also included, this is clear
indication that this little man has a highly inflated ego and a grandiose sense of self importance.
He gives himself too
much credit. Any reasonable person who reads all the debates can see that Nadir
Ahmed is the least worthy contender we have ever had.
* Read
Dr. A Bostock's blog: Great insights into Emotional Health disorders.
|
